Ominous new cracks found on (San Francisco) Bay Bridge rods
Source: San Francisco Chronicle
Tiny cracks found on some of the rods on the new Bay Bridge tower potentially endanger the rest of the more than 400 remaining fasteners that secure the tower to the foundation in an earthquake, Caltrans officials said Tuesday.
They also acknowledged that one of four high-strength tower anchor rods they have examined apparently snapped after it was exposed to water and became brittle. That was the same headache that cost the agency $45 million to fix in 2013 when 32 rods used on seismic stabilizers failed after being left stewing in water.
... Lisa Fulton, a Berkeley-based engineer and corrosion expert who has studied the problem on the bridge project, said the latest discovery "means that there doesn't have to be a lot of force on those rods for them to break.
"That could indicate that we don't need an earthquake for them to snap, that they are unreliable in the service loads that they are under now," she said. The micro cracking is a sure sign of hydrogen attack. It's a portent of catastrophe.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Ominous-new-cracks-found-on-Bay-Bridge-rods-6345359.php
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)It's been falling apart ever since it went up.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)The rods were suspect before they were even installed
Dyson Corporation knew of rod problems but the nimrods at Caltrans still signed off on them.
http://abc7news.com/traffic/report-supplier-knew-of-bay-bridge-rod-problems/490171/
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/05/22/supplier-persuaded-caltrans-to-use-rods-which-cracked-on-new-bay-bridge/
Curtis
(348 posts)I used to build rock crawlers (4x4's). I ALWAYS steered clear of Chinese made metal because it is junk. It's plain old good for nothing JUNK. I would never build a roll cage, suspension parts or steering parts out of that crap and have been surprised California built a bridge out of it.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)Change has come
(2,372 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)Dyson reshapes a wide variety of metals to exacting specification, yet nowhere on their site do they claim their material originated from an American foundry. Garbage in, garbage out, eh? Still, they are front loaded with gizmos to inspect the garbage and guarantee it smell like a rose:
Full Dimensional Including Ring and Plug Gages (System 21)
Tri-Roll and Bi-Point (System 22)
Gage Calibration
Optical Comparator
Magnetic Particle Inspection
Ultrasonic and Radiographic Testing
Hardness, Machined and Full Sized Tensiles
Decarburization Analysis
Chemistry Analysis, Micro and Macro Etch and Coating
Thickness
Fix The Stupid
(948 posts)And yes, the Chinese 'steel' is terrible.
Some of the fasteners we have seen would make you faint.
And for the love of gawd, stay clear of any suspect "stainless steel"...there aren't many places left to get quality SS.
How do you know if it's chinese SS? Very easy - it corrodes....and quickly.
Like those cheap BBQ's with "Stainless Steel" burners that rust out after 1 year... WTF? That was NOT stainless steel they used in production...
And it's only going to get worse.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)years old and still in fine useable condition. Others much newer pit, corrode and some even show rust!
Brian66
(13 posts)... in the world that some man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and those to whom price is the only consideration are that man's lawful prey." -- John Runyon
eppur_se_muova
(36,271 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)competitors and now we can buy even cheaper steel than we did before.
And then if the bridge falls down and somebody tries to sue the corporation that furnished the defective materials, they can turn around and sue the US government for damaging their reputation and ability to compete. And win.
Thanks, Obama.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)The galvanized rods have been a persistent concern, with Caltrans acknowledging they were put at greater risk of cracking during processing, suffered damage in shipment, and were put under heightened stress when the tower was pulled back to keep it from leaning toward Oakland.
It sounds like a bad design as well as some weird construction techniques.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)But for sure, trust them that they will get high speed railway right.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)are they waiting for it to fall first???
I have family out there who refuse to drive on it. Even the old bridge gave me the willies.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)I'm reminded of something I read long ago, that the builders of the horribly leaking Hanford nuke plant are the very same entities that are pocketing billions of our tax dollars for the alleged "clean up" of the horrible goddamn permanent leaking nuke mess they made. Dupont? GE? Their successors? I don't recall the details. But I think we may be seeing the same phenomenon with the Bay Bridge. They wreck it with shoddy materials and design, at the cost of billions; then they "fix it" at the cost of billions. Ha-ha-ha on us, the hapless public who have no say in any of it, no power whatever, though it is OUR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS that are being pocketed by the very, very, VERY corrupt 0.01%--over and over and over again.
NutmegYankee
(16,200 posts)Any steel with a HRC of 39 or more shouldn't be zinc coated. Even with the relief bakes, it's a significant risk increase.
dickthegrouch
(3,175 posts)There are thousands of bridges over water all around the world. AFAIK not a single other one is having as many problems as this one. They were VERY quick to demolish the old bridge, too. To make sure that the ferry operators make out as bandits when the new one does collapse.
It is not that hard to build a decent bridge. We should disbar anyone involved in this fiasco from the politicians to the construction workers from ever building a bridge again.