Texas Town Is Charging Us $79,000 for Emails About Pool Party Abuse Cop
Source: Gawker
Days after McKinney, Texas, police officer Eric Casebolt was filmed pointing his service weapon at a group of unarmed black teenagers at a pool party this month, Gawker submitted a Public Information Act request to the city of McKinney asking to see Casebolts records and any emails about his conduct sent or received by McKinney Police Department employees. Today, we received a letter from the citys attorneys claiming that fulfilling our request would cost $79,229.09.
The city arrived at that extraordinary figure after estimating that hiring a programmer to execute the grueling and complex task of searching through old emails would cost $28.50 per hour, and that the search for emails about Casebolt would take 2,231 hours of said programmers time.
... According to the letter, emails maintained by the city before March 1, 2014, are not in a format that is searchable by City personnel.
... Given the stratospheric total numberand the fact that nearly every email client on the planet has some sort of search functionits hard to read the letter as anything other than a deliberate attempt to conceal information. Well be filing an appeal.
Read more: http://gawker.com/texas-city-is-charging-us-79-000-for-emails-about-pool-1714757746
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I wonder what's in that cops file they're hiding?
cstanleytech
(26,298 posts)musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)But I know they are lying. Any software like Defender could pull up emails based on search
If they don't have it , the requester could offer to get it and would cost a fraction of the quote even paying for public employee time which you would have to do in most jurisdictions. Now if they deleted mails through a formal retention program that's another story because even retention policies drafted by any professional would not include deletion of emails on litigation hold or that might be relevant to claims or potential claims ...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Give a COMPETENT programmer access to their mail system, and he can put together a script to do the job in anywhere from 15 minutes to a couple of days tops, depending upon the type of system they use.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)or at least "fund some of what asshole is going to cost us".
Jeff Murdoch
(168 posts)Isn't this how they fund all their shit?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)They are clearly covering up something and hoping that if they drag their feet for a year no one will care anymore
rpannier
(24,330 posts)I mean, that way they don't have to hire some guy to sit and tectonically go through the e-mails
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Person 2713
(3,263 posts)RichVRichV
(885 posts)Tell the lawyers to leave the computer work to the IT people.
You don't even have to be a programmer to effectively data mine.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)have to go through our General Counsel's Office. They forward all requests to the appropriate departments who responds with required information. The GC's office then prepares the response for the reqeusting entity. That is our policy.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)rurallib
(62,423 posts)Even a kid in junior high could come up with a more believable story than that.
It could probably be submitted to the Onion as a satirical story and get published.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I would LMAO if the Onion got played and they printed a true story as satire. It would be funnier than all the times people posted Onion stories as true.
niyad
(113,348 posts)than a couple of days to go through the emails, even manually.
you money-grubbing, hate-filled, ignorant cretins!!
avebury
(10,952 posts)All they have to do is do a search with one or two key words and they will find any applicable emails.
We have microsoft outlook on our work computers and I use the search feature almost daily.
They are just trying to make it cost prohibitive to answer the Open Records Request.
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)Even so, restoring and searching shouldn't take more than a day or two max. I just don't know why they'd want to get a programmer involved?? Should just need a desktop engineer, and they must have some of those in their IT department.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Crowdfunding would raise this in a few hours, easy.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I'm surprised they didn't offer to privatize it.
Oh wait.
THEY DID.
That figure is what it would cost an outsider to do the job for them.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)druidity33
(6,446 posts)That's some nice shit there...
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)charge outrageous sums for various documents. It is, of course, bullshit, but not sure if they can be obligated to do the simple search necessary.
This is a bit like the crap that Hillary Clinton's emails as SOS were unrecoverable because she'd used her own server. Really?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)irisblue
(32,982 posts)and we have boots too. says Gawker
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)...or a 14-day free trial.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)or even free to anyone who wants them.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Why should this be a search? It should just be a pull the 'file' on this guy sort of thing.
Seems to me emails should be being 'filed' just like regular paperwork would be. It's very easy to do.
brer cat
(24,578 posts)I would love to see them explain that to a reasonably tech savvy judge.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)
the myopic members of this police department who seem to have no grasp of technology--and the general population (especially younger generations who have dealt with technology since they were two).
Gone are the days when you can lie about technology and what is accessible--and just expect that those younger than you or those outside of your system--will just accept those lies. They try to complicate what is not complicated, at all. And they look silly.
Amusing when these people try to assert, "It's just so hard!!" when most outside of that police department----know that it is not difficult at all.