Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 08:08 PM Jun 2015

Texas Town Is Charging Us $79,000 for Emails About Pool Party Abuse Cop

Source: Gawker

Days after McKinney, Texas, police officer Eric Casebolt was filmed pointing his service weapon at a group of unarmed black teenagers at a pool party this month, Gawker submitted a Public Information Act request to the city of McKinney asking to see Casebolt’s records and any emails about his conduct sent or received by McKinney Police Department employees. Today, we received a letter from the city’s attorneys claiming that fulfilling our request would cost $79,229.09.

The city arrived at that extraordinary figure after estimating that hiring a programmer to execute the grueling and complex task of searching through old emails would cost $28.50 per hour, and that the search for emails about Casebolt would take 2,231 hours of said programmer’s time.

... According to the letter, emails maintained by the city before March 1, 2014, “are not in a format that is searchable by City personnel.”

... Given the stratospheric total number—and the fact that nearly every email client on the planet has some sort of search function—it’s hard to read the letter as anything other than a deliberate attempt to conceal information. We’ll be filing an appeal.

Read more: http://gawker.com/texas-city-is-charging-us-79-000-for-emails-about-pool-1714757746

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Town Is Charging Us $79,000 for Emails About Pool Party Abuse Cop (Original Post) Newsjock Jun 2015 OP
Sounds like a cover-up. HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #1
Yup sounds like it. nt cstanleytech Jun 2015 #12
My speciality is public records in CA albeit musiclawyer Jun 2015 #38
Yeah, that's bs. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #2
This. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #13
Maybe they want the programmer to write in machine code...? n/t xocet Jun 2015 #18
They see asshole as a profit center. Thor_MN Jun 2015 #3
It's Texas, Jeff Murdoch Jun 2015 #19
Sounds like a coverup, no way a search should take over 2000 hours, that's basically a YEAR peacebird Jun 2015 #4
I'll do it for free rpannier Jun 2015 #5
The city is lying and they know it. Not only racists but also thieves and liars. Yeah Texas! Shrike47 Jun 2015 #6
They rounded off seconds to hours Person 2713 Jun 2015 #7
No kidding! RichVRichV Jun 2015 #16
Heh. cui bono Jun 2015 #34
They should reply with, "No thanks, Wikileaks said they would do it for a grand". nt Snotcicles Jun 2015 #8
Ha! Some Anonymous soul would probably do it for the fun of it. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #15
Ha ha that's what I was thinking. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #26
I'm curious why city attorneys are sending anything to anyone in place of city officials. Bubzer Jun 2015 #9
I work of a state agency and all Open Records Request avebury Jun 2015 #21
Hackers work cheaper. GeorgeGist Jun 2015 #10
I'd bet most of the emails are already gone anyway davidpdx Jun 2015 #11
They must have laughed for an hour at a bullshit answer like that rurallib Jun 2015 #14
Do it Kalidurga Jun 2015 #27
hey, mckinney, even the dumbest, most incompetent programmer I know wouldn't take more niyad Jun 2015 #17
That is BS avebury Jun 2015 #20
Old emails have probably been archived off PaulaFarrell Jun 2015 #35
They should call their bluff. eggplant Jun 2015 #22
This is your super efficient government under Republicans.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #23
I have friends in the IT world, and there's actually a technical term for this Orrex Jun 2015 #24
composted manure? druidity33 Jun 2015 #40
I've noticed that very often governments SheilaT Jun 2015 #25
What a crock! I think someone needs to pursue this from another angle!! nt MADem Jun 2015 #28
It's like they think only the elites have computers and understand them. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #29
see you in Court counselor irisblue Jun 2015 #30
They could buy X1 for $70 cyberswede Jun 2015 #31
Someone should pony up the 79k just once, then make copies to distribute for cost silvershadow Jun 2015 #32
Bunch of crooks have things to hide. BeanMusical Jun 2015 #33
Don't they have some sort of email filing/categorizing/archiving system? cui bono Jun 2015 #36
Any way to get this into court? brer cat Jun 2015 #37
I think there is a serious disconnect between... CoffeeCat Jun 2015 #39
Bull... WillyT Jun 2015 #41

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
38. My speciality is public records in CA albeit
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jun 2015

But I know they are lying. Any software like Defender could pull up emails based on search
If they don't have it , the requester could offer to get it and would cost a fraction of the quote even paying for public employee time which you would have to do in most jurisdictions. Now if they deleted mails through a formal retention program that's another story because even retention policies drafted by any professional would not include deletion of emails on litigation hold or that might be relevant to claims or potential claims ...

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Yeah, that's bs.
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 08:29 PM
Jun 2015

Give a COMPETENT programmer access to their mail system, and he can put together a script to do the job in anywhere from 15 minutes to a couple of days tops, depending upon the type of system they use.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
4. Sounds like a coverup, no way a search should take over 2000 hours, that's basically a YEAR
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 08:34 PM
Jun 2015

They are clearly covering up something and hoping that if they drag their feet for a year no one will care anymore

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
5. I'll do it for free
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 08:40 PM
Jun 2015

I mean, that way they don't have to hire some guy to sit and tectonically go through the e-mails

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
16. No kidding!
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 09:44 PM
Jun 2015

Tell the lawyers to leave the computer work to the IT people.

You don't even have to be a programmer to effectively data mine.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
21. I work of a state agency and all Open Records Request
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:18 PM
Jun 2015

have to go through our General Counsel's Office. They forward all requests to the appropriate departments who responds with required information. The GC's office then prepares the response for the reqeusting entity. That is our policy.

rurallib

(62,423 posts)
14. They must have laughed for an hour at a bullshit answer like that
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 09:43 PM
Jun 2015

Even a kid in junior high could come up with a more believable story than that.

It could probably be submitted to the Onion as a satirical story and get published.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
27. Do it
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:59 PM
Jun 2015

I would LMAO if the Onion got played and they printed a true story as satire. It would be funnier than all the times people posted Onion stories as true.

niyad

(113,348 posts)
17. hey, mckinney, even the dumbest, most incompetent programmer I know wouldn't take more
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 09:47 PM
Jun 2015

than a couple of days to go through the emails, even manually.

you money-grubbing, hate-filled, ignorant cretins!!

avebury

(10,952 posts)
20. That is BS
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:14 PM
Jun 2015

All they have to do is do a search with one or two key words and they will find any applicable emails.

We have microsoft outlook on our work computers and I use the search feature almost daily.

They are just trying to make it cost prohibitive to answer the Open Records Request.

PaulaFarrell

(1,236 posts)
35. Old emails have probably been archived off
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:04 AM
Jun 2015

Even so, restoring and searching shouldn't take more than a day or two max. I just don't know why they'd want to get a programmer involved?? Should just need a desktop engineer, and they must have some of those in their IT department.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
23. This is your super efficient government under Republicans....
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:28 PM
Jun 2015

I'm surprised they didn't offer to privatize it.

Oh wait.

THEY DID.

That figure is what it would cost an outsider to do the job for them.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
25. I've noticed that very often governments
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:56 PM
Jun 2015

charge outrageous sums for various documents. It is, of course, bullshit, but not sure if they can be obligated to do the simple search necessary.

This is a bit like the crap that Hillary Clinton's emails as SOS were unrecoverable because she'd used her own server. Really?

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
32. Someone should pony up the 79k just once, then make copies to distribute for cost
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:55 AM
Jun 2015

or even free to anyone who wants them.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
36. Don't they have some sort of email filing/categorizing/archiving system?
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:06 AM
Jun 2015

Why should this be a search? It should just be a pull the 'file' on this guy sort of thing.

Seems to me emails should be being 'filed' just like regular paperwork would be. It's very easy to do.

brer cat

(24,578 posts)
37. Any way to get this into court?
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:47 AM
Jun 2015

I would love to see them explain that to a reasonably tech savvy judge.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
39. I think there is a serious disconnect between...
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 11:29 AM
Jun 2015

…the myopic members of this police department who seem to have no grasp of technology--and the general population (especially younger generations who have dealt with technology since they were two).

Gone are the days when you can lie about technology and what is accessible--and just expect that those younger than you or those outside of your system--will just accept those lies. They try to complicate what is not complicated, at all. And they look silly.

Amusing when these people try to assert, "It's just so hard!!" when most outside of that police department----know that it is not difficult at all.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Texas Town Is Charging Us...