United States Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Alleging Wrongful Deportation
Source: NH Labor News
Washington D.C. After more than two years of litigation, the U.S. government has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Leonel Ruiz on behalf of his minor daughter, E.R. The suit alleged that in 2011, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully detained Mr. Ruizs then 4-year-old daughtera U.S. citizenwhen she arrived at Dulles Airport in Virginia, deprived her of any contact with her parents, and sent her back to Guatemala rather than allowing her to join her parents, who awaited her arrival in New York.
According to the complaint, during the twenty hours E.R. was detained in CBP custody with her grandfather, she was given nothing to eat other than a cookie and soda and nowhere to nap other than the cold floor. She was finally able to return home to the United States nearly three weeks later, but only after her father hired a local attorney to fly to Guatemala to retrieve her. Once home, she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder by a child psychologist, who concluded that this was a result of her detention and her separation from her parents. The lawsuit, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), sought damages for the harm E.R. suffered as a result of this ordeal. In June, the government agreed to pay E.R. $32,500.
On October 30, 2013, the government moved to dismiss the case, arguing that, among other things, the actions of the CBP officers fell within the discretionary function exception to the FTCA, which bars certain claims involving an element of judgment or choice. The court rejected this argument, finding that, taking the allegations in the complaint as true, there were no discernible social, economic, or political policy considerations in the regulatory or statutory regime that would explain the CBP Officers decisions while E.R. was held in Dulles secondary inspection area. Thus, the judgment was not the kind of discretionary function that the exception was designed to protect. The court also found that CBPs alleged treatment of E.R. violated the settlement agreement in Flores v. Reno regarding the detention of minors, as well as CBPs internal policies developed to comply with the Flores agreement.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://nhlabornews.com/2015/07/united-states-agrees-to-settle-lawsuit-alleging-wrongful-deportation/
NH Labor news is run by DUer Matt Murray.
merrily
(45,251 posts)E.R. was a citizen at the time, too. They settled for very little. I don't know if that is because they had pro bono counsel, or because, as counsel said, the main concern of the parents is that nothing like this happen to another child.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)One that doesn't have any 'discretion.'