Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,027 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:27 PM Jul 2015

Judge not: GOP blocks dozens of Obama court picks

Source: Politico

The GOP-controlled Senate is on track this year to confirm the fewest judges since 1969, a dramatic escalation of the long-running partisan feud over the ideological makeup of federal courts.

The standoff, if it continues through the 2016 elections as expected, could diminish the stamp that President Barack Obama leaves on the judiciary — a less conspicuous but critical part of his legacy. Practically, the makeup of lower-level courts could directly affect a number of Obama’s policies expected to face legal challenges from conservatives.

Republicans appear willing to absorb criticism that they’re interfering with the prerogative of a president to pick his nominees in the hope that the GOP can get its own judges installed in 2017, with one of their own in the White House. In the meantime, federal courts could be left with dozens of unfilled vacancies. More than two dozen federal courts have declared “judicial emergencies” because of excessive caseloads caused by vacancies.

Senate Democrats infuriated Republicans in November 2013 by scrapping the 60-vote filibuster rule for judicial nominations — a change Obama and then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) used to usher through 96 judicial nominations.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/payback-gop-blocks-obama-judge-picks-judiciary-119743.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge not: GOP blocks dozens of Obama court picks (Original Post) alp227 Jul 2015 OP
well, that is why so many got approved before they were in place. hollysmom Jul 2015 #1
We saw this coming. That's one reason why so many of us fought to keep the Senate in Democratic totodeinhere Jul 2015 #2
And yet, if we ever get another Republican presidential MurrayDelph Jul 2015 #3
YEP Cosmocat Jul 2015 #7
Well bluestateguy Jul 2015 #4
They've been given no other choice. Come'on PBO, give them something to REALLY cry about! Elmer S. E. Dump Jul 2015 #6
k&r (nt) enough Jul 2015 #5
kick Liberal_in_LA Jul 2015 #8

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
2. We saw this coming. That's one reason why so many of us fought to keep the Senate in Democratic
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 10:24 PM
Jul 2015

hands but sadly it didn't happen.

MurrayDelph

(5,299 posts)
3. And yet, if we ever get another Republican presidential
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 11:42 PM
Jul 2015

[Pui-pui-pui]

if there is EVER a delay with judicial nominations, the Republicans will start whining "every name deserves an Up-or-Down vote."

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
4. Well
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 06:12 AM
Jul 2015

I guess to unclog the short-handed judiciary, the federal government will just have to drop all charges in pending non-violent drug cases.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge not: GOP blocks doz...