How the 2016 Presidential Candidates Are Reacting to the Iran Deal
Source: MSN
Sen. Lindsey Graham was the first to weigh in after President Obama announced the agreement Tuesday morning, telling Bloomberg the deal was "akin to declaring war on Israel and the Sunni Arabs." In an appearance on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Graham called the deal "the most dangerous, irresponsible step I have ever seen in the history of watching the Mideast." Graham also added that Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, could negotiate a better deal than President Obama.
...snip...
Sen. Marco Rubio warned in a statement that the deal "undermines our national security" and criticized Obama for negotiating "from a position of weakness."
...snip...
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who officially kicked off his campaign on Monday and made rejecting a deal with Iran part of his announcement speech, said the deal "will be remembered as one of America's worst diplomatic failures." Walker called on congressional leaders and presidential candidates alike to reject it.
...snip...
Mike Huckabee took to Twitter to express his disapproval, saying that he would not rule out using military force in the region if he were in the Oval Office.
Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-the-2016-presidential-candidates-are-reacting-to-the-iran-deal/ar-AAcXsir
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)The GOPers don't want a deal; that wrecks their plans for war.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)death and destruction. I am hoping the American voters will say they are tired of all that (and the paying for it) and not vote Republican. They are the real enemy of America.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)!!
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...it would be more understandable if we were dealing with Stalin, but we're not.
kairos12
(12,861 posts)Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)+ Enlist themselves, their spouses, their children and grandchildren in the US Armed Forces,
+ Put on the uniform
+ Pick up a weapon
+ Man a post in a combat area
They can shut the fuck up!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Other than all the danger, irresponsible steps that took place over the last 60 years via coups, invasion, embargoes, etc. all orchestrated by the US.
Yeah...other than those....
Martin Eden
(12,867 posts)... because the people who vote for them are even more stupid.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)The public's mood is anti-war and pro-negotiations.
PBO already refuted all their points in his video message. Repukes are going to look silly (I mean sillier) except to the angry, bigoted, hyperreligious, rural white males =20% of the electorate.
Good that they keep fucking themselves and alienating the electorate.
justhanginon
(3,290 posts)had too many "big syllable words" for him to understand. By his own admission this is problematic. Remember, this is the "smart" Bush.
starroute
(12,977 posts)Or is it that he sees the Saudis as Israel's bestest friends ever and doesn't want to do anything to upset them?
That boy seriously has a screw loose.
lark
(23,099 posts)Hell, he knows we declared war on the Sunni arabs the day we invaded Iraq the 2nd time. We've done nothing but push the Shiites (who are totally aligned with Iran to begin with, some even moving from Iran to Iraq to lead) into power and screw over the Sunnis there. We want to make sure both sides have at least some power so we can sell even more munitions, planes, etc. That's the only thing this government cares about, $$$$$$$ for the $$$$ class.