Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,540 posts)
Tue Jul 14, 2015, 06:33 PM Jul 2015

Hastert attorney: Misconduct claims 'gorilla' in the room

Source: Associated Press

Hastert attorney: Misconduct claims 'gorilla' in the room

Michael Tarm, Associated Press
Updated 5:07 pm, Tuesday, July 14, 2015

CHICAGO (AP) — Allegations of past sexual misconduct by former U.S. Speaker Dennis Hastert present a quandary for the defense in the high-profile hush-money case, an attorney told a federal judge Tuesday, saying the claims are "an 800-pound gorilla" in the room.

During a status hearing in Chicago, defense attorney Thomas C. Green blamed "government leaks" for speculation that swirled around the 73-year-old Republican since he was indicted in late May.

"The indictment has effectively been amended by leaks from the government," Green said. &quot It) is now an 800-pound gorilla in this case."

The indictment says Hastert agreed to pay $3.5 million to someone identified only as "Individual A" to hide past misconduct; the document offers no detail and does not say the misconduct was sexual in nature. But the Associated Press and other media outlets, citing anonymous sources, have reported the payments were intended to conceal claims of sexual misconduct decades ago.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Pre-trial-hearing-set-in-Hastert-hush-money-case-6383431.php

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hastert attorney: Misconduct claims 'gorilla' in the room (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2015 OP
Hastert plays the victim Major Nikon Jul 2015 #1
Wouldn't matter if charges were for concealing cheating at checkers. A bribe is a bribe. mpcamb Jul 2015 #2
Hmmm - I thought? left-of-center2012 Jul 2015 #3
Don't nobody pay $3.5 million for non-sexual blackmail (nt) Recursion Jul 2015 #4
It's not about sex RandiFan1290 Jul 2015 #5
This will be a fun trial to watch Gothmog Jul 2015 #6

mpcamb

(2,871 posts)
2. Wouldn't matter if charges were for concealing cheating at checkers. A bribe is a bribe.
Tue Jul 14, 2015, 08:45 PM
Jul 2015

So what if it's sexual?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hastert attorney: Miscond...