Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Halliburton

(1,802 posts)
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:37 AM Jul 2015

Monsanto says panel to review WHO finding on cancer link to herbicide

Source: Reuters

Monsanto Co, whose Roundup product is one of the world's most widely used herbicides, said on Tuesday it has arranged for an outside scientific review of a World Health Organization finding that the weed killer's key ingredient probably causes cancer.

The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said in March that it had concluded that the ingredient, called glyphosate, was probably carcinogenic after reviewing a range of scientific literature. [ID:nL2N0WM2I4]

Monsanto reacted to the finding by demanding a retraction, labeling the findings by a team of international cancer scientists as "junk science." [ID:nL2N0WP0UM]

On Tuesday, Monsanto said it had hired Intertek Scientific & Regulatory Consultancy to convene a panel of internationally recognized scientific experts to review IARC's work. The experts include medical doctors, cancer experts, and individuals with doctoral degrees who are specialists in public health, the Creve Coeur, Missouri-based company said.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/14/us-monsanto-herbicide-idUSKCN0PO2FM20150714?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews



Gee, I wonder what a Monsanto-sponsored study will find
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Monsanto says panel to review WHO finding on cancer link to herbicide (Original Post) Halliburton Jul 2015 OP
"I'm shocked to find that gambling is going on in here." Moostache Jul 2015 #1
You mean... Tea Potty Jul 2015 #8
Because you can't trust the United Nations public health arm, right Monsanto? KeepItReal Jul 2015 #2
The same organization lists coffee, cooking oils, and shift work on the same schedule as glyphosate Major Nikon Jul 2015 #5
It's entertaining to pretend your allegation is relevant. LanternWaste Jul 2015 #11
Pot/Kettle Major Nikon Jul 2015 #12
The glyphosate is just the tip of the iceberg. truedelphi Jul 2015 #3
Sure, if you believe snake oil salesman, Mercola Major Nikon Jul 2015 #4
Mercola wrote the Wikipedia page you link to? postulater Jul 2015 #6
Funny how that works, no? Major Nikon Jul 2015 #7
The fact that someone you do not respect says something, truedelphi Jul 2015 #15
... Major Nikon Jul 2015 #17
Thanks for taking on one of the truedelphi Jul 2015 #14
I feel no responsibility to disprove something that was never proven to begin with Major Nikon Jul 2015 #16
what round-up didn't like is the report was published far and wide. Ask Bush what "brush clearing" Sunlei Jul 2015 #9
their avowed counterscience department will be nothing but impartial! MisterP Jul 2015 #10
So Monsanto hired a bunch of sell out scientists d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #13
Actually they hired a very large and well respected company Major Nikon Jul 2015 #18
Except that Monsanto wants to be involved in their research d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #19
How could they not be? Major Nikon Jul 2015 #20

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
1. "I'm shocked to find that gambling is going on in here."
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:44 AM
Jul 2015


Monsanto is an evil corporation and they should be driven out of business and their board of directors hanged.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
5. The same organization lists coffee, cooking oils, and shift work on the same schedule as glyphosate
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 02:48 AM
Jul 2015

Personally I'm not going to give up my morning cup of joe based on their "evidence". YMMV.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
11. It's entertaining to pretend your allegation is relevant.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jul 2015

It's entertaining to pretend your allegation is relevant.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
3. The glyphosate is just the tip of the iceberg.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:26 AM
Jul 2015

A chemical used in RoundUp at 15% of the volume of the substance, is polyoxyethyleneamine (POEA) which degrades into dioxane - a seriously carcinogenic chemical.

Composition of Roundup is purported by the company itself to be glyposate at 41%, POEA at 15% and the rest supposedly water.

However, without formaldehyde or some other aldehyde being part of the composition, the product would not be sprayable, and would remain in a cake like form.

postulater

(5,075 posts)
6. Mercola wrote the Wikipedia page you link to?
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 07:57 AM
Jul 2015

I couldn't find his name among the editors back to 2006.

And I couldn't find any snake oil for sale on his site.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. Funny how that works, no?
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:29 AM
Jul 2015

You will find all sorts of gibberish about POEA and dioxane on Mercola's website, but no mention of it on Wiki or any citations to creme-de-la-quack Mercola. Imagine that.

What you'll also find on Mercola's website are plenty of references to homopathic snake oil, so if you didn't find it, you weren't looking hard enough.

Mercola is such a snake oil selling quack the FDA ordered him to stop making his snake oil quackery claims numerous times. That's some serious quackery right there.

n 2005, the FDA ordered Mercola and his Optimal Wellness Center to stop making illegal claims for products sold through his Web site [15]. The claims to which the FDA objected involved three products:

Living Fuel Rx, claimed to offer an "exceptional countermeasure" against cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, etc.
Tropical Traditions Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease and has beneficial effects against Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and many infectious agents
Chlorella, claimed to fight cancer and normalize blood pressure.

In 2006, the FDA sent Mercola and his center a second warning that was based on product labels collected during an inspection at his facility and on claims made on the Optimum Wellness Center Web site [16]. This time the claims to which the FDA objected involve four products:

Vibrant Health Research Chlorella XP, claimed to "help to virtually eliminate your risk of developing cancer in the future."
Fresh Shores Extra Virgin Coconut Oil, claimed to reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer, and degenerative diseases.
Momentum Health Products Vitamin K2, possibly useful in treating certain kinds of cancer and Alzheimer's disease.
Momentum Health Products Cardio Essentials Nattokinase NSK-SD, claimed to be "a much safer and effective option than aspirin and other pharmaceutical agents to treating heart disease."

In 2011, the FDA ordered Mercola to stop making claims for thermography that go beyond what the equipment he uses (Medtherm2000 infrared camera) was cleared for. The warning letter said that statements on Mercola's site improperly imply that the Meditherm camera can be used alone to diagnose or screen for various diseases or conditions associated with the breast, they also represent that the sensitivity of the Meditherm Med2000 Telethermographic camera is greater than that of machines used in mammography. The statements to which the FDA objected included:

"Revolutionary and Safe Diagnostic Tool Detects Hidden Inflammation: Thermography"
"The Newest Safe Cancer Screening Tool"
"because measuring inflammation through thermal imaging is a proactive, preventative method you can use for detecting disease, which significantly improves your chances for longevity and good health."
Additionally, thermograms provide: "Reliable and accurate information for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis…"
"Yes, it's true. Thermograms provide you with early diagnosis and treatment assistance in such problems as cancer, inflammatory processes, neurological and vascular dysfunction, and musculoskeletal injury."
Thermography can benefit patients by detecting conditions including: Arthritis: "[d]ifferentiate between osteoarthritis and more severe forms like rheumatoid." Immune Dysfunction, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue, "Digestive Disorders: Irritable bowel syndrome, diverticulitis, and Crohn's disease…" and "Other Conditions: including bursitis, herniated discs, ligament or muscle tear, lupus, nerve problems, whiplash, stroke screening, cancer and many, many others." [17]

http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
15. The fact that someone you do not respect says something,
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 05:16 PM
Jul 2015

Does not make the statement un-true.

If Mercola says the sun sets in the West, would you then start saying the sun sets in the East?

The truth in a statement is in the truth in the statement.

Find me a major scientists at a major university whose specialist is organic chemistry who can state that POEA is not a substance that breaks down into dioxane, and then you will have credibility.

Other wise I call bullshit.

(John Marchand, who has a Masters degree in science and was a principle witness against MTBE being in water supply, was one of the top people in water chemistry for MUDD (thew ater agency for Alameda County) in the East Bay of San Francisco, he often spoke of how POEA breaks down into dioxane.



So Mercola is only saying what some of the major researchers I have known have been saying - as far as the POEA.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
14. Thanks for taking on one of the
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 05:13 PM
Jul 2015

"Thrillers" on this site.

As Mercola is only saying what some of the major researchers I have known have been saying - as far as the POEA, it seems ill advised that major Nikon would utilize only Mercola's statements rather than the research of many others.

But he will try to prove his point, which is mainly that his sweetheart, Monsanto is good for us (just like MTBE was good for us, just like asbestos was good for us, just like big tobacco was good for us, without working that hard at being logical or scientific.
.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
16. I feel no responsibility to disprove something that was never proven to begin with
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 05:19 PM
Jul 2015

YMMV.

The non-technical term for argumentum ad ignorantiam is bullshit, BTW.

Just sayin'

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
9. what round-up didn't like is the report was published far and wide. Ask Bush what "brush clearing"
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:02 AM
Jul 2015

chemical he used on his ranch. He sits frozen from Parkinson's disease for many years.

I would never use round-up.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
10. their avowed counterscience department will be nothing but impartial!
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:26 PM
Jul 2015

and they can get it independently certified by outside scientists who say that questioning GMOs will bring down a second Dark Ages on our heads!

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
13. So Monsanto hired a bunch of sell out scientists
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 02:53 PM
Jul 2015

to confirm that their dangerous product isn't so dangerous.

Seems Legit!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
18. Actually they hired a very large and well respected company
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 06:04 PM
Jul 2015

They are kinda like UL, except bigger and they specialize in such things.

If what the IARC said is true, it kinda makes you wonder why so many are freaking out over an independent review of the available information.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
19. Except that Monsanto wants to be involved in their research
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:12 AM
Jul 2015

Which makes us wonder how they're going to skew the results to make their product (that haven't been tested other than its effect on the enviorment) look safe.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
20. How could they not be?
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:28 AM
Jul 2015

The government requires pesticide manufacturers to do their own licensing testing just like pretty much every other industry. As such Monsanto would have the official source of all that information and no comprehensive review of the product could be complete without it.

The only question that really matters is whether the testing company is producing a truly independent opinion, and since that's what Intertek is in the business of doing exactly that there's no reason to believe otherwise. It's no different than companies that hire Underwriters Laboratories to do product certification. The only reason that certification means anything is due to UL's independence and reputation. What makes it even more interesting is that Monsanto is announcing this move before Intertek even starts its evaluation.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Monsanto says panel to re...