Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,708 posts)
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 03:38 AM Aug 2015

Verizon workers to stay on job without new contract

Source: AP

NEW YORK (AP) — Verizon and unions representing workers in nine states said employees will work without a contract as more negotiations are scheduled.

The wireless carrier and leaders of the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers announced the decision early Sunday, shortly after a contract covering 39,000 workers expired.

The unions said they are prepared to schedule regular bargaining sessions, but that they will leave the sites of their round-the-clock negotiations in Philadelphia and Rye, New York.

Marc Reed, Verizon's chief administrative officer, said the company is "disappointed" it was unable to reach an agreement with the unions despite "six weeks of good faith bargaining and a very strong effort by the company." However, he said Verizon representatives will continue to meet with union leaders.

FULL story at link.



FILE - In this Aug 7, 2011, file photo, a union strike sign hangs below Verizon's corporate logo in front of a facility in New York. Verizon workers in nine states could walk off the job as soon as early Sunday, Aug. 2, 2015, if union negotiators don't reach an agreement over benefits with the wireless carrier. A contract covering 39,000 Verizon workers represented by two unions expires at the end of Saturday, Aug. 1. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/c93280be8a464d21a5473c4e275a6c09/verizon-workers-stay-job-without-new-contract

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Verizon workers to stay on job without new contract (Original Post) Omaha Steve Aug 2015 OP
"The wireless carrier" I'm guessing that these negotiations are not with wireless. TexasProgresive Aug 2015 #1
News from CWA TexasProgresive Aug 2015 #2
Here is another article that may interest you: TexasTowelie Aug 2015 #5
This is very problematic I think ... bread_and_roses Aug 2015 #3
It may not be as easy for them hotrod0808 Aug 2015 #4

TexasProgresive

(12,158 posts)
1. "The wireless carrier" I'm guessing that these negotiations are not with wireless.
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 06:39 AM
Aug 2015

but with landline telecom. When I was working and wearing Verizon Business attire young people would ask me about their cell service something I know a little more about then the general public. They were confused when I told them that I did not work for wireless. It looks like the article writer is just as confused.

Back on topic: this has been the pattern of negotiating with greedy Verizon. They "offer" a ridiculous contract that no one would agree to on labor's side and the union members always authorize to strike, then the existing contract is "extended" by Evergreen. Only then do real negotiations take place. I really don't grasp what the point of this strategy is, but it is consistent in the history of my local 6171 CWA.

TexasProgresive

(12,158 posts)
2. News from CWA
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 07:33 AM
Aug 2015
http://www.cwa-union.org/news/entry/cwa_ibew_leaders_at_verizon_announce_plan_to_stay_on_the_job_continue_fight#.Vb39x1ym47A
Verizon has not significantly moved off its outrageous initial bargaining demands, made on June 22nd, which includes the following proposals:

*Completely eliminating job security and gaining the right to transfer workers at will anywhere in the company’s footprint.

*Increasing workers’ health care costs by thousands of dollars per person, despite the fact that negotiations in 2011-2012 have cut the company’s health care costs by tens of millions of dollars over the life of the past contract.

*Removing any restrictions on the company’s right to contract out and offshore union jobs. This comes on top of Verizon’s outsourcing of thousands of jobs in recent years.

*Slashing retirement security.

*Reducing overtime and differential payments.

*Eliminating the Family Leave Care plan, which provides unpaid leave to care for sick family members or care for a newborn.

*Eliminating the Accident Disability Plan, which provides benefits to workers injured on the job.

At the same time, Verizon refuses to build out FiOS to many underserved communities up and down the East Coast, and has abandoned upkeep of the traditional landline network, leading to extensive service problems for consumers. In these negotiations, the union members’ interest is linked directly to the public interest, since our jobs involve maintaining quality service on traditional landlines and building and servicing Verizon’s state of the art FiOS broadband network. Even in New York City, where Verizon pledged to make FiOS available to every customer by the end of 2014, the City’s Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications issued a report finding that the company was evading the buildout commitments it made under its 2008 video franchise agreement.

“86% of our members have voted to authorize a strike if necessary, but we’re not going to walk into a trap set by Verizon. We’ll strike when we think it is the right time to strike, and that is not tonight,” Mooney added. “The ball is in their court – we are waiting for them to get serious.”

Background

39,000 workers are currently negotiating new contracts at Verizon. Fortune Magazine ranked Verizon the 15th largest corporation in America in 2014, with revenues of $127 billion, profits of $9.6 billion, and market capitalization of $198.4 billion. Verizon had profits of $28 billion over the last five years, and paid its top five executives $249 million during that time.

On July 21st, Verizon reported profits of $4.4 billion in 2Q2015 on revenues of $32.2 billion. This came on top of $4.2 billion in profits in 1Q2015, which means Verizon has made $1 billion in profits every month for the last 18 months. The company also reported that during the first six months of 2015 it has paid out over $9.3 billion to shareholders in dividends and stock buybacks, an increase of almost $5.8 billion over the first half of last year. In the Wireline division, Operating Cash Flow rose to 23.5%, and operating income doubled, from 2.6% to 5.3%. FiOS continues to expand and succeed, now constituting 79% of Verizon consumer revenues on the wireline side, and achieving penetration rates of 35.7% for video and 41.4% for internet in markets where it is competing.

A damning audit of Verizon’s FiOS rollout in New York City found that Verizon has failed to meet its promise to deliver high-speed fiber optic internet and television to everyone in the city who wanted it. During its negotiations for a city franchise, Verizon promised that the entire city would be wired with fiber optic cables by June 2014 and that after that date, everyone who wanted FiOS would get it within six months to a year. The audit found that despite claiming that it had wired the whole city by November 2014, Verizon systematically continues to refuse orders for service. The audit also found that Verizon stonewalled the audit process.

In addition, rates for basic telephone service have increased in recent years, even as Verizon has refused to expand their broadband services into many cities and rural communities, and service quality has greatly deteriorated. Verizon’s declining service quality especially impacts customers who cannot afford more advanced cable services, or who live in areas with few options for cable or wireless services.

In 2005, New York’s Public Service Commission (PSC) eliminated automatic fines for Verizon’s telephone service quality failures, reasoning that “competition” would improve services. Instead, service quality plunged. In the 3rd quarter of 2010, Verizon cleared only 1.2% of out of service complaints within 24 hours, almost 79 percentage points lower than the PSC’s 80% requirement. Rather than reverse course, the PSC changed its measurements, cutting out 92% of customers from service quality measurements and consolidating 28 repair service bureaus into 5 regions. On paper, terrible service quality was almost miraculously transformed. In reality, service quality continued to decline.


This from an email just received:
After considering all of our options, your leadership has decided not to go on strike at midnight tonight, even though we have not yet reached a contract agreement.

The two sides remain far apart. Despite $18 billion in profits over the last 18 months, and a quarter of a billion in compensation to its top executives over the last five years, this greedy corporation is still insisting on destroying our job security, forcing us to pay thousands of dollars more for our health care, and slashing our retirement security. They have basically not moved off their opening bargaining position from June 22nd. It’s a disgrace.

We are disgusted by Verizon’s attitude at the bargaining table. Their greed knows no bounds.

But we are not going to let our anger allow us to walk into a trap. It’s quite possible that Verizon is trying to provoke us into a long strike in order to try to break us. They have spent tens of millions of dollars preparing for a strike, training managers, hiring scabs and contractors, advertising against us on TV and radio. So your leadership has decided that if and when we strike, it will be on our terms, on our timing.

We know that you are angry. We are all furious at this greedy company. Now our job is to turn that anger into pressure on the job and in the community. We cannot have business as usual. We will rally, engage in informational picketing, build political and regulatory pressure on the company, follow all the company rules to the letter, never take shortcuts, pressure company executives and members of the Board of Directors. We will be disciplined, militant and united.

bread_and_roses

(6,335 posts)
3. This is very problematic I think ...
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 09:53 AM
Aug 2015

something like 85% of the membership voted to strike ... CWA has new leadership, with Larry Cohen retired ...

- going on strike is horrible for the people and their families, but it will be hard - if not impossible - to mobilize allies and community without it. (in 2011 CWA had support on the ground from other unions, community allies, etc.)

hotrod0808

(323 posts)
4. It may not be as easy for them
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 12:03 PM
Aug 2015

to strike as opposed to a UAW or Teamster chapter. When I was employed by a railroad, we were in The Transportation Communication Union. We often worked on an expired agreement, because we were considered a federally protected utility. The strike period for us was 24 hours, then we had to return to work. Also, we had to get permission from the NLRB to strike. Which, during the Bush II administration, was a pipe dream. I would guess that this union, much like my former union and the air traffic controllers, would view a walkout as a wildcat strike and that leads to disastrous results. These workers are probably trapped, so to speak.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Verizon workers to stay o...