Amnesty International votes in favor of decriminalising sex trade
Source: Firstpost
Dublin: Amnesty International on Tuesday voted in favour of adopting a policy supporting the decriminalisation of prostitution in the face of intense criticism over the highly controversial move.
The decision was taken at the human rights group's International Council Meeting (ICM) in Dublin by a majority of the 400 delegates from 70 countries.
But the organisation would not give a breakdown of the votes.
While Amnesty hopes the move will help protect the human rights of sex workers, critics say the organisation, set up in London in 1961, risks losing credibility.
Read more: http://www.firstpost.com/world/amnesty-international-votes-favor-decriminalising-sex-trade-2388780.html
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Legalized, taxed and regulated.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)There even unionized in Holland
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)"Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)Can someone photoshop this sign to say "Amnesty Int'l Says Selling Woman is a Human Right"?
Please change this to read "Human Traffickers are protected under the law"
"Human Trafficking SPECIAL HALF PRICE PROMOTION Month"
"LEGALIZE IT"
"GO"
Because this is the Internet, on edit i will make clear that the above is intended as dark satirical humor in protest. AI doesn't get my money anymore
IronLionZion
(45,514 posts)and while they're at it, it's about time they made drug trafficking illegal too. Because that would stop it for sure and get rid of the dealers in the park near my building.
Some day they should finally make murder illegal.
I would support decriminalizing the prostitutes and keeping the customers/pimps illegal. Sweden has had success reducing human trafficking with that policy because there are no repercussions for the victims who report it. And it reduces demand.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)Little Tich
(6,171 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)By allowing women and/or men to work together, indoors, with bouncers and security, is much better than forcing them into the shadows and dark corners and into strangers cars and vans. It encourages sound business practices, medical examinations, good health, and increases safety for everyone.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Which means making it legal to do.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)The major sex worker-led organsiations support decriminalising prostitution - freeing both buyers and sellers from the threat of prosecution. It's time Amnesty followed suit.
... The controversy isnt a natural one: for people who work in the human rights field, sex worker rights should not be up for debate, says Luca Stevenson, coordinator of the International Committee for the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe. Theres been a fight for sex worker rights for decades, and it should be a no brainer for people who work in the human rights field, like LGBT rights, he says. Criminalisation and stigmatisation create the context for our human rights abuses, and so its a part of the work theyre already doing. Its the most simple thing - criminalisation and stigmatisation put sex workers at risk. They lead to human rights abuse and we need to take a position against it. So organisations like Human Rights Watch, the Global Alliance Against Trafficking in Women or UNAIDS, all have a position on decriminalisation because its common sense.
... The sixteen pages of Amnesty International's draft policy on sex work are not a licence to pimps or traffickers, as scores of celebrities have claimed. The draft soberly presents a clear, evidence-driven call for the full decriminalisation of sex work worldwide, based on ancient principles of human rights: health, safety and security. It says nothing about the morality of sex work, and it includes ample provision for sex workers, states and services to combat coercion and the presence of underage people in sex work.
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/08/why-amnesty-international-should-decriminalise-buying-and-selling-sex
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:20 PM - Edit history (1)
None of the arguments in favor of the prohibition of prostitution are based on reducing the harm to the people involved.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,032 posts)1) Stop forcing women and/or men to work alone on the street or in strangers cars and vans, all very dangerous situations.
2) Allow them to work together in places of business that have bouncers and security.
3) Prevents pimps from beating them up. Violence against prostitutes is a bigger problem than a consensual business transaction. When prostitutes can work legally, they can and will choose to work for themselves or in professional cooperatives or properly run businesses. It turns the problem from one of violence into primarily one of business regulation.
4) Allows prostitutes to pay taxes, accumulate social security, have medical benefits through their place of employment or self-employment.
5) Allows crimes normally associated with prostitution (rape, beatings, robberies, coercion, human trafficking) to be investigated and prosecuted without many of the inhibitions that prevent judicial protection currently.
6) Allows women and men to choose prostitution for economic reasons and earn a decent living doing it.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)I've corrected the original post
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Usually by people who would go wild if they weren't tightly controlled.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)They are deathly afraid of themselves!
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Whether legal or not, there will ALWAYS be hookers and johns. It's human nature, believe it or not!