A Chick-fil-A owner shocked his employees in the best way after shutting down for renovations
Source: Yahoo Finance
A Chick-fil-A owner recently had to shut down his Austin, Texas, restaurant for five months for renovations.
Instead of temporarily laying off his 50 workers, Jeff Glover shocked his staff by continuing to pay them during the entire five months the restaurant would be closed, ABC affiliate KVUE reports.
Glover even gave them a $1-per-hour raise for sticking with him.
Starting pay at Glover's Chick-fil-A is $11 an hour and he pays full-time workers roughly $3,600 a month before taxes, according to KVUE.
Read more: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chick-fil-owner-shocked-employees-194620368.html
Almost as impressive as him continuing to pay them was starting pay at a fast food place at $11/hour.
Wow. I'm quite stunned that there's someone involved with that pretty horrible company who is actually a great person.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)So, this is probably all built into the cost of doing business.
christx30
(6,241 posts)They are using the profits to do more than they have to do. He could have laid those people off, but he kept paying them.
McDonalds would have fired everyone for the duration of the renovations and hired new people.
This guy kept paying his people, and brought them back in. These people are going to be happy about going to work, and do everything they can to take care of their customers.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)The owner of the corporation is nutty but most of the workers and managers are decent. The one I go to has about 10 gay workers (I know them) and a good diversity of workers.
7962
(11,841 posts)Chik Fil A has always been one of the best companies to work for and also one of the best franchises. They always rank at the top for customer service, quality and speed. And I also have noticed a diversity of workers, all polite, at the many stores I've been to in my travels.
But the late owner gave money to some goofy group and people lose their collective minds.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)A number of years ago, the one nearest to me was giving discounts for church bulletins. Even overlooking the insult to atheists, that's illegal.
7962
(11,841 posts)Plenty of places do that. Doesnt bother me at all. You can print a bulletin off most church websites!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Have we gone that far that a company can't give a discount? Wow! And it has nothing to do with separation of church and state as this place is not government owned.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)This blog
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2012/07/06/should-an-atheist-complain-about-a-church-bulletin-discount/
does not completely agree, but I liked one of the comments:
"If the restaurant had said "10% off to those customers that deny Jesus"...and then the restaurant owner said it didn't discriminate against Christians because "anyone is free to come in and deny Jesus and get the discount..including Christians"...would anyone buy it?"
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Never got the discount. I think we have many problems to conquer but this isn't it.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)And a good way to see if it works is have the customers bring in a bullitain. It is brilliant especially since they are closed Sunday. Not everything is evil.
MADem
(135,425 posts)atheist church bulletin--still didn't mollify 'em.
In PA, there's a bit of law on the books about this sort of thing: http://www.christianpost.com/news/pa-restaurant-forced-to-open-church-bulletin-discount-to-atheists-85830/
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)and might try taking one of their "non-tracts" upon an appropriate occasion.
I still say it is flat illegal, federally, and I don't want a business telling me even what to think *about*, even if some state says they're not telling me what to *think*.
Give me my food, take my money, and otherwise leave me alone.
Oh, and do right by your employees and society in general.
7962
(11,841 posts)I dont even think they take it, you just show it. Now if they made you recite verses or something that'd be different. Lots of places give those discounts. And other discounts too; senior, military, student, etc. Places will give you a discount if you bring a can of food that they give to a charity. What if you dont agree with that charity? It might be a religious one since many are.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Then giving a discount for a donation to them, even if non-monetary, would be illegal. Unlike the other groups you mention, we do (at least for now) have separation of church and state.
I bet I know how to cause a kerfluffle and see if they're*really* being non-discriminatory - do take an ffrf non-tract, or a religion the majority considers odd, or fsm (they probably wouldn't know what that was), or church of Satan or something.
It wouldn't always work, but a lot of the time I bet their vaunted inclusiveness would go right out the window.
Igel
(35,317 posts)A non-standard one, but a coupon.
The church didn't get money out of it. Or not much. That begs for an explanation.
CFAs do "spirit nights", fundraisers. My school's stuco has 2-3 per night. The football team, cheer squad, theater company, band, orchestra all have their own spirit nights. The next high school over (whose zoning border is the road the CFA is on) does the same. As does the middle school and a couple of elementary schools, all public. Then there are community groups, churches, etc. I've seen some CFAs where, to avoid having everybody who came in saying they were with the group whose fundraiser was being advertised ("Tell us if you're here for the Quack-a-roony Save the Ducks Fund!" they'd require ID or proof of some affiliation--show your student ID, for example, or give the name of the play or what street the church was on.
The discount may have been a reduction in the amount of money that the church got as a result of its fundraiser; or possibly you misunderstood. It's equal opportunity. You have a group, sign up for a spirit night fundraiser. There may be some constraints on whose allowed--it is, after all, a private organization and it may have its own rules that don't violate federal regulations that govern our behavior.
What you're describing is also not a separation of church and state, unless you have some evidence that CFA is part of the state governing apparatus--a branch of the EPA or OSHA perhaps, or it reports to the Dept. of Education or the state DMV. Otherwise what you really want is a separation of church from civic and public life. Many do and don't see the different between "state" and "public life". But since public life is composed of the public, and churches are composed of the public, that's really calling for a pandemic of full-blown schizophrenia.
Excuse me, two of my other selves are complaining. One wants the coffee sweeter and the other really wants me to plant the yellow hibiscus because he likes yellow and the red one's already in the ground. "Lambda discrimination"--lambda being the symbol for wavelength--he's screaming.
7962
(11,841 posts)But whatever it is you probably COULD bring it. I've never been to a place that gave one of these discounts and actually TOOK the bulletin. You just show it and say "oh i have a bulletin dont forget to give me my discount'. They dont even look at it
Of course if you had something with a huge face of Satan on it that might go differently!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)If they refused to take it, they would be putting themselves in the position of deciding what religion was OK and what wasn't. Seriously.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)Are you viewing it as a discrimination type thing, or is there something more specific?
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Church bulletin discounts may also be prohibited under your states civil rights law, or your citys municipal code and ordinances. Often, the state and local laws contain similar, if not the same, language prohibiting discrimination at places of public accommodation on the basis of religion.
Any promotions should be available to all customers regardless of religious preference or practice on a non-discriminatory basis. No place of public accommodation can advertise in broadcast (radio or television) or print advertisements (newspapers, church bulletins, etc) any sort of discount to customers who present a church bulletin. Rather such promotions must be offered to the public at large, and not single out any one religious group. For example, instead of offering a 20% discount to customers with church bulletins on Sunday, a restaurant could advertise, 20%off Sunday brunch.
7962
(11,841 posts)just HAVE a bulletin. Which you can print off the internet. They dont even TAKE the bulletin, you just show it and they give you the discount. Its a piece of paper. You can be an atheist or whatever and still hand them a paper. Now if you think that is MAKING you religious, then maybe those bakery people had a point too. Because they were told that baking a cake didnt mean they were approving of a gay wedding, so handing in a bulletin wouldnt make you participate in any religion!
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)I'm with 7962 on this. It seems like in court this could go either way though. I was having a metal debate with myself over whether I care about this or not. My knee jerk response is that I don't care if they give discounts to church goers or not. But then I was thought what if it was based on race? Such as a discount to whites on Jefferson Davis' birthday (yeah, I dunno), or discount to african americans during black history month. Although race isn't a choice like religion, so there is that difference. Another scenario is a company giving discounts to people who just attended a political rally for the owner's favorite candidate.
hack89
(39,171 posts)What law is being broken?
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Church bulletin discounts may also be prohibited under your states civil rights law, or your citys municipal code and ordinances. Often, the state and local laws contain similar, if not the same, language prohibiting discrimination at places of public accommodation on the basis of religion.
Any promotions should be available to all customers regardless of religious preference or practice on a non-discriminatory basis. No place of public accommodation can advertise in broadcast (radio or television) or print advertisements (newspapers, church bulletins, etc) any sort of discount to customers who present a church bulletin. Rather such promotions must be offered to the public at large, and not single out any one religious group. For example, instead of offering a 20% discount to customers with church bulletins on Sunday, a restaurant could advertise, 20%off Sunday brunch.
hack89
(39,171 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)The owner has some abhorent views on things, but our franchise is just fine.
That owner is a decent person, and I used to take my girls there every few weeks when I was dad alone.
They don't give stupid plastic toys in kids meals that just end up cluttering the car/house, they give BOOKS.
We have a couple dozen of them in our book shelf.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)They can afford to so this doesn't mean anything.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)Thanks for posting, so many of them are scumbags I really like to know those that are worth supporting.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)for a renovation? Is he doing it by himself? You could build a new one in two months. Anyway, it's really nice of the owner to keep his employees.
NJCher
(35,675 posts)He's over-estimating the time so as not to back himself into a corner. You know, like how the airlines estimate landing times.
Cher
FSogol
(45,487 posts)undeveloped site.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)Chick-fil-As are different. I worked for a company that built Burger Kings and they would knock those things out like an assembly line. For the most part, they used the same labor from site to site so that helped speed things up.
Five months for a re-model still seems like an awful long time, IMO.
JI7
(89,250 posts)It was more about where the owner was sending money.
But the mostly positive business practices including serving and hiring gays was what made the boycott difficult.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I suppose now it's a moot point.
In-and-Out burger puts little religious tracts on their wrappers in teeny letters. I've never heard that they discriminate on the basis of religion though.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I even occasionally consider dropping Dr. Bronner, but their "religious" stuff on the packaging is so goofy that I just consider it entertainment.
MADem
(135,425 posts)patronized. I'll probably get hit by a crosstown bus before I find myself in that place--it's just off my beaten track.
But when I was down in Atlanta, I met up with my cousin, and he picked the place. I thought the food was pretty good. I can't say I wouldn't go again if I was down there--and I'd be sure to go if my cousin paid this time!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Only recently about their fine-print tracts.
I just feel businesses shouldn't push religion, or even suggest customers should think about it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Chik-fil-A!
I go to the In-and-Outs when I am in CA, because they'll give you a burger and cheese wrapped in lettuce and it's very tasty. There aren't any on the east coast at all!
I've never been proselytized at one of their drive throughs, and they're very efficient!
I'm no expert on fast food, though I've probably had more of it this summer (I've been traveling solo a lot) than I have had in the last two or three years!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Maybe it's s word usage issue, but they don't print "tracts" on their wrappers.
They print citations on them - eg "John 3:16" - not even the verses themselves, just the citations.
"Tracts" are small pamphlets or booklets, like the wildly unintentially funny comics published by Jack Chick:
Those gems, known as "Chick Tracts" after their author, have nothing to do with the sandwich restaurant.
The citations are about as prominent a religious symbol as the Kosher Union certification, which anti-Semites are careful to look for in order not to buy food paying the "Jew Tax". (utterly disregarding that the larger volume of sales from a larger market allows lower unit price)
MADem
(135,425 posts)it directed one to a paragraph or section of a religious work, in this case the bible--not a cartoon.
If they want to do it, it doesn't bother me, so long as the food tastes good. Never once has anyone ever asked me I'd been "saved" in the drive through lane...but I have been asked if I wanted condiments!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Those that are into pasting them on things will call a bible verse a "verse", but they'll also call a citation to one a "verse". I only use the word "citation" to avoid ambiguity, in that they don't print the whole verse.
But you wouldn't call it a "tract citation" either. The Bible wouldn't be called a "tract". A "tract" is a little booklet you used to find in phone booths or passed out at airports.
Some of the major assholes use one called "A tip for you" or similar titles, in lieu of tipping at restaurants. I mean, what's 15% on a bill, when this little booklet can point you to eternal riches!
Some are designed to look like money
MADem
(135,425 posts)Tract can also mean a religious paragraph or published work, as in an actual book, though--at least I grew up using that definition...?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tract
Origin of TRACT
Middle English tracte, from Medieval Latin tractus, from Latin, action of drawing, extension; perhaps from its being sung without a break by one voice
First Known Use: 14th century
Your definition is also there, but further down.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)In Christian usage, they are summary presentations of the Christian gospel - i.e. that you will die eternal death because a talking snake convinced a rib-woman to eat a magic fruit, and that to avoid that death you must ask a Jewish zombie to forgive you.
https://www.crossway.org/tracts/
MADem
(135,425 posts)Link.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)In modern usage, you would get funny looks from Bible believers if you called it a tract. And by "modern" I mean many decades.
I gave you the link to Crossway, because they are the successor to the American Tract Society, founded in 1825, which is primarily responsible for making "tract" a term of art in that community.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Tract_Society
They are popular because evangelicals have a duty to "share the gospel" with others. But some of them are socialized well enough not to bother strangers in public with their madness, so they fulfill their duty by creative placement of these things on such topical fixtures as comdom machines and park benches.
Clearly the removal of pay phones caused the loss of millions of souls by elongating the venue for catchy titles "God Is Calling You, Will You Answer?"
They are typically corny as hell, and can be bought cheap in bulk.
The Chick Tracts, though, stand in a class of their own:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_tract
They are the model for a lot of the "bulldada" of the Church of the Subgenius, an early forerunner of the Pastafarians in the genre of religious satire.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I honestly think the liturgical crew would take the meaning.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But we're talking about fast food wrappers here, not a lost volume of Augstine.
Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)I don't understand why everyone loves this place. I get RW'ers liking it for the lame reason(s) they do. I suppose they feel about C-F-A as I (and many) do about Costco. If they're a well-run business (good ethics), that's a reason to go there. But I've eaten at 2 different locations a # of different times, getting a # of different things for variety. It's always been "meh."
I remember reading a few years ago that they are great because not one of their sandwiches came in at over 500 calories. Assuming you're trying to eat healthy, that's very cool. It's nice to have healthy options. But as far as loving the taste, I don't get it. I'm not exactly discerning when it comes to food. I'm a food guy. I like a lot of things. Not really that picky. Their food doesn't do it for me. It blows my mind that it's always so busy. I don't see what other people are seeing.
Obviously different strokes for different folks. I think Chipotle is pretty good, and many people think that's "meh" (and a million other examples like that). I'm just surprised I don't like the food considering how nuts people are about the place (and considering I like most everything).
tavernier
(12,389 posts)Ate there twice and wish I'd chosen someplace else.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)I have dined there a few times (different locations) and every time I regretted it. Once i got sick from one of their shakes.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Which is ironic, I suppose, given all the uproar--but they liked the food and there wasn't as much of a blow-up about the anti-gay donations at the time. They were handing out cow toys that said "Eat more chik-n," IIRC.
It was the one in Atlanta, the rather un-PC "Dwarf House" I think it's called.
We ordered pretty much everything on the menu and sampled like hell. It was all good. This article pretty much describes the reception we got (we ate around the corner in the comfy booths):
http://www.tampabay.com/features/travel/the-dwarf-house-the-original-chick-fil-a-is-a-fun-stop-in-georgia/2174081
Of course, down south they carry a lot of country food that they don't carry at franchises up north.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)I like the seasonings, and I like the way it's fried - not too much crust and not too hard.
And the chicken is usually cooked perfectly. Personal taste and all that, I guess.
Furthermore, the staff is always polite, clean, well-groomed and diverse. I saw my first teen girl working at my local CFA wearing a headscarf, which surprised me, since it's known for having a somewhat Christian atmosphere. After thinking about it a moment, if I were a strict parent, I'd probaby think it's the safest fast food place, since most have very high standards regarding employment.
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)on the way people talk about the food. I can't say it lived up the expectations for me. Don't get me wrong, I don't think it was bad, but it still tasted like most fast food. I've only been to them a few times though, so maybe I just went to the less delicious stores.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)I know Publix which is considered one of the best companies to work for here in retail doesnt pay anywhere nearly that much to their full timers unless they are meat cutters or management.
Igel
(35,317 posts)Probably managers, perhaps a kitchen staffer or two.
It's also up to the franchise owner. Note that the NRLB probably will rule on a strait-jacket approach to contractees and salaries. Big organizations prefer to work with big organizations, not lots of little ones. (Now we bust large organizations; now we demand that small things form large organizations. It's not principle if it swings both ways at once; it's often just a show of raw power, with "what's best for us" thrown into the mix.)
Kids like working at the local CFA, but say they're kept busy. Between working behind the counter, going around asking if everybody's doing okay, checking if people need refills and negotiating the free refills, wiping tables and monitoring the kiddie play area, I can see them staying busy.
I'd note that the local CFA may or may not try for diversity--I really get the impression that the staff is a sample of the applicants, not anything he aims for. But I've heard him complain about some specific groups because they insist on "being themselves" when CFA doesn't want employees to be themselves. CFA wants them to be smiling, neat, efficient, punctual, clean-cut, respectful, and, if they can manage it, chipper. If you've spent your teen years nurturing that brooding gangsta hip-hop persona and can't turn it off and show you can meet their guidelines during the interview--and that might include dealing with tattoos and hair that is obtrusive and might put off some customers--you don't get a front-of-house job.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)who looks like she came to work in the same clothes she fell asleep in the night before after she drank too much. Ugh
"If you've spent your teen years nurturing that brooding gangsta hip-hop persona and can't turn it off and show you can meet their guidelines during the interview--and that might include dealing with tattoos and hair that is obtrusive and might put off some customers--you don't get a front-of-house job."
And they definitely don't deserve one.
Learning to "be yourself" also means learning how to act like a grown up - which means doing a good job, being clean, neat, punctual, and POLITE to the customers, etc.
I can assure you no one at my local CFA has ever glared at me and said "Whatcha' want?" like I hear at some other local places.
"How may I serve you?"
"What would you like, ma'am?"
"Would you like to place an order?"
Nope, it's not difficult to say those words in a nice tone of voice.
catrose
(5,067 posts)but yay for him!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Not at you, at the Austin mystique.
It's not all that, it's really not. And it's not even the best city in Texas (not that that's saying much). Houston is (not that that's saying much).
Skittles
(153,164 posts)now it is like a mini-Dallas
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)staff. Still the better way to handle from an employee perspective.
Hekate
(90,704 posts)I don't understand this place any more. What I "learned" here was that CFA is all about the fundy preaching and we should boycott it. Now we see a franchisee behaving in the best progressive manner, and does the crowd stand up and cheer? Not likely.
7962
(11,841 posts)IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)since many franchise owners and their workers are probably decent people who don't care about the political views of the founder, yet the little people are the ones damaged most by boycotts.
I worry when I see mob mentality and groupthink
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)If they decide to pick you as a franchisee, you pay $10,000 and the corporation retains title to the building. In essence, you're buying a job.
They pick the site, they build, they outfit the building. You pay them rent and 50% of the profits. You keep the rest. You also don't do other things--this is your job and your one business--and you are limited in the number of storefronts you can "own."
It's like having a franchise in a mall--you rent the site and pay the franchiser. (CFA started in a mall.)
Increase wages, that decreases profits, I'd assume.
But if you do a good job with the site then you do a good business. The system keeps it lean, and CFA controls the brand, and I've never seen one where the owner/manager wasn't actively on-site on a frequent basis. Since he only has a few storefronts at most, it's not like he's the CEO of a franchise with 15 or 20 storefronts. That gives him time to keep each one he has in good shape. (Spot checks from HQ are also done. I was sitting eating lunch in a CFA and a man in his late 20s asked if I had a moment, showed me his CFA ID, and asked if I could answer a number of questions. He showed up unannounced, inspected the place, talked to employees, and now was spending a couple of days doing nothing but interviewing customers to find out where their zip codes, how often they ate their, average check, impression of the manager, staff, food, cleanliness, etc., etc. He had an iPad and his data wasn't just going into his report, it entered the company's database in real time.)
The "preaching" also tells the franchisee to respect and maintain decent wages/conditions for the employees. So their turnover is a lot lower than other fast food franchises. The ones I've been to have also all focused on hiring kids and other part-timers. They could hire full-time workers, give them crap schedules with big gaps, but they don't.
And while I've seen other restaurants that hired high-school students work them 30 or 40 or 50 hours a week, the local CFAs really keep their hours down to no more than 20. Come end of the year, when some students are going to quit, they hire summer replacements a few weeks early so that by the time final exams hit the new staff are trained. The seniors get reduced hours, if they want them, during dead days and finals. The scheduling's a nightmare because suddenly instead of perhaps 15 part-timers there are 20.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)They only let you have one storefront. Their intent is for you to be a hands-on manager...if you look at their prospectus, they tell you straight out: if you want multiple storefronts or to add a chicken place to a portfolio of brands, we're not who you're looking for.
If I had the capital and experience to buy a fast food franchise, I think I'd go with Krystal just because the food is so tasty. (It's kind of a better-quality White Castle.) Krystals are great drunk food, so a store on restaurant row open 24/7 and one in the bar district that opens when the bars do and closes at sunrise, in several Pacific Northwest cities, should do well.
I'll cheer - never been PC and I never will be. CHEER!
Igel
(35,317 posts)For many, that means if it doesn't have a liberal spin it can't be a fact.
The previous owner and founder, Cathy, was sort of old-school Southerner in some ways. He likes family and traditional values. So the restaurants are closed on Sunday specifically because Sunday, for him, was a day of rest and relaxation with the family. His foundation worked on strengthening families--it focused on marriage counseling during husband/wife retreats to try to save their marriages. He also gave his own money from his salary and his share of the disbursed earnings to a variety of groups that focused on strengthening families and traditional values. He gave millions to his own foundation, and hundreds of thousands of dollars to various groups.
One of the organizations that got some money from Cathy had perhaps a dozen different things that they focused on. We're talking something like $50k/year to this group. It used a small portion of its budget to oppose gay marriage. Another, IIRC, was a Xian high-school athletic group that, among other things, includes a kind of chastity pledge that disallows homosexual sex. (Or perhaps these are the same groups; it's been a few years.) Since a small portion of Cathy's donations went to a group that spent a small portion of its budget on something that was anti-gay or interpreted as anti-gay, in monomanical fashion the organization was taken to have as its single, sole mission fighting gay rights, and Cathy's sole purpose in life was combating gay rights.
Since he also gave people off Sundays because he thought the Sabbath should be church and family time, he was a fundie. If he's a fundie, the entire organization has to be fundie--it's all or nothing.
Those were the only facts in the narrative that had a liberal spin, so flipping the script meant those were the only true facts.
That's what DU "taught." And if you tried to point out the monomania and fact-selection criteria were extreme, well, you were labeled as homophobic, anti-gay, freeper, etc., etc., and shamed or alerted on until the MIRT came to enforce the DU omerta and fitted you for concrete neckwear.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I always thought it was somewhat hypocritical for so called Christians to make their employees work on Sunday or to even go out to a eat on Sunday.
I'm old enough to remember when most people were off all weekend and got home at 5pm to eat dinner with their family.
I think that was better then. People were less stressed and angry.
I also remember when only 1 person had to work so you didn't have to have a babysitter for young kids or in the summer.
Anybody who treats their workers well and shows consideration for employees and their families I consider on my side. I might not agree with them on everything, but with so many pressures on the working class (notice I didn't say middle class because it's mostly gone) it's an important issue for me.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)46 recs on a Saturday morning ain't bad.
Hekate
(90,704 posts)Maybe my comment had a positive effect.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Hulk
(6,699 posts)Seems like some stretches in reality however. But whenever an employer treats his employees with respect and a decent living, it's a good thing.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)If I had a job that treated me as well as this place treated me. I'd stay unless it was just a transition job while in college. It is a great deal for the workers. And they pay way more then other places so not sure what other job they would be looking for.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Wish there were more restaurant chain-franchise owners like him.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)And their customer service is tops for the class of business.
marble falls
(57,097 posts)religious beliefs. They aren't as bad as the CEO, I'm still boycotting. I sure do miss the sandwich, though.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)and consulted with them on cash registers. Very nice people and the lobby has beautiful antique cars. Their food is the best of the fast food places.