Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:03 PM Sep 2015

Study Finds Snowfall in California’s Sierra Nevada to Be Lowest in 500 Years

Source: New York Times

The snow that blanketed the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California last winter, and that was supposed to serve as an essential source of fresh water for the drought-stricken state, was at its lowest levels in the last 500 years, according to a new study.

The paper, published on Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change, used tree-ring data from centuries-old blue oaks to provide historical context for the mountain range’s diminished snowfall. As of April 1, the snowpack levels were just 5 percent of their 50-year historical average.

The paper is the first to create a model that describes temperature and precipitation levels on the Sierra Nevada that extends centuries before researchers started measuring snow levels each year.

“The 2015 snowpack in the Sierra Nevada is unprecedented,” said Valerie Trouet, one of the authors of the study and a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona. “We expected it to be bad, but we certainly didn’t expect it to be the worst in the past 500 years.”

<more>

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/15/science/california-snow-report.html?_r=0

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
13. That was a most excellent read.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 07:14 PM
Sep 2015

I have no doubt John Wesley Powell was correct, it's too bad they trashed him.

Thanks for the link, mpcamb.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
3. I will be perfectly honest and say that a 500 year period makes me shrug my shoulders.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:24 PM
Sep 2015

Its not meant as a doubt about climate change because there is no doubt that is what is happening (and yes I actually believe humans are causing it to happen far faster than it normally would) but 500 years is not even a drop in the bucket really, I would rather see atleast a 10 thousand or more years comparison.

mpcamb

(2,871 posts)
14. problem is, none of us'll be around to report in. So, you're left with
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 08:33 PM
Sep 2015

the best recent information. That may include in the increase in fossil fuels, population increase, sudden (since 500 yrs is a drop in the bucket) overuse of water supply by cities, and drainage of major river basins.

Could begin to make sense then.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
4. Drought, schmought
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:33 PM
Sep 2015

Jerry Brown is still allowing (yet another) rogue corporation (Nestle') to buy water from the state.
I've been unable to learn what the State receives for its water (Maybe you'll have better luck: Brown's office - (916) 445-2841.), but do know (per the Council of Canadians) that Nestle' pays British Columbia the sum of $2.25 (not a typo) for each million litres of water it takes from that province.

One million litres equals 264,172 gallons.

cstanleytech

(26,295 posts)
15. Rain is great and it will help some I am sure but doesn't southern california get most of its
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 09:24 PM
Sep 2015

water from northern California which gets most of its from the snow pack?

ffr

(22,670 posts)
6. Vast human populations will run out of fresh water before 2030 anyway
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:48 PM
Sep 2015

No sense in worrying about it now. Enjoy the last of the good times. Things are only going to get worse as the human population continues to multiply out of control. I give us fifteen years of decline before things really go south.

http://water.usgs.gov/edu/gallery/landsubsidence-poland.html

lark

(23,105 posts)
9. It's also outrageously hot there.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 04:00 PM
Sep 2015

I lived in and around Silicon Valley for 18 years and the hottest I remember it being at night was 80, one time only. One of my good friends lives in the Santa Cruz mountains where it's usually much cooler due to the fog that comes in at night. She said it's been 90 at night for a week and got up to 101 during the day. Usually 85 during the day is considered a warm summer day. She has 2 horses, so has given up her grass in order to meet the water restrictions. The resevoirs are also ridiculously, worringly, low. But, obviously, climate change is a hoax.

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
10. When we visited our son in Placerville 4 years ago...
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 05:24 PM
Sep 2015

... It was 111 degrees one day. The gold mine tour did a bangin' business; it was about 65 underground.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
16. I like warm weather. Anything under 80 degrees feels cold.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 09:36 PM
Sep 2015

I have to admit that greater than 70 degree nights can be uncomfortable. I hope your friend makes it through and is in good health. The horses too!

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
12. Good thing Sarah Palin fixed the drought problem
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 06:50 PM
Sep 2015

with her brilliant plan to "build more reservoirs."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Study Finds Snowfall in C...