Study Finds Snowfall in California’s Sierra Nevada to Be Lowest in 500 Years
Source: New York Times
The snow that blanketed the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California last winter, and that was supposed to serve as an essential source of fresh water for the drought-stricken state, was at its lowest levels in the last 500 years, according to a new study.
The paper, published on Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change, used tree-ring data from centuries-old blue oaks to provide historical context for the mountain ranges diminished snowfall. As of April 1, the snowpack levels were just 5 percent of their 50-year historical average.
The paper is the first to create a model that describes temperature and precipitation levels on the Sierra Nevada that extends centuries before researchers started measuring snow levels each year.
The 2015 snowpack in the Sierra Nevada is unprecedented, said Valerie Trouet, one of the authors of the study and a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona. We expected it to be bad, but we certainly didnt expect it to be the worst in the past 500 years.
<more>
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/15/science/california-snow-report.html?_r=0
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, jpak.
mpcamb
(2,871 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)I have no doubt John Wesley Powell was correct, it's too bad they trashed him.
Thanks for the link, mpcamb.
CountAllVotes
(20,876 posts)as Mother Nature slaps California in the face!
& recommend!!
cstanleytech
(26,295 posts)Its not meant as a doubt about climate change because there is no doubt that is what is happening (and yes I actually believe humans are causing it to happen far faster than it normally would) but 500 years is not even a drop in the bucket really, I would rather see atleast a 10 thousand or more years comparison.
mpcamb
(2,871 posts)the best recent information. That may include in the increase in fossil fuels, population increase, sudden (since 500 yrs is a drop in the bucket) overuse of water supply by cities, and drainage of major river basins.
Could begin to make sense then.
chapdrum
(930 posts)Jerry Brown is still allowing (yet another) rogue corporation (Nestle') to buy water from the state.
I've been unable to learn what the State receives for its water (Maybe you'll have better luck: Brown's office - (916) 445-2841.), but do know (per the Council of Canadians) that Nestle' pays British Columbia the sum of $2.25 (not a typo) for each million litres of water it takes from that province.
One million litres equals 264,172 gallons.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)boost next winter.
cstanleytech
(26,295 posts)water from northern California which gets most of its from the snow pack?
ffr
(22,670 posts)No sense in worrying about it now. Enjoy the last of the good times. Things are only going to get worse as the human population continues to multiply out of control. I give us fifteen years of decline before things really go south.
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/gallery/landsubsidence-poland.html
PufPuf23
(8,791 posts)Thank you for links.
sakabatou
(42,157 posts)lark
(23,105 posts)I lived in and around Silicon Valley for 18 years and the hottest I remember it being at night was 80, one time only. One of my good friends lives in the Santa Cruz mountains where it's usually much cooler due to the fog that comes in at night. She said it's been 90 at night for a week and got up to 101 during the day. Usually 85 during the day is considered a warm summer day. She has 2 horses, so has given up her grass in order to meet the water restrictions. The resevoirs are also ridiculously, worringly, low. But, obviously, climate change is a hoax.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... It was 111 degrees one day. The gold mine tour did a bangin' business; it was about 65 underground.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)I have to admit that greater than 70 degree nights can be uncomfortable. I hope your friend makes it through and is in good health. The horses too!
tabasco
(22,974 posts)with her brilliant plan to "build more reservoirs."