David Cameron says that he would use nuclear weapons
Source: Independent
David Cameron has said there are circumstances in which he would launch a nuclear attack on another country.
The PM described nuclear bombs as the ultimate insurance policy and said the attack could be justified.
Mr Camerons statement comes after Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said he would not use nuclear bombs on another countrys population.
If you ... believe like me that Britain should keep the ultimate insurance policy of an independent nuclear deterrent, you have to accept there are circumstances in which its use would be justified, Mr Cameron told BBC Ones Andrew Marr show on 4 October.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-cameron-says-that-he-would-use-nuclear-weapons-a6679256.html
bananas
(27,509 posts)PM: I Am Prepared To Press Red Button
Sky NewsSky News 9 hours ago
The Prime Minister has said he is prepared to press the red button if he has to, as he looked to exploit Labour's division on the nation's security.
On the first day of the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester, David Cameron said he believed the country should retain the Trident nuclear deterrent.
And he said that Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's recent comment that he would not authorise the use of nuclear weapons even if Britain was under nuclear attack "undermined national security".
Mr Cameron said: "The problem with his answer is, if you ... believe like me that Britain should keep the ultimate insurance policy of an independent nuclear deterrent, you have to accept there are circumstances in which its use would be justified.
"If you give any other answer then you are, frankly, undermining our national security, undermining our deterrent, " he told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show.
<snip>
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The mission of world peace is too important for me to allow a fucking asshole like you to jeopardize it just so you can impress your fellow assholes.
MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)I assume he was talking about retalitory not first use.
T_i_B
(14,749 posts)Prompted by Jeremy Corbyn saying that he wouldn't use nukes.
But then again nobody has used nuclear bombs since 1945 anyway. That's quite impressive in itself.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)malthaussen
(17,217 posts)But we're excited to tell you about our new service, hyperbole iz uz, which we think will satisfy all your leadership needs and also provide free comedic episodes.
-- Mal
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)Whether or not MAD is a credible deterrent is a bit more of a tricky question, but if all the people with their fingers on the buttons agree that it is, then it provides its own credibility.
-- Mal
daleo
(21,317 posts)I could believe anything.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Of course there are circumstances when he would use nukes, and even if there were not, he would not admit to it, in order to preserve their deterrent value.
And anyone who wants to slam him on this should bear in mind that Barack Obama is undoubtedly on the same page as Cameron in this regard.