Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 06:39 PM Nov 2015

Bernie Sanders puts Wall Street on notice: "On day one, I am appointing a special committee to inves

Source: Salon

...investigate the crimes on Wall Street"

Bernie Sanders has long described himself as a democratic socialist and has found himself fending off mischaracterizations of his political ideology quite often on the campaign trail, so much so that he plans to hold a major address on Thursday explicitly detailing what it means to be a democratic socialist. Ahead of Sanders’ big speech, Rolling Stone is out with its new cover feature on his political revolution and as an interview with the candidate while he was on the campaign trail back in May reveals, the populist seems just as committed to major reform as ever — starting with Wall Street.

The Vermont senator told Rolling Stone’s Tim Dickinson that his first course of action upon entering the White House would be to go after the Wall Street executives responsible for the 2008 global financial collapse. Not one Wall Street executive has ever been held criminally liable for the rampant financial malfeasance that dove the world markets into a tailspin.

Sanders described to Rolling Stone exactly how such inaction came about and why he thinks President Obama “blew it” on holding Wall Street executives accountable:

About a half-dozen of us went to visit the president, I’m guessing six months into his [first] term. And we went into the White House, and Larry Summers was there and [Tim] Geithner was there. We had all their money people, all their financial people. That was the issue.

I like the president very much, and I have supported him. We’ve worked together. But these are some of the disagreements we have. The American people were crushed by the greed and illegal behavior on Wall Street, right? And the American people wanted justice.

And we said to the president – I wasn’t alone on this – we said, “Mr. President, you gotta do something. You gotta be tough on this issue.” The end result was seven years have come and gone and there are still no high-ranking CEOs who are in jail. There are kids who smoke marijuana who have criminal records, but not CEOs of large corporations. No matter what kind of crimes and illegal activity, these guys [Wall Street CEOs] are too big to jail?

That is one of the reasons why people become alienated from the political process. They just don’t see justice. From a public-policy point of view, in terms of holding people accountable for serious crimes, the Obama administration blew it. From a political point of view, in giving people confidence that we have a criminal-justice system that works for all, regardless of their wealth or power, it blew it.


“Now what do you think a president should have done,” Sanders offered, “on day one, I am appointing a special committee to investigate the crimes on Wall Street.”

“We’re gonna move this quickly,” Sanders promised. “And if these people are found guilty, they will be in jail. Nobody in America is above the law,” Sanders declared, arguing that many Wall Street executives had “committed some very serious crimes.”

<snip>

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2015/11/18/bernie_sanders_puts_wall_street_on_notice_on_day_one_i_am_appointing_a_special_committee_to_investigate_the_crimes_on_wall_street/
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders puts Wall Street on notice: "On day one, I am appointing a special committee to inves (Original Post) bananas Nov 2015 OP
Hillary supporters !!! She is what she eats . orpupilofnature57 Nov 2015 #1
Off to the Greatest Page with you! geardaddy Nov 2015 #2
This is what I want to hear from my President!!! Scuba Nov 2015 #3
I love Bernie - but seriously now: forest444 Nov 2015 #4
What are they going to do about it? frylock Nov 2015 #5
I don't know. forest444 Nov 2015 #6
Use their pull to make sure he isn't elected in the first place. They have their candidate. PoliticalMalcontent Nov 2015 #16
X gets the square! forest444 Nov 2015 #34
Threaten to implode the economy Jesus Malverde Nov 2015 #60
I think not. AlbertCat Nov 2015 #21
Nick at Nite's having a Full House marathon until midnight. forest444 Nov 2015 #29
I always liked Bob Saget AlbertCat Nov 2015 #30
Is that right? forest444 Nov 2015 #32
They've been investigated a lot under Eric Holder, he just let them all off. They did pay millions trillion Nov 2015 #54
ka-BOOM! slumcamper Nov 2015 #7
Drop.The.Mic. onecaliberal Nov 2015 #8
YES! kaboom Ferd Berfel Nov 2015 #10
THIS is why Wall Steet, The Oligarchy and Corporate Media FEAR Him Ferd Berfel Nov 2015 #9
We have needed another Pecora commission for the last seven years PSPS Nov 2015 #11
Excellent!! KansDem Nov 2015 #12
Will Hillary try to replicate this highly popular policy? Hawaiianlight Nov 2015 #13
Will Hillary try to replicate this highly popular policy? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #20
Well that technically is what an investigation is. RichVRichV Nov 2015 #37
Are you kidding they're her biggest funders. Them and the prison industry. trillion Nov 2015 #55
Maybe Bernie hasn't heard of the Securities & Exchange Comission? it's Federal KittyWampus Nov 2015 #14
Except the SEC as we know it ozone_man Nov 2015 #17
Maybe Bernie hasn't heard of the Securities & Exchange Comission? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #22
This brings up a good tangent. RichVRichV Nov 2015 #39
He should push for something like that if the Democrats take back the Senate DavidDvorkin Nov 2015 #15
Prosecution is the responsibility of the executive branch. RichVRichV Nov 2015 #42
Congressional committees investigate DavidDvorkin Nov 2015 #51
True, but congressional committees can't prosecute crimes. RichVRichV Nov 2015 #57
If Clinton is president DavidDvorkin Nov 2015 #62
That's my candidate Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #18
He'll get 2 vote then no matter what. A vote for Hillary may as well be a vote for Jeb. Same thing. trillion Nov 2015 #56
He can say whatever he wants, because there will be no day one Sanders presidency. Township75 Nov 2015 #19
Ever read a Greek Tragedy? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #23
So, are we supposed to give up on jailing Wall St. since the HRC and Obama are not interested? n/t Hydra Nov 2015 #24
I agree. bravenak Nov 2015 #28
Today on NPR's Marketplace, TWO Economics Professors Claimed that Bernie Didn't know what Demeter Nov 2015 #25
Who were they? JackRiddler Nov 2015 #52
Explaining "democratic socialism" NPR: MARKETPLACE Demeter Nov 2015 #61
I'd love hillary to take this position. She'll never risk alienating corporate dollars. Bubzer Nov 2015 #26
Does he care about anything else? At all? bravenak Nov 2015 #27
It's pretty much an all encompassing issue Ned_Devine Nov 2015 #31
No it isn't bravenak Nov 2015 #33
Economic justice and equality ties everything together Ned_Devine Nov 2015 #41
Social justice brings equality. bravenak Nov 2015 #43
Who says I'm white? Where did that come from? Ned_Devine Nov 2015 #44
You are bravenak Nov 2015 #45
Are you looking into my room or something? :) Ned_Devine Nov 2015 #47
They have not historically gone together. bravenak Nov 2015 #48
Jury Results Glassunion Nov 2015 #63
Thank you bravenak Nov 2015 #64
Tell us that after the TPP and worse passes and they override all countries' constitutions and laws. cui bono Nov 2015 #58
. bravenak Nov 2015 #59
Does he care about anything else? At all? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #35
You have no idea what I care about. bravenak Nov 2015 #36
except the yelling AlbertCat Nov 2015 #38
You have no idea what I care about. bravenak Nov 2015 #40
You have no idea what I care about. AlbertCat Nov 2015 #46
Something is a joke allright. bravenak Nov 2015 #49
An important step in restoring trust Babel_17 Nov 2015 #50
Go Bernie! trillion Nov 2015 #53
I so want that crook, Jamie Dimon SoapBox Nov 2015 #65
On day two he needs to enlist "Crackers - The Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken".... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #66
Read his initials. miyazaki Nov 2015 #67

forest444

(5,902 posts)
4. I love Bernie - but seriously now:
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:11 PM
Nov 2015

Does anyone really think the banksters will ever allow anyone to truly investigate them and what happened (and has been happening) with their multi trillion-dollar derivatives trade?

I think not.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
60. Threaten to implode the economy
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 01:32 AM
Nov 2015

HSBC was personal banker to the Sinaloa cartel, the guy on their board at the time now runs the FBI.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
29. Nick at Nite's having a Full House marathon until midnight.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:25 PM
Nov 2015

I always liked Bob Saget.

Coincidentally I knew Ben Saget, his father. He passed away a few years ago. Was a great guy.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
30. I always liked Bob Saget
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:31 PM
Nov 2015

In all seriousness...

He did one of the most hysterical stand up routines I've ever seen. It was filthy.... and so funny!

forest444

(5,902 posts)
32. Is that right?
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:35 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:22 PM - Edit history (1)

I'll look for it on YouTube (let me know if you have the link).

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
54. They've been investigated a lot under Eric Holder, he just let them all off. They did pay millions
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:26 AM
Nov 2015

in fines for multi billion dollar fraud to be let off completely with no perpetrators going to jail.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
9. THIS is why Wall Steet, The Oligarchy and Corporate Media FEAR Him
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:59 PM
Nov 2015

And THIS IS WHY WE MUST HAVE HIM AS PRESIDENT if our democracy is going to survive.
Hillary simply WILL NOT challenge them. She is a creature of their ilk.

mic drop (from Bernie)

PSPS

(13,603 posts)
11. We have needed another Pecora commission for the last seven years
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:03 PM
Nov 2015

National Affairs: Wealth on Trial
(Time Magazine: Monday, June 12, 1933)

(snip)

The real showman of the Morgan investigation, however, was not a circus pressagent. nor a Senator but the kinky-haired, olive-skinned, jut-jawed lawyer from Manhattan named Ferdinand ("Pick&quot Pecora. Because Senator Fletcher, who at 74 looks like a wealthy Yankee visitor to his own Florida, is not another "Tom"' Walsh with the mental capacity to prosecute his own investigations, Lawyer Pecora was hired last January as the committee's counsel at $255 per month. He had spent weeks ransacking the records of the House of Morgan for material for this trial of a lifetime. In his first fortnight's performance he proved himself a worthy match for white-haired John William Davis, patrician counsel for Banker Morgan.

Ferdinand Pecora was born in Nicosia, Sicily 51 years ago. His grandfather trooped with Garibaldi. His father, a cobbler, took him to the U. S. when he was 5. He attended public school, started to study for the Episcopal ministry, turned aside to the law. In 1912 he campaigned for Theodore Roosevelt. In 1916 he voted for Wilson. Two years later Tammany gave him a job as deputy assistant district attorney. Until 1930 when he retired, his brains really ran that office where he was the principal courtroom prosecutor. He put more than a hundred "bucket shops" out of business and thereby learned the shady side of the brokerage business. He sent State Superintendent of Banks Frank Warder to Sing Sing for taking bribes in the City Trust Co. scandal. He convicted Anti-Saloon Leaguer William H. Anderson of forgery. He prosecuted bail bond racketeers, crooked milk inspectors, big-time thugs—with 80% convictions. He was in charge of the District Attorney's office in 1923 when Anna Marie ("Dot King&quot Keenan, Broadway "sweetie," was murdered. For days he withheld from the Press the name of John Kearsley Mitchell, "Dot King's" benefactor, son-in-law of Morgan Partner Edward Townsend Stotes-bury, to save Mitchells family from "needless humiliation and suffering.'"



Also:

Time to put “wealth on trial” again?

Congress needs to investigate the reasons behind the economic collapse -- the way Ferdinand Pecora probed the '29 market crash, and made tycoons confess their financial sins.

For policy wonks near and far, the celebrity of the hour isn’t Susan Boyle, the Scottish church marm who belted out “I Dreamed a Dream” with the voice of an airy angel, or ex-Somali pirate hostage Richard Phillips, or Carrie Prejean, the Miss USA contestant from California who’s against gay marriage because the Bible tells her so.

No, it’s Ferdinand Pecora.

Who he, you may ask, and guess that maybe he once played infield for the Dodgers or sang Faust at the Metropolitan Opera. But back in the ’30s, during the depths of the Great Depression, Ferdinand Pecora emerged as an unlikely hero, leading a sensational Senate investigation of what caused the ’29 market crash.

Over the last few weeks, public pressure fueled by rage and pain has built for a similar probe of the causes of our current economic collapse, an inquiry that will search for real answers going beyond the hearings that have been held so far — more heat and wasted fire than illumination. People want to know what really happened, and how we can keep it from happening again.

http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/ferdinand_pecora/

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
37. Well that technically is what an investigation is.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:00 PM
Nov 2015

So what possible reason could she have to be against it?




as if it's needed.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
55. Are you kidding they're her biggest funders. Them and the prison industry.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:28 AM
Nov 2015

Last week she invoked 9/11 to excuse helping them out.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
14. Maybe Bernie hasn't heard of the Securities & Exchange Comission? it's Federal
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:12 PM
Nov 2015

and does just what his "special" committee would do.

Although it's hilarious that he seems to just assume his special little committee will OBVIOUSLY find people guilty regardless of how twisted the laws have become and basically make the egregious behavior LEGAL.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
17. Except the SEC as we know it
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:27 PM
Nov 2015

Is useless. They have no teeth, having been defanged long ago.

We need to either make them do what they're supposed to be doing, or create a new regulatory body. And re-instate Glass-Steagall, as well as other changes like putting a tax on trades, especially high frequency traders. That can help fund our children's college education. Hillary won't do any of those days things, she is part of the status quo preventing change.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
22. Maybe Bernie hasn't heard of the Securities & Exchange Comission?
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:02 PM
Nov 2015

It appears to me he KNOWS ALL ABOUT IT.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
39. This brings up a good tangent.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:14 PM
Nov 2015

Everyone talks about the president not able to get anything through congress, but people forget the other functions of the president. The president appoints the commissioners of the SEC (5 total, 1 each year. no more than 3 from a single party). The president also appoints who will be chairman of the SEC. So if the president wants to appoint people willing to prosecute offenses instead of just fining them he can most certainly do that.


However the president doesn't have to limit himself or herself to just the powers granted to the SEC. If laws are broken by wall street (and not just regulations) he can go after them with the justice department. That, I believe, is what Bernie is referring to.


There is a lot the president can do without having to get bills through congress.

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
15. He should push for something like that if the Democrats take back the Senate
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:19 PM
Nov 2015

Because that's where I expect him to be, not in the White House.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
42. Prosecution is the responsibility of the executive branch.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:19 PM
Nov 2015

The senate has nothing to do with that. All they can do is confirm or block appointments of people running the departments responsible for prosecution.


If someone else wins the presidency and decides not to prosecute people on wall street then people on wall street don't get prosecuted.

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
51. Congressional committees investigate
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:18 AM
Nov 2015

They call witnesses and expose crimes.

In other words, exactly what he said he would set up a committee to do.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
57. True, but congressional committees can't prosecute crimes.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:58 AM
Nov 2015

They can expose crimes, but if the executive branch doesn't act there's nothing they can do beyond that.

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
62. If Clinton is president
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 02:23 PM
Nov 2015

She would be under pressure to do something about it.

If a Republican is president, nothing will be done by the DOJ, but a Senate committee investigation that exposes major corruption would still be helpful.

In either case, it would be a useful thing for Sanders to pursue in the Senate.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
56. He'll get 2 vote then no matter what. A vote for Hillary may as well be a vote for Jeb. Same thing.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:31 AM
Nov 2015

Notice how the left and right are trying to keep the bought out candidates out of office. Notice how the right literally support the tea party candidates because they're against big gov when the tea party ARE big gov. Same thing from the Hillary supporters who think they want big business out of politics and then will vote for her.

Township75

(3,535 posts)
19. He can say whatever he wants, because there will be no day one Sanders presidency.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:34 PM
Nov 2015

Who the fuck is he kidding?

Can we bet on elections in Vegas? It would be great to find out from all sides who really think he or she is behind the winning candidate.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
24. So, are we supposed to give up on jailing Wall St. since the HRC and Obama are not interested? n/t
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:05 PM
Nov 2015
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
25. Today on NPR's Marketplace, TWO Economics Professors Claimed that Bernie Didn't know what
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:18 PM
Nov 2015

a democratic socialist is, and that he would fail their courses with the way he's explaining it....

I think I'll let BERNIE decide what Democratic Socialism will mean in this country, especially since the two professors admitted that there's no such government in the world, and never has been, as they described....

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
61. Explaining "democratic socialism" NPR: MARKETPLACE
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 07:45 AM
Nov 2015
by Nancy Marshall-Genzer Wednesday, November 18, 2015 - 10:09

PODCAST AT LINK AND MORE: http://www.marketplace.org/2015/11/18/elections/explaining-democratic-socialism

If you ask 10 different people what they think democratic socialism is, chances are you’ll get 10 different answers.

We reached out to the Sanders campaign, but didn’t hear back.

So, I asked two political science professors to define democratic socialism.

Samuel Goldman, an assistant professor of political science at George Washington University, told me it was, “achieving collective control of the economy.”

And Andrei Markovits, a professor of political science at the University of Michigan, said democratic socialism is an attempt to create, “a property–free, socialist society.”

So everything is communally owned.

Senator Sanders has touched on democratic socialism in stump speeches, like this one in Iowa last month:

“When you call your fire department or the police department, what do you think you’re calling?" Sanders asked the crowd. "These are socialist institutions.”

That Sanders attempt to use fire and police departments to define democratic socialism does not sit well with Professor Markovits.

“If he were to write this on an exam for me? That’s an F,” Markovits said.

Sanders has also cited Denmark as a place where democratic socialism has worked.

That gets a rise out of Professor Goldman. With apologies to Shakespeare, he said there’s something rotten in Sander’s assertions about the state of Denmark.

“I would not call that socialism,” he said.

Or even democratic socialism. Professor Markovits agrees. Ultimately, Markovits said, there’s no private property at all under democratic socialism. He said it doesn’t exist in Denmark or anywhere else, and is an unattainable goal.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
43. Social justice brings equality.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:21 PM
Nov 2015

As it is you are white and will get a fairer share than I, until racism is eradicated. Why should I join a fight that will improve your lives much more than mine? I join no fights on the side of folks who do not place equality over economics. Helping you more than me will just widen the racial economic gap.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
44. Who says I'm white? Where did that come from?
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:26 PM
Nov 2015

I don't see it as a black and white issue so much as a rich and poor issue. I'm on the poor side of the ledger, and I feel that social justice is tied to economic justice.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
47. Are you looking into my room or something? :)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:35 PM
Nov 2015

Does it say that I am in my profile? I've been on this site since 2004 so I don't remember what my profile says.

Hey, I get what you're saying though. Even poor white people have better opportunities than poor people of color, not just A.A. in this racist fucked up country of ours. Hell, poor white people face less scrutiny than well to do African Americans. But just because I want economic equality in this country doesn't mean I don't want racial equality. I still feel like the two go hand in hand, or at least they can.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
48. They have not historically gone together.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:40 PM
Nov 2015

If I was in your room we'd be playing video games. And me smoking a doobie.
I know what you are because I am an infp. I slip into your skin when I read your words and can figure it out like that. Either W or mixed with white with white being the dominant.
I just want you guys to know why the message falls flat, so that the next time you guys find that far left candidate who you love, you'll know how to frame the message to win black voters and the primary. Too late this time unless there is a miracle. It is not pandering. It could have been done easily.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
63. Jury Results
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 04:30 PM
Nov 2015

On Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:11 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Social justice brings equality.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1264507

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

"You are white and get a fairer share..."

If anyone dared to say "you are black so (insert problem you think is the fault of black people)..." It would be hidden immediately! And rightly so. It's offensive and over the top. Just like like gem from bravenak. Any attempt to use race as a weapon has no place on DU.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:29 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Bravenaks statement is fair in the context of the discussion. It’s not a racist statement.
Racism should be a major issue in this election, unfortunately, it’s not.

Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This post is not a violation of DU rules. Voting to leave. Alerter should take it up with the poster.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: painting w/a pretty broad brush
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: racist

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
58. Tell us that after the TPP and worse passes and they override all countries' constitutions and laws.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 01:03 AM
Nov 2015

Your one note schtick ain't sticking. Time to look at the world without your hatred of Bernie tainting your view.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
35. Does he care about anything else? At all?
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:54 PM
Nov 2015

You only care about one thing.


But I'd never be to clueless and rude as to think it was snooze-worthy.

Jesus!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
36. You have no idea what I care about.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:56 PM
Nov 2015

He is snooze worthy except the yelling. Clueless, and rude? Ditto.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
38. except the yelling
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:01 PM
Nov 2015

Lordy... that old tired worn out meme. It's so last month!

Must be out of touch up there.


And we all know the only thing you care about.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
40. You have no idea what I care about.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:17 PM
Nov 2015

You do not know me at all.

The meme is true. Red. Yelling. No real plans that have any chance of passing. Rude fans. Supporters harassing black folks, journalists, women who like hillary, Trying to school John Lewis on civil rights that HE ACTUALLY FOUGHT FOR HIS ENTIRE LIFE, unlike their candidate who has been far away from the black community since before I was born. Fans who single out black people as the one group who needs to educate themselves on politics, even though white people vote republican, showing their racial bias in the fact that they constantly question the intelligence of each and every black democrat who does not love their guy, and questions his ability. They consider us stupid, uninformed, idiots that owe them obeisance.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
46. You have no idea what I care about.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:34 PM
Nov 2015

You already said that.

So your internet presence and all your web sites and the many many posts here are all just...jokes?... misinformation?


Alrighty then!

Noted.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
50. An important step in restoring trust
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 11:06 PM
Nov 2015

People see the system as being heavily rigged. They want across the board reforms. We need to build trust and the surest, and quickest, way of doing that is by showing people the money. Take on the fat cats and people will give you the bit of trust that's needed to take on the issues that require a heavy investment of time, and patience.

Promising pie in the sky while letting the self proclaimed Masters of the Universe to continue to run amok will result in peoples trust in the new administration to quickly fizzle out. More same old, same old, from our moribund one party system, and the denizens in Washington keep up the tired bickering that generates money, and lobbying jobs.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bernie Sanders puts Wall ...