Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,875 posts)
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:48 PM Jan 2016

N. Korea Claims It Has Detonated a Hydrogen Bomb

Source: NBC News

North Korea says it has conducted a successful hydrogen bomb test, a surprise announcement after South Korean officials detected an "artificial earthquake" near its northern neighbor's main nuclear test site Wednesday.

The shaking was a strong indication that nuclear-armed Pyongyang had conducted its fourth atomic test. North Korea later said it planned an "important announcement."

A confirmed test would mark another big step toward Pyongyang's goal of building a warhead that can be mounted on a missile capable of reaching the U.S. mainland.

The U.S. Geological Survey measured the magnitude of the seismic activity at 5.1 on its website. An official from the Korea Metrological Administration, South Korea's weather agency, said it believed the earthquake was caused artificially based on their analysis of the seismic waves and that it originated 30 miles north of Kilju, the northeastern area where North Korea's main nuclear test site is located. The country conducted all three previous atomic detonations there.
<snip>

Read more: http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/Earthquake-Detected-in-North-Korea-Not-Clear-if-Nuke-Test-364322041.html



45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
N. Korea Claims It Has Detonated a Hydrogen Bomb (Original Post) Renew Deal Jan 2016 OP
Not good. It will be NK that shows the world the true and Purveyor Jan 2016 #1
Yep, that's likely where that will go. trillion Jan 2016 #30
Thanks, China. China keeps NK alive to drain our resources. nt onehandle Jan 2016 #2
I think they got that from Pakistan. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #6
China has and will continue to prop up North Korea and defend it davidpdx Jan 2016 #7
You mean thanks, Pakistan. jeff47 Jan 2016 #19
More likely Pakistan's A Q Khan FailureToCommunicate Jan 2016 #21
I think the big news here is that it is a hydrogen bomb davidpdx Jan 2016 #3
Yes. nt bananas Jan 2016 #10
You know as well as I do that everything is being blown out of proportion. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #18
Of course davidpdx Jan 2016 #34
I wouldn't call that product "the truth".... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #40
Considering the US is going to fly a sniffer drone to collect materials and analyze them davidpdx Jan 2016 #45
F%&@k jimlup Jan 2016 #4
here is the current data James48 Jan 2016 #16
customers DustyJoe Jan 2016 #5
Iran isn't that crazy Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #14
Isis has a whole lot of money. They're army is outfitted as an army now(look at their desert trillion Jan 2016 #31
Yes, but I don't see a fusion nuke Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #36
Pakistan is the country selling nuclear technology. jeff47 Jan 2016 #20
The Saudi's Duppers Jan 2016 #27
That's pure Dubya "axis of evil" talk. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #41
Once you achieve nuclear fission, fusion isn't far off. roamer65 Jan 2016 #8
yep jimlup Jan 2016 #11
Unfortunately they may do it to themselves. JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #12
Actually, it's far more sophisticated than that. Most modern hydrogen bombs, utilize... NNadir Jan 2016 #15
Nuclear weapons is how they address the famines. jeff47 Jan 2016 #22
Wait... what? philosslayer Jan 2016 #24
It's what, weakly, in my less than amused and amusing world, passes for wit. NNadir Jan 2016 #33
Indeed. It's a bench model as wet bombs are not deliverable.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #42
5.1, right at the surface Warpy Jan 2016 #9
And these dipshits are worried about Iran? Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #13
The difference, as we all know, is that Iran has oil. nt Mnemosyne Jan 2016 #17
Yes, indeed. I'm sure more than a few neocons have considered an "Operation Iranian Liberation" forest444 Jan 2016 #23
What country provides the technology and crafted parts to NK? It was china? caught using... Sunlei Jan 2016 #25
Please , PLEASE just bomb Fox News !! vkkv Jan 2016 #26
Kim Jong-Un Duppers Jan 2016 #28
That's not good. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #29
@AP: BREAKING: South Korean spy agency tells lawmaker that North Korea may have tested A-bomb, not H Hissyspit Jan 2016 #32
Kim is interested in 'dictator-protection' devices. Atomic weapons do a good job, hydrogen bombs pampango Jan 2016 #35
Kim Jong Un's still got a ways to go. Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2016 #37
At least they do them underground harun Jan 2016 #38
Stupid Republicans are already blaming B. Clinton & Obama... Herman4747 Jan 2016 #39
Kim has seen what happened to his compatriots in Libya, Iraq and now Syria Xithras Jan 2016 #43
Speaking of Regime Change... EndElectoral Jan 2016 #44
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
1. Not good. It will be NK that shows the world the true and
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jan 2016

Real devastion of nuclear weapons. After that NK is no more.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
7. China has and will continue to prop up North Korea and defend it
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jan 2016

They also do quite a bit of trade with North Korea. China wants to maintain the status quo with North Korea in between itself and South Korea. If the government ever fell, there would be mass chaos for years. The UN, South Korea, China, Russia, and the United States would have to step in and seal the borders and help feed people and close all the gulags. I am an optimist that someday "little Kim" will get what he deserves....a bullet in the head.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. I think the big news here is that it is a hydrogen bomb
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jan 2016

It is interesting there is no news yet how big the blast was. Maybe we will find out in the coming days.

As I said previously, I didn't feel anything here in South Korea. This is the 4th test since I moved here 12 years ago.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
34. Of course
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 09:25 AM
Jan 2016

The truth will come out once they (South Korea and the US) get more information. It's going to take a few days.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
40. I wouldn't call that product "the truth"....
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jan 2016

Their last "a bomb" was more of a "d- bomb". I wouldn't be surprised if they packed a cave with conventional explosives.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
45. Considering the US is going to fly a sniffer drone to collect materials and analyze them
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jan 2016

we will know one way or another soon what type of bomb it is

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
4. F%&@k
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jan 2016

Sorry, this isn't good at all. I suspect that they are at least partially correct. Now I want to know yield numbers. Anybody have any data on the size of the previous 3 seismic events? (For a background N. Korea has tested 3 times in the past 2006, 200? and 2013... Each with a seismic signature.)

James48

(4,441 posts)
16. here is the current data
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:29 AM
Jan 2016

North Korean quake two hours ago was a 5.2 to 5.3 on this record data:

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/#

Quick google search says the 2006 test was 4.1-4.2, and the more powerful 2009 test was estimated at 4.5.

So yes, this one appears initially to be more powerful than previous NK tests.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
31. Isis has a whole lot of money. They're army is outfitted as an army now(look at their desert
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 04:42 AM
Jan 2016

professional military clothes and weapons - they look like our solidier but with the hijabs) and they're getting serious weapons and vehicles. The Saudi Royal family is their financial backer and that billion dollar weapons deal we just made with them is likely buying weapons from us for ISIS as well as Saudi's invasions and occupations in the mid east.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
36. Yes, but I don't see a fusion nuke
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jan 2016

going for anything less than a billion, which is a LOT of money to move without being noticed. You can be damned sure that NK will be under VERY close scrutiny, as will be anyone dealing with them. Going to be awfully hard to broker such a deal when you have the CIA, NSA, FBI, GSG9, MOSSAD, MI6, GCHQ, ASIS, CSIS, MSS, DGSI, DGSE, BND, DMI, DID, NDB, NSB, MIT, FSB, and the NIS forming a conga line behind anyone getting within a mile of NK officials, agents or scientists.

That said, ANY country that has ANYTHING to do with such a deal, no matter how tangential, is going to be nuked in response.

Building any kind of nuke is not like making homemade fireworks. It takes a LOT of specialized skill, massive amounts of money and specialized equipment. Making a fusion weapon is an order of magnitude worse.

Nukes are the ultimate "Fuck you" weapons, and they will elicit a ten-fold "Fuck you " response. NO country could allow the use of such a weapon against it without responding in kind. Also, ANYONE involved would become an international pariah that would make Hitler look like Mother Theresa by comparison.

roamer65

(36,747 posts)
8. Once you achieve nuclear fission, fusion isn't far off.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jan 2016

A hydrogen bomb is basically deuterium oxide (heavy water) and a fission device to achieve the temperature necessary for fusion of deuterium oxide to helium to occur.

So they now have a big bomb that they cannot use, otherwise we turn NK to glass.

NNadir

(33,561 posts)
15. Actually, it's far more sophisticated than that. Most modern hydrogen bombs, utilize...
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016

...lithium deuteride for the fusion stage; none have ever used heavy water, although the "Mike" device, the first ever detonated, utilized tritium and deuterium gas.

That device was the size of a small house and was not suitable for delivery. The Soviets detonated the first deliverable hydrogen bomb.

The role of the fusion portion is to generate fusion neutrons, typically 14 MeV neutrons to fission U-238; the fusion is generally just a booster for uranium fission.

It is non-trivial to make such a device, since the timing is very important. One must have high quality plutonium or highly enriched uranium; a fizzle will not generate enough heat (molecular speed) to overcome coulombic repulsion.

The first Korean nuclear test, was in fact, a fizzle, but these days one can learn a lot about how to make nuclear weapons on the internet or in a good science library. Since they weren't very good at making high quality plutonium, they may have switched to uranium-235 weapons. They're easier to make. The problem is no longer the design, but the materials. I doubt that the North Koreans really have the infrastructure to make a large arsenal of these weapons.

Nevertheless, I have proposed, quite some time, we ban lap tops and Tesla cars to prevent lithium from falling into the hands of North Koreans.

Every Cloud Has A Silver Lining, Even Mushroom Clouds: Cs-137 and Watching the Soil Die.

It's rather unconscionable for the North Koreans, where famines are still known, to be making nuclear weapons, but they're not much of a threat to anything really other than themselves. They're rather like those guys holed up in Oregon. They just a bunch of nothings wanting attention.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
22. Nuclear weapons is how they address the famines.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:47 AM
Jan 2016

They can't grow enough food within their borders, and don't have enough exploitable natural resources to have an export economy. So they threaten everyone else until foreign aid shuts the North Koreans up.

Nuclear weapons are yet another negotiating tool to get the money to feed the country.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
24. Wait... what?
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:17 AM
Jan 2016

You are proposing that we ban lithium batteries so that the North Koreans can't get their hands on any?

NNadir

(33,561 posts)
33. It's what, weakly, in my less than amused and amusing world, passes for wit.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 07:35 AM
Jan 2016

It's a comment on those people who think we need to ban plutonium because it can be used to make nuclear weapons.

I discussed the point elsewhere in some more detail: On Plutonium, Nuclear War, and Nuclear Peace.

I made the point that it is impossible to ban uranium.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
42. Indeed. It's a bench model as wet bombs are not deliverable....
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jan 2016

Lithium deuteride is another story.

(We won't talk about the tritium.)

forest444

(5,902 posts)
23. Yes, indeed. I'm sure more than a few neocons have considered an "Operation Iranian Liberation"
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jan 2016

O.I.L.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
25. What country provides the technology and crafted parts to NK? It was china? caught using...
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jan 2016

cargo flight locations to ship to NK about 6 years ago.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
26. Please , PLEASE just bomb Fox News !!
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:56 AM
Jan 2016

And Bill-O's house..... and Sean's....

kidding.... nudge nudge wink wink.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
29. That's not good.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 04:32 AM
Jan 2016

Still, I'm dubious. The technical hurdles to create a fusion device are kind of high, as I understand it.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
32. @AP: BREAKING: South Korean spy agency tells lawmaker that North Korea may have tested A-bomb, not H
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 04:59 AM
Jan 2016

@AP: BREAKING: South Korean spy agency tells lawmaker that North Korea may have tested A-bomb, not H-bomb

m.twitter.com/AP

pampango

(24,692 posts)
35. Kim is interested in 'dictator-protection' devices. Atomic weapons do a good job, hydrogen bombs
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jan 2016

even better. Other than protecting his hereditary right to rule North Korea, hydrogen bombs do no one any good.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,199 posts)
37. Kim Jong Un's still got a ways to go.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 10:23 AM
Jan 2016


(Okay, I only said that as an excuse to play the music video, which is awesome. Still.)
 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
39. Stupid Republicans are already blaming B. Clinton & Obama...
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

...when it was George W. Bush who called North Korea part of "the axis of evil." When Bush II was President, the UN Nuclear Weapons Inspectors got kicked out of North Korea.
Irresponsible rhetoric has its consequences.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
43. Kim has seen what happened to his compatriots in Libya, Iraq and now Syria
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016

He knows that, in the modern world, the only way for a dictator to remain in power is to drive the pricetag for his ouster beyond anything the free world is willing to pay. Ousting Ghadaffi cost nothing, and the world was glad to see him gone. Ousting Saddam was a hell of a lot more expensive (in both lives and resources), and the world is still unhappy with it. Outsing Assad has turned into a quagmire that the world can't even find a resolution to.

He wants to make sure that his own removal carries a pricetag that will make the world scream for peace. How many millions of lives do we want to sacrifice to oust him?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»N. Korea Claims It Has De...