Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 07:32 AM Jan 2016

Mr. Moniz's Nuclear Warning

Source: Wall Street Journal

The keeper of America’s arsenal sends an S.O.S. about its deterioration.

North Korea’s nuclear test last week is a reminder that we’re living in a new era of nuclear proliferation. Now comes a warning from U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz that the Obama Administration is neglecting America’s nuclear umbrella.

In a Dec. 23 letter that hasn’t been publicly reported, Mr. Moniz asked White House budget director Shaun Donovan to reconsider the fiscal 2017 budget proposal due to Congress by Feb. 2. “It would not be responsible to submit a budget with such obvious programmatic gaps,” he writes. Without an additional $5.2 billion for out-years 2018 to 2021, the budget will “lack credibility with Congress and stakeholders” and “fuel uncertainty” within the Energy Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

Mr. Moniz went on to note that “a majority of NNSA’s facilities and systems are well beyond end-of-life.” Also, “infrastructure problems such as falling ceilings are increasing in frequency and severity,” as more than 50% of facilities are at least 40 years old and nearly 30% date to World War II. “The entire complex could be placed at risk if there is a failure where a single point would disrupt a critical link in infrastructure.” Yet the White House is set to request only half the funding needed for facilities between 2018 and 2021.

Higher-tech parts of the system are struggling, too. “There has been a steady decline in the performance of the nuclear weapons computer codes needed to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear stockpile,” Mr. Moniz wrote, but the current budget seeks less than a third of what’s needed, despite an executive order on “strategic computing” issued six months ago. He added that uranium-enrichment programs and satellite systems are short some $715 million.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.wsj.com/articles/mr-monizs-nuclear-warning-1452644053



Although this an Opinion piece, it should be considered Latest Breaking News because it reveals the important contents of "a Dec. 23 letter that hasn’t been publicly reported", a letter by the head of the Department of Energy.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr. Moniz's Nuclear Warning (Original Post) bananas Jan 2016 OP
while I think we need to phase out nuclear weapons for good, it seems important Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #1
In case you needed any more convincing . . FairWinds Jan 2016 #2
"nearly 30% date to World War II" Javaman Jan 2016 #3
 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
1. while I think we need to phase out nuclear weapons for good, it seems important
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 08:00 AM
Jan 2016

that we properly maintain the ones we have-- at least while they are still viable.

This is pretty scary stuff if the infrastructure around these nukes is failing.

There was also that issue of the crude oil trains that tend to crash going right through regions of dense nuclear missile silos, which seems freaking dangerous.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
2. In case you needed any more convincing . .
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

that human civilization is not close to being mature
enough for this technology.

If nukes are supposed to keep us safe, why
aren't we safe?

Answer: Nuclear weapons are actually cowardly.

Veterans For Peace

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mr. Moniz's Nuclear Warni...