Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 12:47 PM Jan 2016

MU professor Melissa Click, who called for ‘muscle’ to remove reporter, charged with assault

Source: Kansas City Star

COLUMBIA - Melissa Click, the University of Missouri communications professor who garnered widespread scorn for trying to physically remove a student reporter from a campus protest, was formally charged with assault Monday morning.

A spokeswoman for the Columbia Prosecutor’s Office said Click was being charged with third degree assault, a class C misdemeanor that carries a possible 15-day jail sentence.

Click was caught on video calling for “some muscle” to remove a student reporter from an area on the university’s flagship campus where protesters had gathered. The protests eventually led to the resignation of University of Missouri System President Tim Wolfe and Mizzou Chancellor R. Bown Loftin. Click, however, remains as an assistant professor in the Department of Communications.

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article56443200.html

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MU professor Melissa Click, who called for ‘muscle’ to remove reporter, charged with assault (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Jan 2016 OP
When SJW get off the intertubes and DO IT LIVE (O'Reilly Style) LOL snooper2 Jan 2016 #1
"SJW" alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #19
You can thumbs down all you want, but SJW apply to internet tools across the spectrum snooper2 Jan 2016 #20
Uh huh alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #21
To the contrary, the term works perfectly in this case. NaturalHigh Jan 2016 #23
+1 romanic Jan 2016 #37
She's really letting her crazy show in that picture. NaturalHigh Jan 2016 #22
"SJW" Reddit is leaking it's Brogressives. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #40
unreal pothos Jan 2016 #47
she's an asshat royale, but I'm not seeing a criminal violation nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #2
Without any need to analyze the relevant criminal statutes, branford Jan 2016 #5
if you are correct, that's an abuse of prosecutorial discretion and the office itself nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #7
Why? branford Jan 2016 #30
you prefaced your remarks with "Without any need to analyze the relevant criminal statutes" geek tragedy Jan 2016 #32
No, I simply did not want to get into an ancillary discussion branford Jan 2016 #33
you are presuming that the decision to prosecute is based on community sentiment geek tragedy Jan 2016 #34
I surmise that both legislative and community sentiment factored into the decision to prosecute. branford Jan 2016 #36
turning the office of the prosecutor into an extension of a faction geek tragedy Jan 2016 #39
She an untenured facility at a state institution. branford Jan 2016 #46
Her minor offense pales in comparison to the corruption and systematic abuses of authority geek tragedy Jan 2016 #51
Law enforcement in Columbia has nothing to do with Ferguson. pintobean Feb 2016 #56
"volumes about what is really going on" melman Feb 2016 #58
She committed textbook assault... TipTok Feb 2016 #55
She was pushing on a reporter. pintobean Jan 2016 #10
Which is battery exboyfil Jan 2016 #26
If you read the law, you will see a violation Lemoni Jan 2016 #43
Agreed. yardwork Jan 2016 #48
Good. I hope she does the fifteen days. NaturalHigh Jan 2016 #3
Kinda wondering what took so long ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2016 #4
Good to know that when there are terroristic threats against the black students, someone may Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #6
The two students that made threats against black students were arrested immediately. Ace Rothstein Jan 2016 #8
Pushing people and calling for a goon squad to attack a reporter is not demonstrating. Skeeter Barnes Jan 2016 #25
One of those she threatened was a minority... beevul Jan 2016 #27
What does it matter? TipTok Jan 2016 #28
Read the post I was responding to for your answer. N/T beevul Jan 2016 #29
When did it become chervilant Jan 2016 #9
She made up the rule herself because she doesn't have two brain cells to rub together. iandhr Jan 2016 #15
It isn't a rule, and using physical force against anyone is assault. Yo_Mama Jan 2016 #16
Too true. chervilant Jan 2016 #18
Reporter didn't have the proper "Safe Space" camera :) snooper2 Jan 2016 #24
Oh Melissa... SoapBox Jan 2016 #11
Glad to hear it. K&R closeupready Jan 2016 #12
Yes, I agree. But I am glad to see that there was a consequence. Yo_Mama Jan 2016 #17
She brought this on herself bluestateguy Jan 2016 #13
Could we charge Der Donald? Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #14
It's legal to remove or eject someone from an event on private property, branford Jan 2016 #31
She is up for tenure jumptheshadow Jan 2016 #35
Good. romanic Jan 2016 #38
there's a lot of profs who like to be photographed with a mic as though MisterP Jan 2016 #41
When I was watching that video, I couldn't figure out why she was so upset with the reporter PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #42
Yes, this story is very confusing to me, too William Seger Jan 2016 #44
The gist of it romanic Jan 2016 #45
I think it was more 'approved' media... TipTok Jan 2016 #49
from what I've read, she's a liberal in support of the students and the 10 repub lawmakers are Demonaut Jan 2016 #50
Good. X_Digger Jan 2016 #52
What a nitwit. Quantess Jan 2016 #53
She really will need muscle now bluestateguy Feb 2016 #54
She's a jerk tonekat Feb 2016 #57
SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR gets the bad news. GOLGO 13 Feb 2016 #59
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
20. You can thumbs down all you want, but SJW apply to internet tools across the spectrum
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jan 2016

Shit, there are some Bundy SJW all over YouTube comments right now.

They are pretty fun to troll

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. Without any need to analyze the relevant criminal statutes,
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

I would surmise that the criminal charges are a coordinated means to force Click to resign quietly and go away, far, far away.

Any attempt by her to defend herself in court or otherwise, particularly after she admitted wrongdoing, will be a public relations nightmare for her and any cause she supports. She's poison.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
30. Why?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jan 2016

Click's conduct can easily fit within a multitude of local assault and battery statutes, particularly such a low level misdemeanor of which she is charged.

Prosecutorial discretion also has few limitations, prosecutors may consult with the community to determine if charges are necessary or worthwhile, and Click's videotaped conduct offers multiple, entirely legitimate reasons to prosecute, include pushing the legal envelope in potential charges. Prosecutorial discretion would also be appropriately applied if the prosecutor agreed to drop the charges or offer a conditional discharge in return for Click's resignation.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. you prefaced your remarks with "Without any need to analyze the relevant criminal statutes"
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jan 2016

indicating a belief that non-legal reasoning was driving the decision to prosecute.

"pushing the legal envelope in potential charges" in order to curry favor with political interests is exactly what responsible prosecutors do not do.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
33. No, I simply did not want to get into an ancillary discussion
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:08 PM
Jan 2016

concerning the technical requirements necessary to sustain local, low level misdemeanor criminal assault charges.

More importantly, never forget that local district or state's attorneys are elected. They all curry favor with political interests and take community sentiments into account when making charging decisions, regardless of whether those interests and opinions are on the right or left of the political spectrum. So long as they follow the various applicable canons of ethics for lawyers, they have committed no ethical lapse. I can further assure you that except in the most egregious of examples, and this clearly doesn't apply here, overcharging or seeking the maximum criminal charge that may be sustained is definitely within a prosecutor's discretion. Similarly, employing legitimate criminal charges with a willingness to accept a plea or agreement with only civil penalties, such as a professor's resignation after she employed violence against student in a public space, is also perfectly ethical.

You certainly may disagree with this prosecutor's reasons or decision mechanism for bringing charges (if I'm indeed correct as to state's motives) or the criminal charge itself, but I do not see any violations of defined prosecutorial power or ethics.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
34. you are presuming that the decision to prosecute is based on community sentiment
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:11 PM
Jan 2016

rather than that from the state legislature.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
36. I surmise that both legislative and community sentiment factored into the decision to prosecute.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

In fact, the only people who appear to have offered even tepid defense of Click are a very small minority of other activist professors who wrote a letter to the Dean.

It's undeniable that Click's conduct was terrible and counterproductive, almost certainly a criminal violation, albeit quite minor, and she definitely should have known better. One can certainly argue that the national shame and humiliation she endured was punishment enough, but the very minor criminal charges should nevertheless still come as no surprise to anyone, particularly since she refused to resign. A criminal conviction for her conduct (or a plea or similar agreement), no matter that's it's a misdemeanor, will easily provide enough justification to get rid of Click, a demonstrated violent troublemaker, while silencing most critics of her removal.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
39. turning the office of the prosecutor into an extension of a faction
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:50 PM
Jan 2016

within the legislature, systematically punishing those of a certain alignment, is the stuff of police states.

It is a half-step from that to stuff like this:

http://reason.com/blog/2015/01/19/that-time-the-fbi-tried-to-get-mlk-to-co


this woman should be fired, but that's the province of university administration

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
46. She an untenured facility at a state institution.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:56 AM
Jan 2016

Any member of the legislature, the local community, the school, the elected prosecutor, students, faculty, etc. all have the right to comment about Click and use any legal authority or persuasiveness at their disposal to advocate for or against her termination or criminal charges.

To compare the mess that Click brought entirely upon herself at Mizzo as the "stuff of police states" is ludicrously hyperbolic and just inaccurate.

Moreover, what is her purported "alignment" that the legislature wants to punish? Admittedly violent state college communications and journalism professors without tenure who seek to deny people and the press access to public spaces? Her conduct certainly doesn't place her within the confines of anything resembling liberal or progressive thought. In fact, those members of the legislature (and state's attorney) democratically represent their constituents, and their strong condemnation of Click is not only entirely appropriate, but expected. She's not being discriminated against because she holds liberal views, rather because she's a violent idiot who abused her position of authority and is a poor role model for her students by any standard. The fact that she wasn't immediately terminated is the only mystery that needs any explanation.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
51. Her minor offense pales in comparison to the corruption and systematic abuses of authority
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:31 AM
Jan 2016

throughout the state of Missouri by local officials and police departments, especially in their interactions with poor and black citizens of Missouri.

No criminal charges filed against those officials, no accountability whatsoever at the state level. It took an intensive investigation by Eric Holder's DOJ to get anything changed there.

Melissa Click is being targeted because she's on the opposite side of those corrupt officials, whose defenders include the same people who are agitating for her to be thrown in jail.

As I said, when it's only one side being punished, the result is not justice.

As I noted above, Melissa Click is an asshat royale. But that law enforcement in the state of Missouri chose to prosecute her and not the criminals in places like Ferguson speaks volumes about what is really going on.



 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
56. Law enforcement in Columbia has nothing to do with Ferguson.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 10:24 PM
Feb 2016

The premise of your post is ridiculous. Columbia pressed charges on Click because the journalist involved filed a complaint, and there was evidence of the crime.

They couldn't do nothing and claim Ferguson as a reason.

 

Lemoni

(5 posts)
43. If you read the law, you will see a violation
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jan 2016

This degree assault occurs if,...

"The person knowingly causes physical contact with another person knowing the other person will regard the contact as offensive or provocative" http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/56500000701.HTML

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
4. Kinda wondering what took so long
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

She deserves it, but I feel like charges should have been pressed immediately by the aggrieved party.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
6. Good to know that when there are terroristic threats against the black students, someone may
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jan 2016

eventually get indicted (kinda sad that it's the person who was demonstrating on the side of the threatened students, but that USA in our post-racism society).

Ace Rothstein

(3,163 posts)
8. The two students that made threats against black students were arrested immediately.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

Just because Click was on the side of the threatened students doesn't mean she doesn't deserve to be arrested for assaulting someone.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
27. One of those she threatened was a minority...
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

One of those she threatened was a minority, if memory serves.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
16. It isn't a rule, and using physical force against anyone is assault.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jan 2016

We don't need reporters to be muscled around.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
12. Glad to hear it. K&R
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

As a disclaimer, I won't say that I think she's a horrible person, because in the heat of the moment, she may have just gotten carried away. That's happened to almost everyone. This will pass, and her life will go on, and the lesson will be learned.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
13. She brought this on herself
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jan 2016

Her behavior was thuggish, unprofessional, intimidating and possibly and incitement of violence against a journalist.

Was it criminal?

Let a jury decide.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
31. It's legal to remove or eject someone from an event on private property,
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jan 2016

particularly if they're being disruptive, and even if it is a political event.

Click, a professor of communications and journalism, was personally attempting to utilize violence to prevent a reporter from entering upon and reporting conduct on public property.


romanic

(2,841 posts)
38. Good.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

She and other professors need to learn that you can't try to appease your student "activist" and go along and bully other students on campus for "violating your safe space". It may be harsh to put her in jail (which I think won't happen, she'll prob get a fine at most) but it's a strong message not to intimidate or harass your own students.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
41. there's a lot of profs who like to be photographed with a mic as though
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 07:54 PM
Jan 2016

they're riling the crowd up themselves (remember Bob Dornan's speeches to the empty House?)

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
42. When I was watching that video, I couldn't figure out why she was so upset with the reporter
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jan 2016

I was confused as to why they wanted the school reporter gone. Was there any bad history with the reporter, or was that just her exposing her authoritarian personality?

*Not saying that a bad history with the reporter was a legitimate reason to prevent him entering the space, or for pushing him. I'm just curious what was going through her mind at the time.

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
44. Yes, this story is very confusing to me, too
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jan 2016

I don't get it. Typically, the whole point of a demonstration is to get media attention.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
45. The gist of it
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 02:30 AM
Jan 2016

basically boils down to some of the Mizzou activists setting up a "safe space" in a pubiic quad and not wanting any media to cover what they were doing.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
49. I think it was more 'approved' media...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:15 AM
Jan 2016

... Who would be sympathetic to their cause.

You can come as long as you write what we want you to write.

Demonaut

(8,918 posts)
50. from what I've read, she's a liberal in support of the students and the 10 repub lawmakers are
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jan 2016

pushing for her expulsion
on edit, so sjw applies here?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MU professor Melissa Clic...