Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 07:37 PM Jan 2016

Doomsday Clock stuck near midnight due to climate change and nuclear war

Source: Guardian

The Doomsday Clock, the symbolic countdown to humanity’s end, remained stuck on the brink of the apocalypse for a second year on Tuesday, because of the continued existential threats posed by nuclear war and climate change.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the group which created the clock in 1947, said it was keeping the clock hands set at three minutes to midnight – the closest the clock has come to destruction since the throes of the cold war in 1984.

<snip>

“The decision not to move the hands of the clock in 2016 is not good news,” Lawrence Krauss, who chairs the Bulletin’s board of sponsors, said in announcing the new clock setting.

The scientists, reinforced by former US cabinet secretaries William Perry and George Shultz, based their dire symbolic forecast on challenges of a global scale such as nuclear war and climate change.

<snip>

Leaders needed to focus on the big challenges of the age, said Jerry Brown, California’s governor.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/26/doomsday-clock-three-minutes-to-midnight-climate-change-nuclear-war



Video of the announcement is at http://clock.thebulletin.org/2016
and is worth watching.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doomsday Clock stuck near midnight due to climate change and nuclear war (Original Post) bananas Jan 2016 OP
Anybody besides me find the Doomsday Clock a rather clumsy device? Paladin Jan 2016 #1
No! longship Jan 2016 #4
Not so much clumsy as ineffectual Nihil Jan 2016 #6
"Ineffectual" is a useful description. (nt) Paladin Jan 2016 #7
I would have voted to move it another minute closer. roamer65 Jan 2016 #2
They are pretty conservative on moving the clock. nt longship Jan 2016 #5
It is a clarion call, as always. longship Jan 2016 #3

Paladin

(28,269 posts)
1. Anybody besides me find the Doomsday Clock a rather clumsy device?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 07:43 PM
Jan 2016

I know the intent is noble, but it's never struck much of a chord (so to speak) with me.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
6. Not so much clumsy as ineffectual
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 06:19 AM
Jan 2016

It's about as useful as Punxsutawney Phil - nobody in power is affected by it
and anyone who is influenced by it is powerless to do anything about it.

Still, symbolism still has a place in human society so I have no problem
with it being kept (along with its annual rituals) and revered as a semi-religious
artifact for the modern world.



longship

(40,416 posts)
3. It is a clarion call, as always.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:10 PM
Jan 2016
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is one of the best!

Their iconic doomsday clock is an incredible social/political metaphor for the state of the world.

I gladly DURec this thread.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Doomsday Clock stuck near...