Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:15 AM Jan 2016

The Cop Who Killed Laquan McDonald Had Broken His Dashcam On Purpose, Report Says

Source: Huff Post

The Chicago police officer who fatally shot black teenager Laquan McDonald intentionally damaged his dashcam and never synced his microphone to it. And he's not the only one.

More than 1,800 police maintenance logs first obtained by DNAinfo Chicago show a disturbing trend of Chicago cops intentionally and routinely tampering with their dashcams and mics in an effort to block audio.

Jason Van Dyke, the officer charged with fatally shooting 17-year-old McDonald in October 2014, caused "intentional damage" to his dashcam at least once, along with other instances of his dashcam breaking, the logs show. The day of the killing, audio wasn't picked up by Van Dyke's car, nor by the squad car next to his.

The vehicle did pick up video, however, which shows Van Dyke shooting McDonald 16 times


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/chicago-police-damaged-dashcam-microphones_us_56a952f6e4b0d82286d4e101

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Cop Who Killed Laquan McDonald Had Broken His Dashcam On Purpose, Report Says (Original Post) Stuart G Jan 2016 OP
If I were on the jury, I'd take that as evidence of premeditation. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #1
+1 daleanime Jan 2016 #9
Huge agree here. christx30 Jan 2016 #13
You're absolutely right nyabingi Jan 2016 #14
+10000 trillion Jan 2016 #20
It's amazing how many police cameras suddenly quit working when the cops are breaking the law. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #2
Completely corrupt. SoapBox Jan 2016 #3
Let's face it, monicaangela Jan 2016 #4
Gee, sounds like tampering with government records. DetlefK Jan 2016 #5
Yes, and it should mean instant loss of employment and loss of all pension benefits.... Human101948 Jan 2016 #6
Premeditated murder? jwirr Jan 2016 #7
Instant firing offense. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #8
fuck tha police frylock Jan 2016 #10
We need AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION OF OFFICER GUILT if the recording device was disabled. frizzled Jan 2016 #11
Good thing the video was working otherwise greiner3 Jan 2016 #12
Wasn't the video from the Burger King? Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #17
Yes Kber Jan 2016 #18
Duh. Of course. There are no repercussions for breaking/turning off dashcams. There should be valerief Jan 2016 #15
Is there a way? atreides1 Jan 2016 #16
I'd do a few things Aerows Jan 2016 #19

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. If I were on the jury, I'd take that as evidence of premeditation.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

There's no reason to damage your cam or the audio unless you're planning to commit criminal actions.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
13. Huge agree here.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jan 2016

And add Destruction of Evidence to the list of charges, if any. It does show that he was planning something he knew was wrong, but didn't want anyone to find out about it.


"Yes, sir, I shredded those tax documents. But they were boring, and I didn't want to bother the auditor from the IRS. We good, right?"

nyabingi

(1,145 posts)
14. You're absolutely right
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jan 2016

This should be seen as murder in the first degree and I don't see how it can be viewed any other way.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
2. It's amazing how many police cameras suddenly quit working when the cops are breaking the law.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

I don't believe in that kind of coincidence.

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
4. Let's face it,
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:41 AM
Jan 2016

we have a corrupt justice system from the bottom up and top down. Why are these Dash Cams etc., left vulnerable to destruction by the police officers that use them. You would think that there would be a way to program these items so that any corruption of the service would send a signal to the police tech department, and that signal would require the office to bring the car in immediately, or something to that effect.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
6. Yes, and it should mean instant loss of employment and loss of all pension benefits....
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jan 2016

Those are the things that are important to most police department employees.

 

frizzled

(509 posts)
11. We need AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION OF OFFICER GUILT if the recording device was disabled.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

That would stop this kind of crap from happening pretty quick.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
15. Duh. Of course. There are no repercussions for breaking/turning off dashcams. There should be
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jan 2016

a law that if dashcam/bodycam aren't working, they cannot pursue suspects. Period.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
16. Is there a way?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jan 2016

Can the dashcam be connected to the vehicle ignition system, and if tampered with the vehicle won't start!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
19. I'd do a few things
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:57 PM
Jan 2016

1. Camera failure with a suspect injured during arrest means automatic leave until the matter is thoroughly investigated.

2. If convicted of tampering with the camera, incarceration.

3. Hidden additional camera that officers are unaware of.

#3 would bust those that damaged their known camera while still collecting data. You would have to keep a very tight lip on the fact that an additional camera is installed, though. Maybe utilize the existing wiring harness/areas that are already factory installed for services like OnStar which are disabled or not implemented in police fleet vehicles.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Cop Who Killed Laquan...