Clinton, Sanders war over Wall Street escalates
Source: CNN
Rindge, New Hampshire (CNN)The war over Wall Street between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton escalated Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union," where both candidates defended their records.
Clinton repeated her accusation that Sanders and his campaign are engaged in an "artistic smear" by using innuendo against her.
Sanders, for his part, declined to join calls -- including from his own spokeswoman -- for Clinton to release transcripts of her paid speeches to big banks, but he didn't reject those calls either.
CNN's Jake Tapper asked Clinton about the implication from the Sanders campaign that Clinton changed her vote on a bankruptcy bill fifteen years ago as a senator.
<more>
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/07/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-banks-speeches-south-carolina-new-hampshire/
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Appearance was ugly. Flat out basically said fuck the voters on her transcripts. She said everyone that ever gave a paid speech must first release them and then she would think about releasing them. She was very angry on that show.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)Wow. Not good.
It was ugly for her, bad appearance.
antigop
(12,778 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Just release the fucking transcripts HILL!
But of course, you won't because you are hiding what you said!
Period.
She's a mess.
madokie
(51,076 posts)even covers what she is. After watching the last debate I wonder what it is that she is trying to hide. Is it something in the emails, is it something she's been telling the bankers, is it something she's promised the wall street crooks, what is it?
Hillary just come clean and let the chips fall where they may. I know if I was in her position and I was squeaky clean thats exactly what I'd do. My suspicion is there is something there in some of this or she wouldn't be so easy to rile up. She was extremely riled up in that debate and it wasn't the context of what she implied it was either. There's something that the Clinton's are hiding, she and he. Other wise it would simply be like water off a ducks back. All this controversy that is.
It wasn't so there is!
In this neck of the woods if you mention her name, no matter where you are or who you're around the first thing you'll hear is I don't trust her. Why is that I wonder?
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)the right to hear what you tell the biggest financial backers of you election campaign. The same people who have brought you and Bill from the poor house to a net worth of over $100,000,000! Get real! This screams that she is hiding the evidence that she is giving the quid pro quo for all of that money!!!