Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 06:51 PM Feb 2016

Gun purchase background check mandate question qualifies for Maine ballot

Source: Bangor Daily News

AUGUSTA, Maine — A question asking Maine voters to expand firearms background checks will appear on the November 2016 ballot.

The secretary of state’s office on Thursday announced that a coalition of groups seeking to place the citizens’ initiative on the ballot had submitted enough valid signatures to achieve that goal. State election officials validated 65,821 signatures — more than the 61,123 threshold required for ballot placement.

The petitions for An Act to Require Background Checks for Gun Sales had been in circulation since October 2015.

The background check question will join citizens’ initiatives seeking to implement ranked-choice voting in state elections and to raise the state minimum wage on the November ballot.

<more>

Read more: http://bangordailynews.com/2016/02/18/politics/gun-purchase-background-check-mandate-question-qualifies-for-maine-ballot/



Th LePew/TP anti-poor-people-increased-property-tax initiative FAILED - it will not be on the ballot this Nov.

What will be?

Recreational MJ

Increased minimum wage

Ranked choice voting

Background checks for Holy Gunz sales.

The Backlash is ON.

yup



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun purchase background check mandate question qualifies for Maine ballot (Original Post) jpak Feb 2016 OP
Numerous Problems with 2016 Maine Universal Background Check Referendum alex_giger Mar 2016 #1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141320917#post1 alex_giger Mar 2016 #2
Spam Spam SPAAAAM Wonderful Spam!!!!11 jpak Mar 2016 #3
jury results merrily Mar 2016 #5
Sportsmen step up to support extending firearms background checks jpak Mar 2016 #4
Sportsman's Alliance of Maine position on Universal Background Check Referendum alex_giger Mar 2016 #7
LOL - SAM is a GOP/NRA club and does not speak for Maine Sportspeople jpak Mar 2016 #8
Link to the actual text (PDF) ManiacJoe Mar 2016 #6

alex_giger

(27 posts)
1. Numerous Problems with 2016 Maine Universal Background Check Referendum
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:25 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Wed Apr 13, 2016, 06:05 AM - Edit history (1)

Dear Readers,

There are numerous problems with this upcoming Universal Background Check (UBC) Referendum. Below is a partial list of the consequences of this gun control proposal.

1. The fact is that this would take away freedoms, and impose time and money costs, on Mainers who have traditionally exercised their private sale and transfer freedoms responsibly.

2. The fact is that this referendum goes way beyond gun SALES, and also controls all but a few narrowly defined gun TRANSFERS.

For example, loaning a gun for a couple of weeks to the trusted victim of domestic abuse for personal protection would require a trip to a gun dealer to process the "transfer" - both coming AND going.

3. The fact is that police and prosecutors are already overburdened, and creating a whole new class of "victim-less crime" UBC "criminals" has no realistic chance of being fairly and uniformly enforced or prosecuted. Please see Portland Press Herald Letter to the Editor dated 02/11/16, and Bangor Daily News Letter to the Editor dated 02/08/16.

4. The fact is that young people aged 18-20 would have a de-facto handgun ban imposed on them by this referendum; without any debate, due process, or discussion. Please see SUN JOURNAL Letter to the Editor dated 02/04/16, and Bangor Daily News Letter to the Editor dated 04/13/16.

5. The fact is that former NYC Mayor Bloomberg is behind this referendum. He paid for the signature gathering, getting it on the ballot, and he will pay the millions to promote it via ads, direct mail, TV commercials, etc. He has made a mockery of the citizen's initiative process in Maine.

There are many other problems with the referendum, but I will leave the reader to ponder these five (5) concern areas on their journey to really, really understanding what this gun control referendum is about.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. jury results
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:02 PM
Mar 2016

This guy is stalking me.

He is digging up my old posts and posting the same screed.
the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The author's post are not to "old" threads. The author's posts are on topic. Yes, jpak is frequently on the losing side of the debate. Not hide worthy.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No way that any juror can verify your claim. Post in ATA and/or put the poster on ignore.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am not getting in the middle of a feud between two posters, even though I find the talking points in this post to be totally right wing NRA bullshit.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

jpak

(41,758 posts)
4. Sportsmen step up to support extending firearms background checks
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:57 PM
Mar 2016
https://georgesoutdoornews.bangordailynews.com/2016/01/19/legislative-news/sportsmen-step-up-to-support-extending-firearms-background-checks/

Two accomplished and popular leaders of sportsmen have stepped up to support extension of background checks to all gun sales in Maine. Bucky Owen and Bill Vail, former Commissioners of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, will lead a group of sportsmen who support the initiative.

At a Tuesday morning press conference, representatives of the group, Maine Moms Demand Action, stood in front of boxes filled with petitions bearing the signatures of 85,436 citizens from all 503 Maine cities and towns, an impressive effort. One third of the signatures came from Maine’s Second Congressional District.

Jackie Sartoris, a MMDA volunteer, reported their polling found that 80 percent of Maine voters support the initiative. At the press conference, Bucky Owen noted that he’s been a lifelong hunter, angler, and gun owner. “We have a proud heritage of responsible gun ownership,” said Owen, a resident of Orono. “I believe strongly in the Second Amendment,” he said, “and in keeping guns out of the hands of the wrong people. This initiative includes safeguards for us and will not lead to gun registration,” he concluded.

The Act to Require Criminal Background Checks for Gun Sales requires background checks for all gun sales, with some notable exceptions. For those of us who are sportsmen, the most important exceptions are these. No background checks are required “while hunting or trapping if such activity is legal in all places where the transferee possesses the firearm and the transferee holds any license or permit required for such activity.”

<more>

alex_giger

(27 posts)
7. Sportsman's Alliance of Maine position on Universal Background Check Referendum
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 08:31 PM
Mar 2016

NOTE: This organization is the largest hunter and gun owner organization in Maine.

Sportsman's Alliance of Maine Statement – Universal Background Check Initiative
January 20, 2016

The Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine has vigorously and consistently opposed initiatives to expand background checks to private sales for many reasons – including our legitimate concern that such a system could easily become a national registry. There is no reason to believe these concerns are any less relevant today than they have been in the past.

Although the SAM Board has not taken an official position in opposition to this newest initiative (as the signatures turned in yesterday still need to be certified by the Secretary of the State), it is extremely likely that we will maintain our position and oppose the referendum.

The reason we are writing this statement today is due to a blog written by George Smith, who was the Executive Director of SAM up until 2010. This blog appears to support a referendum (link to blog: https://georgesoutdoornews.bangordailynews.com/…/sportsmen…/ ), and Mr. Smith’s continued reference to his former position with SAM has caused great confusion amongst our membership.

We recently polled our members, and well over 80% oppose any expansion of background checks to private sales. While it is still early in the process, given the current confusion we feel compelled to clarify that George Smith no longer works for, is not in any way associated with, and does not speak for the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine. We hope this clears up any confusion.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun purchase background c...