Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:33 PM Feb 2016

Appeals court rejects District’s request to revisit D.C. gun-control case

Source: Washington Post

A federal appeals court announced Friday that it will not revisit some of the District’s strict gun registration requirements that it struck down last fall.

A majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted against rehearing the case as a full panel. The decision upholds an earlier three-judge ruling that knocked down the city’s one-gun-per-month law, while upholding the government’s authority to issue gun regulations that promote public safety.

In denying the city’s request, Judge Patricia A. Millett — who has been mentioned as a potential nominee to replace Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia — sought to clarify her vote on a controversial topic. Millett wrote that the city had failed to fully show in court how some of its registration requirements — particularly a 15-question test on local gun laws — were sufficiently related to the government’s interest in promoting public safety.


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-rejects-districts-request-to-revisit-dc-gun-control-case/2016/02/26/d9cee2de-dca4-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court rejects District’s request to revisit D.C. gun-control case (Original Post) TeddyR Feb 2016 OP
'upholding the government’s authority to issue gun regulations that promote public safety. elleng Feb 2016 #1
GUNS! FUCK YEAH! onehandle Feb 2016 #2
You seem inappropriately TeddyR Feb 2016 #3
"Online enthusiasm" is pretty much the sum total of gun control advocacy these days friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #4

elleng

(130,980 posts)
1. 'upholding the government’s authority to issue gun regulations that promote public safety.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:29 PM
Feb 2016

In denying the city’s request, Judge Patricia A. Millett — who has been mentioned as a potential nominee to replace Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia — sought to clarify her vote on a controversial topic. Millett wrote that the city had failed to fully show in court how some of its registration requirements — particularly a 15-question test on local gun laws — were sufficiently related to the government’s interest in promoting public safety.'

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
4. "Online enthusiasm" is pretty much the sum total of gun control advocacy these days
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:49 PM
Feb 2016

That sort don't 'do'

...GOTV

...appearing at political meetings/hearings on their own dime

...spending their own money

They are, however, skilled at waiting for a authoritarian billionaire to decide what to do

The most used 'gun control advocacy device' these days is this:



It's the perfect device for the modern gun control advocate- it costs nothing, and only
requires the double click of a mouse...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court rejects Dis...