Clinton thunders to big win in South Carolina
Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:42 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: MSNBC
Hillary Clinton will win a landslide victory in South Carolinas Democratic primary Saturday, NBC News projects.
Clinton defeated Bernie Sanders by double digits, dominating the minority vote in the diverse southern state and showcasing a broad coalition thats expected to deliver another series of victories for her when Democrats in 11 more states head to the polls on Tuesday.
Clinton had long led by a wide margin in polling of the Palmetto State, where African American voters make up more than half of the Democratic electorate. Sanders did not appear in the state at all Saturday, campaigning instead in Texas and Minnesota as voters in South Carolina headed to the polls.
The former secretary of state bested Sanders by particularly wide margins among black voters and women, while Sanders more narrowly led among white voters and young people.
Read more: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-thunders-big-win-south-carolina
[img][/img]
Hillary may end up with a nearly 50 POINT LEAD!
Kingofalldems
(38,469 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)obamanut2012
(26,111 posts)So they could get a bunch of ads in, first.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)This is the landslide numbers Hillary can and will produce in Nov...
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Democratic Party.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Thanks Clinton and DWS.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)This one is not, despite a lot of noise.
kjones
(1,053 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)won in a GE in SC?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)And I don't think this will be the year either if Barack Obama couldn't even pull it off.
Response to sadoldgirl (Reply #9)
Name removed Message auto-removed
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)Sanders victories are perfectly valid.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)The racism is clear.
Just wanted to point this out.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)kjones
(1,053 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)It's getting very crowded under the bus.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)The environment around here is scary sometimes but I don't know what life is like in the real world.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)experienced the same when they are HRC and not supporting Sanders.
We've been discussing this in various AA circles. For instance, in my AA Book Club.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)especially around here.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I'd read he was a tough sell within the African-American community and I'm guessing the BernieBros have something to do with it (I'm guessing the guy that made the call to Scott is a BB). Also from this article, it seems that the Sanders campaign isn't aware of the politics of race politics.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)The AA community doesn't deserve what you're getting here on DU. There is no excuse for the racism we're seeing here; I don't care who they're supporting.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Just like Obama didn't, only way worse, if she is our nominee. Bernie would do much better in the GE than she will in all the southern states, but no Dem is going to get SC in the GE.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)and besides when Trump rolls out the Goldman transcripts and we see she was lying all along yucking it up with the bankers and half of the Democratic voters supports starts to say hey if this were out there during the Primaries we would have Bernie Sanders as the nominee, well let's just say the DNC demand that we circle those wagons and defend her lying ass just isn't going to happen... but I digress of course those transcripts may show nothing at all worth getting worked up over, wonder why she is choosing to ignore the will of Democratic voters ??? Please some Hillary supporter give me a reasonable explanation....
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but if you look at the stats the big winner in SC was Donald Trump with 50 delegates - I seriously hope it's NOT a predictor of next November - TTFN
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=sc%20primary&eob=m.06yxd/R/2/short/m.06yxd/
William769
(55,147 posts)No revolution in S.C. Same thing for Super Tuesday.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)as are some future losses
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)The Dems divide theirs based on vote percentages.
ultragreen
(53 posts)Hekate
(90,779 posts)...vacation from DU? Because of the TOS.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)I would have posted something kind in the Sanders group, but I've been blocked.
Though I lean Clinton, I do want Senator Sanders to keep trucking along.
The debate is good for the party and country. I just hope we can all stick together come November.
obamanut2012
(26,111 posts)man4allcats
(4,026 posts)until then I'm supporting Bernie as the better choice.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)As I've said many times, I won't hesitate to vote for Sen. Sanders if he gets the nod.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Please tell as many people as you know to demand she release the Goldman speech transcripts.... because once she is the nominee and Trump gets his hands on them how in the heck will the DNC expect us to unify?
ThreeWayFanny
(80 posts)..... her damn goldman speech .
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Million strong are nobody too... I wonder why Hillary supporters can't answer that question on the merits?
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Hekate
(90,779 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Bernie Sanders has never made a wall street speech where he earned six figures, so all of the other candidates don't have what your candidate does, so you still want to stand by some ridiculous fairness argument, no wonder people think you Hill supporters are all sycophants.
Corey_Baker08
(2,157 posts)The only people talking about this are Sanders supporters on DU.
My idea for unity is why don't the Sanders Supporters Lift Bernie Up Instead of tearing Hillary down?
Matt_R
(456 posts)not for someone offering condolences. Or so I've been told, when a Hillary group post ends up on the front page.
TM99
(8,352 posts)But what are the vote counts? Where are the voter demographics? What are the delegate breakdowns? 53 delegates are up for grab. Hillary lost NH decisively but still left with 9 delegates.
Does anyone have any real numbers yet?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)you REALLY asking?
John K
(80 posts)According to what is on MSNBC
Clinton has 76 pledged delegates after 4 primaries/caucuses and Sanders has 60.
So the reality is that this is still a race. On to Super Tuesday.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)After Tuesday this will be OVER.
TM99
(8,352 posts)He has the money and the support to go all the way to the convention.
Hillary in 2008 stayed in months after she had 'lost'. Sanders deserves to do the same, don't you agree? Or are you a hypocrite?
sweetloukillbot
(11,062 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)As usual.
And reports as if the various sets of voters referred to are mutually-exclusive (black, white, women, young...(I'd like to see more detailed stats on the 'young' vote (which demographic, complicating the message for MSM employees, presumably includes all ethnic and sexual categories in the referenced age group))).
Spin on.
She won the black vote. But she lost the 18-29 vote. So obviously she didn't win the black 18-29 vote.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)So, 'young' in this context means under 30? Can we see a breakdown on that 'demographic', in all states as they come in, please?
TM99
(8,352 posts)just after the polls closed.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/27/us/elections/south-carolina-democrat-poll.html
You will have to go back and look for the other states. For example, while Hillary won the Hispanic counties in NV, she actually lost the overall Hispanic vote by almost 10 percent.
erlewyne
(1,115 posts)I belong to the 99% and am proud of it!
ashtonelijah
(340 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)erlewyne
(1,115 posts)I am proud to be in the 24%
I proudly pay taxes and vote. I do not want to be in the 1%
You have a rough lot, being down there. Glad you're here on DU, so we can help provide support to a fellow dem!
GreydeeThos
(958 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)C'mon. Hoist a toast for Hillary's people tonight and move on to the next one.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)What you didn't have a Hitler Photoshop available?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Enjoy your offensive photoshop while I enjoy a quiet beer to celebrate the primary results.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)with tequila
Laser102
(816 posts)I do love a good cognac. I'm up there also.
harun
(11,348 posts)point that picking Hillary will help Trump. That is all I was trying to say.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)mcar
(42,372 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)Posted in very poor taste regardless of your support.
Do you think Bernie would approve of this kind of crap? I don't think so.
harun
(11,348 posts)Happened across this gif and linked to it, not my work.
hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)n/t
kwassa
(23,340 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)I posted your (** uh **] artwork on my Facebook page with a congratulatory message."
Beacool
(30,250 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Some of the demographic spreads are staggering. This points to a giant Super Tuesday for the Clinton campaign.
Zorro
(15,749 posts)PennsylvaniaMatt
(966 posts)I thought a 20-25 point lead would be a blowout victory for her. Now looks like it will be a 40 point lead! Tuesday will be a very good night for her!
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)Did people expect this to be close?
African Americans make up 55 percent of the Democratic electorate. All white South Carolinians voted in the GOP primary.
What will be news are will the Republicans win over 10 percent of the vote if Trump is the nominee?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)two truisms:
First, Southern and Western states are more populous and diverse, a true reflection of the Democratic Party electorate.
and
Second, NO Democratic Party candidate--I don't care if it's Jesus H. Christ himself--can win ANY nomination without the support of a sizable portion of minority voters or women.
HRC seems to be doing amazingly well with both demographics.
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)I lean Sanders, but it doesn't mean he will win. I just have problems with your gal Hillary.
I don't see a major message or theme for the fall campaign except for "the other guys are worse." That's not enough.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)jalan48
(13,881 posts)We still have a long ways to go but tonight is your turn to celebrate.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)those of us who support neither candidate.
houston16revival
(953 posts)even if you have to view it as an anti-Republican vote
The supporters of both sides would complement one another
if they could focus on the common enemy
Trump is trying to roll everything, end the EPA
Is there a dumber idea?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)TrueDemVA
(250 posts)I know several friends who are Bernie or bust and I can't blame them. Hillary may do well in low turnout dem primaries, but in the General I fear a lot of people with either not show up or vote for the other side due to character issues on Hillary.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)That's just despicable.
houston16revival
(953 posts)Dems need every voter. Not voting is still a choice, to allow Trump or Rubio
in the White House. Do it for the EPA
Hekate
(90,779 posts)....and don't know what is really at stake here beyond the anger so many feel. It isn't all about you.
but good luck anyway
TrueDemVA
(250 posts)I didn't say I wasn't going to vote. Just saying I can understand that feeling of being tired of voting for the lesser of two evils. I mean you have to admit the there is a lot of saying one thing then lobbying behind the scenes for something different. I'm just saying it is frustrating.
jalan48
(13,881 posts)mcar
(42,372 posts)Thank you.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)It ain't over, but tonight is yours.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Still not voting for her if she's the nominee
arlington.mass
(41 posts)I'm sorry, but as a "progressive" who believes in pie in the sky ideas like universal health care, tuition free public universities for qualified students, a living wage for workers, and an end to endless war, I could never vote for HRC
creeksneakers2
(7,476 posts)believe?
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)Even with blacks
MBS
(9,688 posts)that 2008 was a three-candidate race. The inclusion of Edwards in 2008 meant that no single candidate could have racked up the kind of percentage points seen tonight.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Second, Obama was still a virtual unknown, so the name recognition factor.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Congrats to Clinton
Congratulations Sec Clinton!
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Amy and Al will be stomping for Hillary as well.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)If he wins, he'll have to win on a massive scale to make a difference. I can't say that it'll happen. But I could be wrong, of course.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I think he has to win all four.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)Onward to November!!!!
Corey_Baker08
(2,157 posts)Response to onehandle (Original post)
Post removed
elmac
(4,642 posts)the independents will go for Trump. Better be a HUGH voting turnout or its President Trump in 17.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)nominee that can win the GE against trump.... but it sure is looking like the establishment is going balls out to make sure Hillary wins.
SciDude
(79 posts)OH... wait.
I think people can wait to start congratulating the oligarchs for retaining their stranglehold on power in America until after she wins the nomination. A lot can and will happen between now and then (if it happens).
elmac
(4,642 posts)low turn out today compared to double for the fascists. 350,000 dems VS 740,000 went to the polls. Same pattern will continue so not looking too good for the GE.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)ultragreen
(53 posts)Congratulations, Hillary supporters!
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)to defend her, and her Wall Street buddies in the GE.... so get ready for that, doncha know...
andrewv1
(168 posts)Not a Lot of Class being shown here for a Deep South State that hasn't gone Democratic in the MAIN Presidential Election in over 30 years!
Wake Up....Hillary has an unfavorable rating of almost 60% throughout the country & three FBI investigations with her name on it...
Betting odds?
Not Good.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)But by almost 50 points??? This was an ass-whipping plain and simple!
Onward, Hillraisers. Super Tuesday is next up for the taking!
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)Not so long ago in a Democratic primary to determine the Dem candidate to run for senator I believe, Alvin Greene, a black guy who did absolutely no campaigning, just filed to run and nobody in the state knew him from Adam. He was and still is a complete nonentity, who also had some criminal problems as well, the details of which I don't recall now. The guy running against him was a well-known and well-liked judge who did a good bit of campaigning to make sure he won the primary. But it did no good since he was running not only against Greene but against the ES&S Ivotronic vote theft machines. Greene won with 2/3's of the vote. In the early and absentee voting where paper was used, the judge did quite well, winning by an even greater margin I believe than Green won with the assistance of the Ivotronics.
The Democratic Party of SC, careful as always not to offend anybody or hurt anybody's feelings, refused to demand a re-run of the election, even tho in the Democratic discussions of the election results, a number of computer experts testified that the results were almost certainly a result of some sort of computer malfunction or programming problem. The logical thing to do would have been to demand the primary be run again using hand-counted paper ballots, but of course, the Dem Party has never in recent years been too concerned about logic or even about winning and losing too much as long as they could have a nice looking election that people could be proud of, and as long as nobody's feelings were hurt. To investigate something as obvious as a computer problem, whether just a machine malfunction or something else like (God Forbid) a computer maliciously programmed or hacked in some way to get the good judge out of the way for Lindsey Graham or whoever the Repub was he was going to run against, would be unseemly and untidy.
So I wouldn't entirely trust the results of the HRC vs Bernie vote. I think the same machines are still being used in SC now that were used in the Alvin Greene victory, tho I may be wrong. It could be HRC didn't win by as great a margin as the machines indicated, or it could be she won by an even greater margin. In fact, it could even be that Bernie actually won. There's really no way to know when the vote is counted on these machines and the vote is never audited and when, even in cases where a problem is as obvious as the nose on your face, nothing is ever done to make sure the vote is accurately counted.
Hekate
(90,779 posts)I am loving this.
Corey_Baker08
(2,157 posts)Talk About A Revolution...