Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:09 PM Mar 2016

Chief justice rejects plea to block air pollution rule

Source: The Hill

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rejected a plea Thursday to block a contentious air pollution rule for power plants in a big victory for the Obama administration.

Roberts’s order came despite his court’s 5-4 decision last year ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation, known as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, is illegal.

Michigan led a group of 20 states last month — empowered by the Supreme Court’s recent unprecedented decision to halt the EPA’s carbon dioxide rule for power plants — in asking the court to live up to its ruling last year and block the regulation’s enforcement.

“Unless this court stays or enjoins further operation of the Mercury and Air Toxics rule, this court’s recent decision in Michigan v. EPA will be thwarted,” the states wrote in a Feb. 23 filing with the court.

“A stay or injunction is appropriate because this court has already held that the finding on which the rule rests in unlawful and beyond EPA’s statutory authority.”




Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/271614-chief-justice-rejects-plea-to-block-air-pollution-rule



A win for the Obama Administration!!!!
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chief justice rejects plea to block air pollution rule (Original Post) Historic NY Mar 2016 OP
Huh, since Scalia is gone maybe? Ligyron Mar 2016 #1
I don't think the Tea Party has done any favors for Conservative John Roberts PatrynXX Mar 2016 #8
Who knows houston16revival Mar 2016 #2
Wonder what criteria Scalia used?..... Historic NY Mar 2016 #9
A win for the American people !! SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #3
I'm liking the "new" Supremes! FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #4
Haha, Laugh-In? MgtPA Mar 2016 #5
But of course. FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #6
Good times. MgtPA Mar 2016 #7

Ligyron

(7,632 posts)
1. Huh, since Scalia is gone maybe?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:19 PM
Mar 2016

With him out of the way maybe Roberts feels somehow less constrained?

Interesting and encouraging development!

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
8. I don't think the Tea Party has done any favors for Conservative John Roberts
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 04:39 PM
Mar 2016

So he might be a bit pissed about it so. he might still be Conservative but he's no Tea Party.. So he gave them the shit end of the stick

houston16revival

(953 posts)
2. Who knows
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

Could be anything ... pro-life and poisoning incompatible ... just about
knew the case would be 4-4 and how inefficient to spend all that time
and bother to hear the arguments and rule on it ... the hard work scientists
and the Administration did is impressive ... reading public opinion on the
Court ...

Presidents can appoint Justices, and screen them and filter them ... but the
younger a Justice, the more personal change can happen in the years ahead.
Enlightenment can come late, opinions can grow, knowledge increases

Things that are in the long run best interests of the country and are just about
proven and economically efficient should pass muster.

Wonder what criteria Scalia used?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chief justice rejects ple...