Chief justice rejects plea to block air pollution rule
Source: The Hilll
Chief justice rejects plea to block air pollution rule
6.2K34
1847
Greg Nash
By Timothy Cama - 03/03/16 10:35 AM EST
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rejected a plea Thursday to block a contentious air pollution rule for power plants in a big victory for the Obama administration.
Robertss order came despite his courts 5-4 decision last year ruling that the Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) regulation, known as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, is illegal.
Michigan led a group of 20 states last month empowered by the Supreme Courts recent unprecedented decision to halt the EPAs carbon dioxide rule for power plants in asking the court to live up to its ruling last year and block the regulations enforcement.
Unless this court stays or enjoins further operation of the Mercury and Air Toxics rule, this courts recent decision in Michigan v. EPA will be thwarted, the states wrote in a Feb. 23 filing with the court.
A stay or injunction is appropriate because this court has already held that the finding on which the rule rests in unlawful and beyond EPAs statutory authority..................
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/271614-chief-justice-rejects-plea-to-block-air-pollution-rule
Dean Barker Retweeted
The Hill @thehill 6h6 hours ago
BREAKING: Chief justice rejects plea to block air pollution rule in big victory for Obama http://hill.cm/LajjaX4
randys1
(16,286 posts)of APPOINTING not nominating a justice?
I wonder if our attorneys here have another answer.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)The handwriting is already on the wall as to replacement of Scalia. Roberts legacy will be his only concern going forward. He will throw Thomas and Alito's bullshit under the bus and Kennedy will also be a go along with the majority. That's just another reason this election looms so large.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)congress and forces at work...
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Republican dreams of unfettered capitalism takes one on the chin!
Scalia's absence noted already?