Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raggaemon

(68 posts)
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:04 PM Apr 2016

Sanders disavows surrogate's corporate "whore" remark

Source: The Hill

"Medicare-for-all will never happen if we continue to elect corporate Democratic whores who are all beholden to big pharma and the private insurance industry instead of us" - Paul Song.

Read more: Link to source



I'm puzzled that the Sanders campaign is distancing itself from these comments made by a Bernie Sanders surrogate, but still there has been no response from the campaign regarding Sanders surrogate professor Cornel West calling president Obama, " the first Niggerized president" a comment West made on TV ?

Dr. West also said that president Obama is a "Rockefeller republican in blackface", should it be taken that Bernie Sanders agrees with Cornel West, since they've not taken the same steps of disavowing his vile attacks ?
61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders disavows surrogate's corporate "whore" remark (Original Post) Raggaemon Apr 2016 OP
I will take this a lot more seriously when Hillary distances herself from big money. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #1
Quick! Turn on the white noise machine... Human101948 Apr 2016 #2
Oh fer chrissake! The word has several meanings- leave it to the followers of the 100,000,100 Peregrine Took Apr 2016 #29
Those big donation events being held by Hillary are to fund stopbush Apr 2016 #13
Blady dee blah blah blah Kalidurga Apr 2016 #15
President Hillary Clinton. stopbush Apr 2016 #17
Won't happen Kalidurga Apr 2016 #18
Let's talk in November. stopbush Apr 2016 #19
Good luck with the BOB's n Indies Kalidurga Apr 2016 #20
The Indies don't really matter in a GE. stopbush Apr 2016 #22
Your facts are out of date Kalidurga Apr 2016 #27
Wrong. See here: stopbush Apr 2016 #49
'Get used to it' navarth Apr 2016 #32
And as Bush breathed oxygen as do you, do we make the same spurious correlation? LanternWaste Apr 2016 #56
Well gosh-a-rootie navarth Apr 2016 #58
Be plenty of time for that after the primary is finished and paid for. Sunlei Apr 2016 #52
Really? Think about it: stopbush Apr 2016 #54
Hillary team grasoing @ straws Rockyj Apr 2016 #24
There have been several statements which should not have been said, Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #3
Cut the crap, will ya? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #5
Using that logic, ... scscholar Apr 2016 #7
Yet again Sanders rises above his faux supporters. joshcryer Apr 2016 #6
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #8
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #12
Double Standards Plucketeer Apr 2016 #9
Has Hillary publically apologized yet for her participation in "CPT-Colored People Time" appalachiablue Apr 2016 #10
Full context of that comment (and it doesn't make it better, either) MADem Apr 2016 #11
There is no irony in being a minority shareholder in a pharmaceutical company or having a senior JDPriestly Apr 2016 #23
Dr. Song's WIFE is probably ready to kill him. MADem Apr 2016 #34
We Democrats have a lot of corporate whores in our Party. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #38
He was talking about Hillary Clinton and that's why Sanders finally apologized. nt MADem Apr 2016 #39
Face it. Corporate whores are what stand between us and a fair tax system, a healthy JDPriestly Apr 2016 #14
They are also the ones standing between us and a conservative Supreme Court beastie boy Apr 2016 #28
They are the ones that DELIVER a conservative Supreme Court. navarth Apr 2016 #33
Elena kagan? Sonia Sotomayor? Ruth Bader Ginsburg? Stephen Breyer? beastie boy Apr 2016 #35
eww navarth Apr 2016 #36
And?... beastie boy Apr 2016 #41
Are you asking me navarth Apr 2016 #42
It is pretty obvious what I am asking. But in case you still need a clarification... beastie boy Apr 2016 #48
sounds like a new question navarth Apr 2016 #50
You must have missed Post #33 by some dude going by the name of navarth beastie boy Apr 2016 #53
Of course this is possible. navarth Apr 2016 #55
I referred to two Democratic presidents who appointed all of the current Supreme Court justices. beastie boy Apr 2016 #57
LOL navarth Apr 2016 #59
You just crossed the line between annoying and batshit ridiculous. Buh bye. beastie boy Apr 2016 #60
trolls don't like getting trolled. navarth Apr 2016 #61
3 posts in 90 days, 53 in 4 years, and you save it all up for this? corkhead Apr 2016 #16
Some of us appear to have a life outside of DU. Outrageous, isn't it? beastie boy Apr 2016 #30
"Corporate Whore" sounds sexist. I think "Corporate Tool" is a better description. fbc Apr 2016 #21
Or sell-out. Or shill. You're right that any term with the word whore is sexist. pnwmom Apr 2016 #25
HE used the wrong word, should be sorry and is. The focus by liberals, however, should Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #26
I'm pissed about MSNBC's coverage on this issue: Andrea Mitchell Greenspan> again YOHABLO Apr 2016 #31
He criticized Hillary in one sentence and in the very next sentence referred to Corporate democratic pnwmom Apr 2016 #40
clear to you. quite frankly I don't care if others found it offensive. I'm glad he said it. YOHABLO Apr 2016 #43
Bernie himself tweeted that it was insensitive and inappropriate and was language that had no place pnwmom Apr 2016 #44
Do you even have a dictionary? FreedomRain Apr 2016 #37
Maybe you should tell the media that they should all check the meaning: pnwmom Apr 2016 #45
thanks for that tip FreedomRain Apr 2016 #46
West is black, so how can he be racist against his own race? Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #47
Good. Sanders doesn't want his 'followers' to call Mrs. Clinton a "corporate whore". Sunlei Apr 2016 #51

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. I will take this a lot more seriously when Hillary distances herself from big money.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:07 PM
Apr 2016

Until that time she isn't doing anyone in this country any favors except the 1%. Your problem with what was said is you have no actual defense for Hillary. So, you are relegated to only being able to be outraged by a word.

Peregrine Took

(7,415 posts)
29. Oh fer chrissake! The word has several meanings- leave it to the followers of the 100,000,100
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:15 PM
Apr 2016

million dollar woman to assume the gutteral definition.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
13. Those big donation events being held by Hillary are to fund
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:40 PM
Apr 2016

down-ticket Dem races, not her presidential campaign.

Sanders has done nothing for down ticket races, even though he agreed to do so when the DNC permitted him to run as a D.

Effing liar.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
15. Blady dee blah blah blah
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:46 PM
Apr 2016

She still changes what she says based on what she gets paid. So I don't care whose race she funds by cozying up to big money. She isn't and hasn't ever kept corporations that harm people in check. Your fracking Queen is in it for the money. I am so sorry it took someone speaking like that for you to get what she looks like to the rest of us, but there it is.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
22. The Indies don't really matter in a GE.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:58 PM
Apr 2016

Statistically, only 5% of people identifying as Independent are truly independent, ie: they will consider equally both the D and R candidate for president. The other 90% lean strongly - and equally - to either D or R. So they cancel each other out.

75% of Sanders voters say they will vote for Hillary. Of the 25% who may or may not, a subset of zealots definitely won't vote for Hillary, even if Sanders asks them to. So, you're talking maybe, maybe 4-5% of the Democratic side of the electoral populace unwilling to vote for Hillary, or roughly 2% of the voting public. That's a pretty small number, and a number that will be more than offset by Rs - especially women - who will cross over and vote for Hillary if Trump is the R nominee.

Not exactly a voting bloc that Hillary has to waste even a nanosecond recruiting. She will write them off, as she should. They will have no influence on the GE.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
32. 'Get used to it'
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:27 PM
Apr 2016

Sounds like what I used to hear about Bu$h, the one you profess to stop.

Conflict.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
56. And as Bush breathed oxygen as do you, do we make the same spurious correlation?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:42 PM
Apr 2016

"Sounds like what I used to hear about Bu$h..."

And as Bush breathed oxygen as do you, do we make the same spurious correlation? Or (and I find this a wee bit more likely), your statement is little more than a petulant bumper-sticker lacking any real or substantive meaning...

(space provided below to rationalize a distinction lacking a different and validate both your biases and your delicious logical fallacy)

navarth

(5,927 posts)
58. Well gosh-a-rootie
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:46 PM
Apr 2016

I'm just crushed. However I am comforted in the knowledge that you find my logical fallacy delicious!

I felt the same way last night when I heard the crowd in NY chanting Bernie's name. Yummy!

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
54. Really? Think about it:
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:40 PM
Apr 2016

if Sanders were to somehow win the nomination, he would be the beneficiary of the $15-million Hillary has already raised for the down-ticket races. Think about that when Sanders rails against Hillary raising huge amounts of $ from large donors. That $ is going to the down-ticket races.

Sanders has raised nothing for the down-ticket. No matter who ends up being the nominee, the down-ticket races would be in better financial shape had both candidates been out there raising $15-million each, rather than one candidate and only one candidate trying to help raise $ to elect a D-dominated Congress.

Such a lame, self-serving excuse for not giving a damn about the other Ds running in the fall.

Rockyj

(538 posts)
24. Hillary team grasoing @ straws
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:00 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary has a dozens suit cases full of crap, while Bernie may have a wallet full.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. There have been several statements which should not have been said,
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:08 PM
Apr 2016

Getting to the point of not being surprised at whatever is delivered anymore.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
4. Cut the crap, will ya?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:08 PM
Apr 2016

This stuff is getting old.

LBN, my backside. This nonsense has been going on all damned day..........

Response to Raggaemon (Original post)

Response to Raggaemon (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #8)

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
9. Double Standards
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:19 PM
Apr 2016

One can make a "CP" joke and laugh it off. But let a black person say something along those lines - watch out!

appalachiablue

(41,146 posts)
10. Has Hillary publically apologized yet for her participation in "CPT-Colored People Time"
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:21 PM
Apr 2016

the racially loaded and offensive code term used in the recent NY charity event 'Skit' that was vetted by her campaign? Don't tell me it's ok-that was a crude, coarse, bigoted and unnecessary expression, in very bad taste by any measure in our highly racist, violent and declining country.




MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. Full context of that comment (and it doesn't make it better, either)
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016
Now Secretary Clinton has said that Medicare for all will never happen. (boos) Well, I agree with Secretary Clinton that Medicare for all will never happen if we have a president who never aspires for something greater than the status quo. (cheers) Medicare for all will never happen if we continue to elect corporate Democratic whores (cheers] who are beholden to big pharma and the private insurance industry instead of us.”

Irony alert: Dr. Paul Y Song is a minority shareholder of BERG PHARMACEUTICAL CO. He used to have a senior leadership role in the company, he still serves as an advisor.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. There is no irony in being a minority shareholder in a pharmaceutical company or having a senior
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:58 PM
Apr 2016

leadership role in that company.

European countries have pharmaceutical companies but they still have universal, single payer insurance. I know that because I lived there and enjoyed the privilege of single payer, universal and AFFORDABLE insurance.

Dr. Song is an outstanding doctor, an oncologist as I understand it.

He did not specifically call Clinton a corporate whore, but politicians who take money from corporations (many of which do not pay their fair share of taxes) to corrupt our tax system, steal from us and our children and make us pay more for healthcare and accept worse results than other countries are corporate whores. Sorry if they hurts someone's feelings.

And remember this, it may hurt Democrats who take that dirty money to be called whores, but all they have to do is to pass reform of campaign finance law including a constitutional amendment that states that corporations are not people entitled to the right of free speech, and their corporate whoredom will end.

Let's change the campaign finance law.

The truth hurts. Those who take money from healthcare insurance companies, etc. who profit from the misery of the disabled and ill in order to get elected to political office are corporate whores.

If the shoe fits, wear it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
34. Dr. Song's WIFE is probably ready to kill him.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:38 PM
Apr 2016

Seeing as the woman he called a whore, her HUSBAND rescued his wife's sister from the clutches of North Korea.

What a tool Dr. Song is--he's plainly not the sharpest scalpel on the tray.


If you don't think he meant Clinton when he made that comment, you are naive.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
38. We Democrats have a lot of corporate whores in our Party.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

The behind the scenes stuff during the negotiation of the ACA was deplorable, cheap and, no, Paul Song was not necessarily talking about Hillary Clinton. He was talking about the Party overall.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. Face it. Corporate whores are what stand between us and a fair tax system, a healthy
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:45 PM
Apr 2016

banking system, good education, free tuition at state colleges and universities and technical schools, single payer, universal healthcare, a healthy and safe environment and above all peace and steps toward more economic equality.

So I see nothing wrong with the statement made by Paul Song, who is an expert on universal healthcare and an outstanding oncologist.

The Hillary supporters are feeling embarrassed because the truth hurts.

All that Hillary money did not come from little old retired people living on Social Security like me or our kids who struggle and worry about their jobs.

It comes from corporations -- deadbeat corporations who move our jobs overseas and refuse to pay a fair share of the taxes.

And those who take that money are corporate whores.

They sell their souls to get corporate money.

Bernie is the only one who is not doing that.

Go, Bernie.

Feel the Bern!

Let's have a cheer for Paul Song who tells the truth for a change.

beastie boy

(9,375 posts)
28. They are also the ones standing between us and a conservative Supreme Court
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:14 PM
Apr 2016

and everything you mentioned in your post never becoming a reality.


Flag waving and name calling is going to get you bobkes. Your only hope of seeing any of your agenda getting pushed through is Hillary.

beastie boy

(9,375 posts)
35. Elena kagan? Sonia Sotomayor? Ruth Bader Ginsburg? Stephen Breyer?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:39 PM
Apr 2016

Do these judges make SCOTUS conservative?

Yeah, sure. Disagree all you want. You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
36. eww
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:25 PM
Apr 2016

So Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and PBO are corporate whores eh? You are all topsy-turvy.

FWIW Elena Kagan has skeletons in her closet. Go argue with them.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/06/22/kaganaccomplice

beastie boy

(9,375 posts)
48. It is pretty obvious what I am asking. But in case you still need a clarification...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:09 AM
Apr 2016

My question is about how your comments negate the fact that ALL Supreme Court liberal judges were appointed by either Clinton or Obama.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
50. sounds like a new question
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:13 AM
Apr 2016

where did you say that?

I only saw where you said Corporate Whores put these SC Judges in place.

Please proceed.

beastie boy

(9,375 posts)
53. You must have missed Post #33 by some dude going by the name of navarth
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:34 AM
Apr 2016

and my reply to it (# 35)

Curiously, the post you missed is from someone using the same name and avatar as you... Just a coincidence, I suppose.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
55. Of course this is possible.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:37 PM
Apr 2016

As I remember it, you referred to 3 presidents as Corporate Whores. Maybe somebody else?

Again, please proceed.

beastie boy

(9,375 posts)
57. I referred to two Democratic presidents who appointed all of the current Supreme Court justices.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:44 PM
Apr 2016

You referred to them as corporate whores.

So to answer your question, yeah, it was someone else. You.

Or maybe some dude calling himself navarth who is so not you.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
26. HE used the wrong word, should be sorry and is. The focus by liberals, however, should
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:04 PM
Apr 2016

be on the fact that we need single payer.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
31. I'm pissed about MSNBC's coverage on this issue: Andrea Mitchell Greenspan> again
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 07:16 PM
Apr 2016

Today I heard her ..... tell complete lies about Song. He did not refer to Clinton specifically when he used the word ''whores'' otherwise he'd have used the word ''whore''. She also said that Lisa Ling, married to Song, was rescued by the Obama administration from N.Korea. NO it was her sister not Lisa. Why doesn't MSNBC get rid of her? I guess that's a rhetorical question. Notice how MSNBC has given all the true liberals who've stood their ground the ax. The kiss asses like Maddow, etc are still around. $$$$ love the money I guess.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
40. He criticized Hillary in one sentence and in the very next sentence referred to Corporate democratic
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016

whores. The link was clear.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
43. clear to you. quite frankly I don't care if others found it offensive. I'm glad he said it.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

because that's exactly what these DINOs are (no offense to sex workers)

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
44. Bernie himself tweeted that it was insensitive and inappropriate and was language that had no place
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:48 PM
Apr 2016

in political discourse.

But he has very little influence on his offensive followers.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
45. Maybe you should tell the media that they should all check the meaning:
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:54 PM
Apr 2016

Search results
Story image for bernie surrogate from ABC News

5 Times a Bernie Sanders Surrogate Has Gotten Him in Trouble
ABC News-11 hours ago

The Bernie Sanders campaign has apologized for comments from yet another one its surrogates, tweeting that a "corporate Democratic ...

The Lid: Bernie Sanders' Surrogate Problem
NBCNews.com-6 hours ago

Bernie Sanders Criticizes Surrogate's "Corporate Democratic ...
Opinion-U.S. News & World Report-9 hours ago

Sanders takes heat for surrogate's 'whores' remark
In-Depth-New York Post-13 hours ago

Sanders: 'No room' for language about 'corporate Democratic whores'
Blog-Politico (blog)-14 hours ago

Sanders Denounces Surrogate's 'Corporate Democratic Whores ...
Opinion-NPR-11 hours ago

Media image for bernie surrogate from NBCNews.com
NBCNews.com

Media image for bernie surrogate from Blue Nation Review
Blue Nation Review

Media image for bernie surrogate from U.S. News & World Report
U.S. News & World Report

Media image for bernie surrogate from TIME
TIME

Media image for bernie surrogate from New York Daily News
New York Daily News

Media image for bernie surrogate from AlterNet
AlterNet
Explore in depth (3,493 more articles)

Story image for bernie surrogate from Bloomberg
What's Behind Bernie Sanders' Surrogate Problem?
Bloomberg-3 hours ago

FreedomRain

(413 posts)
46. thanks for that tip
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:25 AM
Apr 2016

run the same search and put in Hillary Clinton instead of Bernie Sanders.

one case of the same sort of usage

2 cases referring to Bill as a surrogate, in the correct sense of the word

4 cases of referring to "Sanders surrogates"

and 3 cases where the words were used apart and unrelated to each other.

You have just proven beyond a doubt the misuse of the word is a media aberration with regard to Sanders.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
47. West is black, so how can he be racist against his own race?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

The niggerized comment was said in June, 2015, before West was ever considered a surrogate for Bernie's campaign. The blackface comment was in 2012.

I don't see why Bernie should get involved in Cornel Wests personal opinions of President Obama. If he said it right in front of Bernie I would expect him to say something, but not now.

And the whore comment is NOW and it looks really bad because of "we continue to elect corporate Democratic whores" could be construed as being directed specifically to Hillary Clinton. Even though the word whore is often meant as someone that takes money in a quid pro quo arrangement, it also has a very negative misogynist meaning to most people.

So yes, I think Bernie is correct to distance himself from that remark. If Cornel West were to say something today as a Bernie surrogate (if he indeed is one) I would expect Bernie to come down hard.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders disavows surrogat...