Bernie Sanders says private meeting with Pope Francis is not an endorsement
Source: Washington Post
ROME U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders met privately with Pope Francis during his overnight trip here, his spokesman said.
The brief meeting took place at the papal residence early Saturday, according to the senator's spokesman Michael Briggs.
"They discussed the issues that the senator raised that the pope has raised so often at the conference yesterday," Briggs said, adding that there was no discussion of U.S. politics or Sanders's candidacy.
"He said that there was radiance in his presence and that he was very honored and humbled to have the opportunity to meet with the pontiff."
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/16/italian-media-sanders-met-privately-with-pope-francis/
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Sanders chased the Pope down as he was walking to the plane, tackled the man and held him there for five minutes
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and sat on him,
840high
(17,196 posts)I heard he was hiding behind a potted plant and ambushed the pope.
George II
(67,782 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)why Sanders was invited to the conference and H. Clinton was not.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)nwnatural
(16 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Freudian Slip of things to come maybe ...
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)that crossed my mind as well...
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Someone posted Hillary's campaign logo next to Barry Goldwater's campaign logo a while back. There's a very distinct similarity: His was a white arrow on a red field.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]That one.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Goldwater was one of the most famous bigots of modern times
Duval
(4,280 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....it points to the left.
If you're not behind her, you're pointing to the right.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)above yours?
The Goldwater arrow points in the same direction as Hillary's. Goldwater was a sharp turn to the right at his time. Do you think the people behind him thought that he was veering left?
I don't think so. That is sheer . . . . . . . . . nonsense.
George II
(67,782 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....the most patriotic are also those who fly or display the confederate flag - symbolic of the biggest threat to the existence of the United States in our 240 year history.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)"The invitation to Sanders to address the Vatican conference raised eyebrows when it was announced last week and touched off allegations that the senator lobbied for the invitation.
But the chancellor for the pontifical academy, Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, said he invited Sanders because he was the only U.S. presidential candidate who showed deep interest in the teachings of Francis."
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)In response to every Hillary supporters posts. Somehow this escapes them.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Newkularblue
(130 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)that is pretty epic
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Syria, Honduras ...
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)it doesn't make them OR the candidate they think they are helping.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)with any factual evidence. It is pure spin, deflection, artful smears, and rat-fuckery.
She believes it. She says it. Therefore it must be true.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)lol at anyone this genuinely upsets, please, grow the fuck up. There are more important things to be upset over.
Like white noise machines for example.
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)Thank you. Thank you. I'll be here through Wednesday night, folks.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)*pant pant pant* Don't DO that Old Crow.... I can only laugh so much!
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)have offered the vatican her university rate...or maybe she could have had the Pope purchase just one plate at her California fund-raiser...only $33,400...
I have to laugh at this childish blaming of Senator Sanders...
George II
(67,782 posts)Response to George II (Reply #83)
Post removed
treestar
(82,383 posts)masses of Catholics and others are going to change their votes to Bernie just because of this!
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)the right thing.
vanlassie
(5,670 posts)hueymahl
(2,496 posts)And the fucking truth.
afertal
(148 posts)having principles!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)the lies told are all documented. Sanders has no shame.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Poor old Hillary.
Nobody likes her.
well, according to Obama, she's 'likable enough.'
frylock
(34,825 posts)Because from where I'm sitting, Hillary Supporter was wrong about every single aspect of this event.
Sanders WAS invited by the Vatican.
Sanders WAS able to fly there in time for the conference.
Sanders DID have a speaking slot.
Sanders DID meet with the Pope.
So, again, I ask you to please list the documented lies, and explain how this exploded in his face.
elljay
(1,178 posts)How dare you point out the inconvenient truth?
2naSalit
(86,612 posts)how the Pope described this meeting...
Keeping it honest and all.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)"Sanders WAS invited by the Vatican.
Sanders WAS able to fly there in time for the conference.
Sanders DID have a speaking slot.
Sanders DID meet with the Pope."
Which lies?
treestar
(82,383 posts)There can be no way to respond to a generalization that awesome and sweeping.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)and accurate.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)I'll agree with you there.
But Bernie's calculations seem to forget how anti-women's rights and anti-LGBT rights the Catholic Church - including Pope Francis - has been, even without including the cover-ups of sexual abuse.
I'm not sure how suspending his campaign in NY and running off to meet the Pope - the physical embodiment of the Catholic Church - is doing the "right thing."
The Pope is actually quite busy with doing the right thing about focusing on the humanitarian crisis in Europe right now - which Bernie has not even mentioned that I know of. But I would actually be much more impressed with the Pope if he used some of the Catholic Church's wealth to help alleviate this crisis, i.e., really walking the walk. I will not believe that this Pope, more open as he has been so far, is much different from those before him until he actually DOES something to change the longest-lived Establishment in the world.
Both Bernie and the Pope say a lot of nice things and things we all aspire to see changed. But after Bernie has been inside the Beltway for 25 years, he has not lifted a finger to change things nor has he worked to build relationships within Congress that he needs, although he certainly has talked a lot over those same 25 years, mostly tarring BOTH parties with the same brush, a la Raph Nader.
The difference between Nader and Bernie. Nader actually did accomplish MANY good things insofar as consumer rights are concerned. Until he enabled the election of W in 2000, I actually considered him a good guy. I used to consider that Bernie was too and gave him the benefit of the doubt in this election, although I have always been an HRC supporter.
But Bernie's words and actions and those of his campaign and surrogates in the last two weeks especially have changed my opinion of him completely.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Your post has so many errors that it earns a "F". Try again (but do your research first please!).
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)together with the facts to show where my errors are.
Until then, I will give your own response an "F."
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Is your clinging to your church 'n state hypocrisies! Look at what's happening in Europe and elsewhere! There's people in the streets EVERYWHERE and they're not bothering to check each other's faiths or affiliations! They just realize the "establishment", the status quo has got to go. Many are expressing themselves with eloquence and many are just saying "fuck this shit!" The Democratic party's thinking is "Over the Hill".
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)is the height of eloquence. It's short to the point and emphatic.
virgista
(48 posts)Bernie is one of the hardest working people in the Senate. His marathon 2010 filibuster for example:
"At 10:24 a.m. on Friday, Dec. 10, Sen. Sanders took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to lay out a clear argument against extending tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, against codifying a low inheritance tax rate which would impact only the richest 0.3 percent of households, and against a payroll tax holiday which would undercut funding for the Social Security trust fund. Without a break, the senator remained standing and on the Senate floor for 8 hours, 35 mins., and 14 secs."
You seem exceptionally bitter and angry about things. And also wrong in this instance.
Yes, I don't have thousands of texts on DU yet. I'm not doing alot of LOLs and K&Rs to get my count up.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)change things. But it is a LOT more words, I'll give you that.
Actual productivity is the best measure. I know a lot of people who used to spend more time at the office than I did. They loved to impress upon everyone how long their hours were. I got a lot more accomplished in the regular workday and this was noted by my supervisors. So I was promoted very quickly.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)If he had made as much effort at getting things done in Congress as he did in getting his handshake with the Pope, he'd have more to show for his 25 years in Congress besides getting a few post offices named and a noncontraversial Veterans bill that John McCain pushed through.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Really?
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)initiated the request for an invitation. The invitation was no spontaneous request from anyone. Strings had been pulled by Sachs & co.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)For years people here on DU have been calling out the pope, but it's only now that Sanders has met him that suddenly we have high profile support here. So no, I don't buy any Hillary supporter's sudden condemnation of Papal bigotry. You're trying desperately to make this into a negative and just managing to insult everyone in the process.
BTW, Nader had a minimal impact on the 2000 election, and more Democrats voted for Bush than they did for him.
However David Brock is responsible for Clarence Thomas being on the USSC.
No Brock = No Thomas.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)attention - likely from before you were ever even a gleam.
I am also a cradle Catholic, now recovering, and have eight solid years of training at Catholic schools behind me. Those were actually good years where part of the graduation requirement was to have several solid courses not only in theology, but also in philosophy. So yes, I know quite a lot specifically about the CC and also quite a lot about religion, philosophy and ethics generally. I wish that more did.
The Pope is the living representative on earth of the Catholic Church. This Pope has been much more sympathetic to the common people, even to making symbolically tangible gestures like the one he made yesterday of sponsoring refugees. But that does not change the history and present anti-woman and anti LGBT positions of the Church itself despite him.
Bernie went to a conference that was discussing an encyclical that was not even written by this Pope but by John Paul II, who was very much in the traditional pope mode and during whose tenure much sexual abuse was covered up. This is not something that should be overlooked. In fact, the Papacy as an institution has much to answer for, even though Pope Francis is at least making tiny steps in the right direction.
If you really think that my speaking out about the facts is somehow throwing this Pope under the bus or a Hillary supporter's "sudden condemnation of Papal bigotry," you certainly never have paid attention to any of my posts before or to the facts.
Where have YOU been?
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)no Biden = no Thomas. Brock did not control the confirmation voting; Biden did. Again, those pesky facts.
840high
(17,196 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)again
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)are the cynical Clinton supporters who have grown so accustomed to her dishonest, calculated manipulations and gross dishonesty--that they erroneously believe that every candidate is a craven user like her. Bernie is not like Hillary. Most politicians don't commoditize people and groups like Clinton does.
Bernie accepted an invitation. He attended and participated. And he met the Pope. Every single mocking post and talking point from the Peanut Gallery has been debunked and revealed as bullshit. Bernie did this because he was invited and the Vatican afforded him an opportunity to speak about issues that he's been championing for decades.
Your suggestion about him trying to win the Catholic vote with this, is more bullshit on top of the humongous pile of bullshit that your side has spewed for more than a week.
You would think that you guys would just quit while you're about ten miles into that deep hole you've dug for yourselves.
If you can't be kind and decent, the very least you could do is move to your next talking point.
You're embarrassing yourself.
treestar
(82,383 posts)look about the threads on Bernie and the Vatican and you can see many examples of how it is going to gain him votes and he'll even win NY.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)You guys have absolutely no credibility on this issue.
Every talking point that you made about Bernie and this trip--has been blown to smithereens.
No Bernie supporter ever, for one minute, thought that Bernie made this trip for political purposes or to win the Catholic vote.
We stand by him and the trip. It was an honor to be invited and to participate and to meet the Pope. Period.
You guys knew EVERYTHING didn't you? Such brilliant experts! You knew what the Pope was was thinking. What he had planned. You knew how the conference was structured and exactly how long Bernie would be talking (ten minutes before a coffee break! OMG!). You were just so sure that Bernie hadn't even been invited! You guys are the opposite of a think tank!
Now you have the audacity to start in with new talking points that are based on your brilliant predictions about how Catholics will vote in upcoming elections?
Please...go on!
elljay
(1,178 posts)that they will change their votes, not based on their views of candidates' policies, but simply because a candidate met with the Pope for 5 minutes? Is that REALLY what you're suggesting? How insulting!
Duval
(4,280 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)He never could stand her..
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe you ought to stick with telling gay people they "have enough rights already"? That seems more your speed.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But I do hope it gets some of them to start looking at what Bernie's message is. Whether he becomes President or not, he has the right message and we all need to be paying attention to it.
angrychair
(8,699 posts)I remember you treestar, I remember you
Your one of the people that recommended an OP using neo-Nazi , anti Semitic, holocaust denial hate sites and their crazy conspiracy theories about Sanders:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251941346
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Did you buy a white hood yet?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but this time it would be Dem vs Dem
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)I believe his administration was referred to as "Camelot"
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issues--for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers.
You got to admit Bernie sounds a lot like JFK did back in 1960
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)And he'd be the runaway winner but for the initial M$M blackout.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and there fore the Vatican would control the US - just campaign smears that obviously did not work but still I could see a variant of that happening here too
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)check reply #13
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and IRL I'm hearing this is the Vatican interfering in US politics from the other Democratic candidates side
jwirr
(39,215 posts)be able to see that this is the Pope doing something for the world problems. Before becoming the Pope he was a scientist - his concerns reflect two things - his understanding of science and his understanding of his faith. This conference is the outcome of that and NO attempt to control politics.
Also Bernie was invited because he and the people at this conference believe the same things. There was not a single corporatist invited. That is why Hillary was not invited. Her issues go in the opposite direction as this group. She cannot have it both ways.
NJCher
(35,673 posts)I'd forgotten how the pope was once a scientist. I think that's quite relevant.
I hope everyone can understand your post. It gets right to the heart of the matter.
Cher
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Yes, I know the history, as I assumed others did.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Ligyron
(7,632 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I had a feeling he probably met with the Pope in private. I don't know why people would be surprised considering Sanders views on wealth and inequality dovetail with the Pope's views about poverty and the worship of money. No doubt the Pope recognized a kindred spirit in Sanders on those issues and wanted to talk. I'm not a Catholic but I too have agreed with the Pope on these issues. You would have to be living under a rock to not have noticed that the Pope and Sanders are in agreement on these issues. Those that want to trash Sanders for this are very short-sighted in their criticism. Quite frankly it reveals a lot about them when they do.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)and now they are trying to smear the Pope
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)Kudos to his campaign staff and supporters out there too for avoiding promoting this sincere moment of unity with the mother church that was only for the sake of economic justice and not some pathetic attempt to garner the illusive "Catholic vote".
I'm also very impressed with the restraint all of the above have shown in making sure this story is flogged to death for at least two new cycles.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)The contrast is disgusting
Source: Guardian
Democrats marched against Democrats in San Francisco and revealed a widening rift between commuting tech workers and their venture capital bosses
After working in Silicon Valley for years, Morgan Quirk felt good protesting outside the home of a venture capitalist who funded tech startups and fundraisers for Hillary Clinton. He was part of a new splinter group of the liberal party: Democrats marching against Democrats in San Francisco, commuting tech workers against their bosses.
They sell you a dream at startups the ping-pong, the perks so they can pull 80 hours out of you, said Quirk, a 26-year-old software engineer. But in reality the venture capitalists control all the capital, all the labor, and all the decisions, so yeah, it feels great protesting one.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/16/hillary-clinton-protest-george-clooney-fundraiser-bernie-sanders
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Woe betide them!!
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)If this was a game of baseball, I'd say HRC and her supporters just lost this inning of the game.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)She can't help it
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)She's a narcissist and believes that she is superior to everyone, including the head of the RCC.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)No one forced them to support the most corrupt political candidate in the 2016 race and it's still not too late to reject the dark and go into the light.
I feel certain that the Vatican could even provide a couple of Exorcists to chase the demon out of their souls.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)sus453
(164 posts)That was quite the talking point for Hillary supporters before today.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)has now added it's typical anti-Bernie spin to this piece and removed some information that appeared in the earlier piece. I'm glad I got to read it before the editors got their hands on it to spin it.
Found the original version here. They evidently picked up the story before the WaPo changed it.
http://trueviralnews.com/bernie-sanders-meets-privately-with-pope-francis/
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Every thing they do is right out if KKKarl Rove's Play Book
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)judging by the craziness here.
Fortunately I found the original piece because it was picked up by another publication before the changes were made.
http://trueviralnews.com/bernie-sanders-meets-privately-with-pope-francis/
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Birds of a Feather and all ..
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)Blessed be.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)picture in his campaign literature, I may begin to believe that he means what he said.
Until that, I will consider this whole episode shameful pandering from beginning to end and contrary to acceptable diplomatic protocol. It has reinforced my initial belief that Bernie literally has no concept of how to behave on the global level.
It's the same thing that we see in this primary campaign when Bernie and his supporters - some of whom actually HATE the Dem party - rail against the rules of the Democratic party which have been in place for many elections cycles now. There seems to be a perception that Bernie does not have to abide by the rules and protocol that the rest of us observe.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I think you're bullshitting.
revbones
(3,660 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Realize - using RATpubliCON Smear tactics won't get her votes come the GE
George II
(67,782 posts)"When I was leaving (Casa Santa Marta) Senator Sanders was there, he came to the meeting on Centesimus Annus, and he knew that I was leaving at that time, and he had the courtesy to greet me," Pope Francis said. "I greeted him and his wife and another couple that was with him."
"So when I went down, I said hello, a shake of the hand and nothing more," he continued. "This is politeness. This is called good manners"
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Honestly - how does Hillary supporters expect anyone to vote for a candidate that stoops so low
MBS
(9,688 posts)where all the conference attendees stayed, and also where Pope Francis stays (he eschewed the ultra-fancy papal apartments and has chosen this guest house as his residence instead).
George II
(67,782 posts)...that's where Sanders encountered him at 4AM.
Francis said he greeted Sanders on Saturday morning as he was leaving the Santa Marta, the hotel within Vatican grounds where the pope lives.
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2016/04/16/pope-francis-calls-sanders-greeting-only-common-courtesy/
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...on a truly official visit.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)He lives in a suite in the same building used by attendees at the conference. As he says in the video, Sanders knew he would show up at 6 a.m. and was waiting for him.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)come this way and I can shake his hand!"
"OK, Lucy!"
"Don't tell Ricky!"
George II
(67,782 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...the movie theater and the two guys started bothering him, asking for an autograph.
shanti
(21,675 posts)that if it had been hillary invited to the vatican, she would NEVER have said what bernie said. he didn't have to say it wasn't an endorsement, but it's just another example of his total honesty.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Syria, Honduras ....
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)from the Pope, especially during a primary election campaign.
She knows and understands diplomatic protocol as well as the very awkward position this whole episode put the Pope in.
Bernie's actions in this situation demonstrate more than anything else that he neither knows diplomatic protocol nor cares about it. That is NOT a great quality for any President of a powerful country whose smallest actions can impact the globe. If anything, it's a huge red flag.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)to a conference on Economic Morality
Mary Mac
(323 posts)maybe a little Gregorian chant?|
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And the Bots, Elites, Established, Bankster lovers, etc. can lie all they want...
Bernie was at the conference...and he had a short meet with the Pope.
Period.
Move onto anothe lie Bots.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)If that's what Bernie is claiming..........
Oh.....
NEVERMIND...
Duval
(4,280 posts)But "some" need more clarification, so thanks for posting, FreakinDJ!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... that's misleading.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... the Pope's take on this in the video? Response #132.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Jane, Sachs, Sach's wife and Sorondo were there also, so it wasn't exactly "private".
http://m.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/pope-francis-meets-bernie-sanders-vatican-confirms/#ixzz463soed1s
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Francis may SAY he was being non political but his actions speak otherwise.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)Pope Francis didn't attend "a private meeting."
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)flying rabbit
(4,634 posts)Either way, whether Bernie exchanged bro hugs, or just bumped into the Pope.