Elizbaeth Warren slams Trump after ‘woman card’ comment
Source: The Boston Globe
Senator Elizabeth Warren says Donald Trumps latest critique of Hillary Clinton shows his weakness not to mention his sexism.
Donald Trump clearly feels threatened by Secretary Clintons qualifications to be president so hes attacking Hillary Clinton for being a woman, Warren said in a telephone interview with the Globe. Thats what weak men do. It is an old story, and I dont think the American voters will fall for it.
* * *
Warren also posed a question of her own: I hoped you were going to ask me if I thought he was a sexist, Warren said.
Thats like asking if he has bad hair, she said. He wears the sexism out front for everyone to see.
Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/elizbaeth-warren-slams-trump-after-%e2%80%98woman-card%e2%80%99-comment/ar-BBsowVI?ocid=iehp
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
LovingA2andMI This message was self-deleted by its author.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)TWO women on a ticket!!! Gosh!.
https://goddesskerrilyn.wordpress.com/2016/03/15/the-racist-roots-of-bernies-sexist-tree/
Well - there is some precedent for a single gender ticket I suppose.
sheshe2
(83,789 posts)Brilliant take down.
Thats like asking if he has bad hair, she said. He wears the sexism out front for everyone to see.
BOOM!
Phentex
(16,334 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Will hopefully be one of Hillary Clinton's surrogates should things continue on the path it appears to be heading, and that's with Hillary Clinton securing the Dem nominee for President.
That would be fabulous, because she'd be one hell of a surrogate for Hillary Clinton--she's already one of the best/brightest surrogates for the Democratic Party around. I really admire Elizabeth Warren, and she's not afraid to "give it right back" to the GOP. Love that about her. She doesn't back down from from a bully or from a very weak man like Donald Trump, and Elizabeth Warren is 100% correct, Trump is a very weak coward and bully of a "man," and I use the term man extremely loosely.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Response to olddad56 (Reply #4)
sheshe2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Was insulting towards Hillary Clinton and towards women in general again. Mocking Hillary Clinton's accomplishments and qualifications to be president, and I've always found Elizabeth Warren to be the kind of person to say what she means and means what she says and she meant to tell Trump what she thought of him for dissing Hillary Clinton's accomplishments and for dissing women in general.
Donald Trump clearly feels threatened by Secretary Clintons qualifications to be president so hes attacking Hillary Clinton for being a woman, Warren said in a telephone interview with the Globe. Thats what weak men do. It is an old story, and I dont think the American voters will fall for it.
And to boot, Elizabeth Warren said Trump was weak and feeling very THREATENED because of Hillary Clinton's qualifications to be president. Elizabeth Warren came to Hillary Clinton's defense, so she clearly feels comfortable in doing so. I say again, that would love for Elizabeth Warren to be a surrogate for Hillary Clinton if possible.
Pastiche423
(15,406 posts)Calling Elizabeth a surrogate for Hillary is insulting not only to Elizabeth Warren but to all liberal women.
Chico Man
(3,001 posts)Who claims to speak for "all liberal women" (except those that support Hillary, of course).
hack89
(39,171 posts)she's a good Dem that wants to see a Dem in the White House.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Elizabeth Warren, especially if someone as horrible as Donald Trump is who can name the Scalia-type justices to the high court he said he'd love to appoint. A court stacked that far to the right will produce disastrous rulings for the next 25-30 years or even more. Elizabeth Warren KNOWS this, and hopefully will continue being a surrogate for Hillary Clinton, Dems etc. She obviously doesn't have a problem doing it, or she wouldn't be doing it.
Trump isn't just insulting Hillary Clinton, but people's daughters, sisters, Aunts, so's etc.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)understands just what is at stake in this election.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)That's what a political surrogate does.
http://www.wisegeek.com/in-politics-what-is-a-campaign-surrogate.htm#didyouknowout
A campaign surrogate is a term used to describe a person who acts on the behalf of a candidate running for some sort of political office. The campaign surrogate often appears at public events that the candidate cannot make it to, or may simply appear to bolster the image of the candidate in a certain demographic.
No insult to Warren at this point in the process. Just more Hillary bashing here for a really nit-picking reason. BTW, I voted for Bernie in our PA primary, but it looks like Hillary will be the nominee. I don't see how some of the trashing she's been getting on D.U. is of any benefit in stopping Trump ( I can't even think of Cruz). Vote Green if you don't like Hillary. I've voted my idealism for president several times in the past (but not for Nader). The older I get, the more I resent the "lesser of evils" thing, but the more I realize I don't want to throw my vote away. There are far worse choices than Hillary. Saying there was no real difference between Bush and Gore in 2000 got us eight disastrous years of Dubya and Cheney. Iraq alone disproved that argument. I have always thought that we need to do away with the electoral college, for a start.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)May she be the senior senator from MA for some time to come.
greymouse
(872 posts)Okay for Hillary to play it, but not okay for someone to call her on it.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)It's Donald Trump who continues to insult and marginalize women and whose attempting to control a woman's reproductive rights IE: Recently saying, as I'm sure you know, that women should go to jail if they sought an abortion if abortion was overturned. Then when he was heavily criticized for saying that, he then said it should be doctors who should go to jail if they performed abortions.
Any way you look at it, Donald Trump is the one playing the woman card, and trying to use it against Hillary Clinton and other women in a negative way, and I'm happy that Elizabeth Warren called him on it.
houston16revival
(953 posts)greymouse
(872 posts)That's why I support Bernie, and not a Goldwater Girl who loves war and Wall Street money and supports trashing the environment with fracking.
houston16revival
(953 posts)he has no party to control at this point, no leverage, no touchstone with Congress
That's why he's a movement progressive
It will look a lot different in 4 years
I'm a Democrat, though, I support my party
Sometimes with, sometimes without, enthusiasm
That's because we're powerless if Trump gets in office
20% of a whole loaf is better than no loaf
To me anyway
greymouse
(872 posts)we'll be getting less and less of the loaf as the party moves further to the right.
I thought Nader was a disaster, not fit to be President and not enough support to win. But Bernie is different. Qualified and with massive support, which only grows as more people get to know him.
I support Democratic principles. The Democratic party has just about abandoned those principles and is pretty much totally corrupt at the national level. So I vote on the basis of candidates, not labels. That's why I'm #BernieorBust
By the way, if Bernie is a loser, what do you call a woman who ruined the lives of millions of civilians in Libya and Iraq.
houston16revival
(953 posts)to call her President-elect
because the alternative will destroy our environment, national parks, world reputation, jobs, Social Security, Health care
and I know with Mrs. Clinton we'll be able to save some if not most of that in at least skeletal form, maybe more with a
Democratic Congress.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)Demagoguery is an unattractive trait.
And you are old enough to be wiser than that.
Losing is hard - ask Hillary on that one.
But the true measure of a person and a campaign is how they pick themselves up.
There's work to be done if we want victory in November.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)...bar the death throes
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)he'd face as much obstructionism as President Obama. It goes without saying that the Repugs will fight to the death to thwart any Democrat OR woman president, and they despise the Clintons. Another four to eight years of continuing obstruction, however, ( and with the electorate growing younger), should pretty well finish off the GOP.
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)Look - Losing a hard-fought political campaign is hard. Ask Hillary on that one.
But the real measure is how you pick yourself up and what you do next.
If you've been voting for sixty years as you claim you are in your 80's. You've seen a lot of elections. This may be the most critical of all of them.
Time to stop tearing Hillary down. She is the only qualified adult in the race.
Then - on to VICTORY in November.
It's gonna be a wild ride and the Democrats will need all the help they can get against a desperate and relentless and super-funded #GOP.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)Trump's dismissive and demeaning sexism, not the cause of it. Thanks, though, for reminding me to order one of those cards so the probable Democratic nominee can "deal me in" for the rest of the campaign from now through the November election.
houston16revival
(953 posts)might be right in a Clinton-Warren ticket's wheelhouse
Double the pleasure, double the fun
JoFerret
(10,704 posts)for a single gender ticket.
But she maybe more useful in the Senate. So let's get cracking on winning all the down-ticket races.
We need a filibuster-proof Congress.