Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gungnir

(242 posts)
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:48 PM May 2016

Migrant crisis: EU plans penalties for refusing asylum seekers [$290,000/person]

Source: BBC

The European Commission has proposed reforms to EU asylum rules that would see stiff financial penalties imposed on countries refusing to take their share of asylum seekers.

The bloc's executive body is planning a sanction of €250,000 (£200,000; $290,000) per person.

The Commission wants changes made to an asylum system which has buckled amid an influx of migrants.

The plans would require support from most member states as well as MEPs.



Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36202490



That is equivalent to 66yrs wages for the average Syrian (based on the ILO stat of $364avg monthly wage).
Hmmmm, could there be a cheaper way? Or should we just threaten them to send us $290,000 for each of our unemployed or we will send them there?
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Democat

(11,617 posts)
1. This could encourage some countries to turn more against the EU
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:30 PM
May 2016

Neither voters not politicians in some countries will appreciate the idea.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
2. Looks to me like the EU is trying to commit suicide.
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:24 AM
May 2016

That will go over well with the ordinary people.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
7. It's mostly the RW governments and political parties in Europe that are resisting sharing in refugee
Thu May 5, 2016, 05:53 AM
May 2016

resettlement. It is mostly conservatives that resist refugee resettlement in the US as well.

Antipathy towards the EU is a common sentiment on the right in Europe. The refugee crisis has given the an Islamic OTHER to use as an example of why the EU is evil.

The EU probably would be better off to let (or force) the RW governments in eastern and central Europe to leave. (Kind of like liberal Americans taking Texas conservatives up on their threat to their state secede from our country. ) The relatively liberal and prosperous core countries in northern Europe would be better off without the conservative-led countries that have joined later. I don't think that liberal European think that way so they won't jettison and wall off the relatively poor countries in central and eastern Europe but will continue to try to work with them.

400 arrested as left wing protesters clash with far-right in Germany

Hundreds of left-wing protesters have clashed with people attending a far-right party conference in the German city of Stuttgart.

AfD, which wants to ban the burqa and outlaw minarets in Germany, is expected to announce that it is explicitly anti-Islamic during the meeting.

The party was due to set out its manifesto ahead of country's general election next year.

Footage on social media showed the protesters shouting slogans such as: "Keep refugees, drive Nazis away!"

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/alternative-fur-deutschland-conference-protesters-germany-arrested-a7007971.html

Gungnir

(242 posts)
12. Al Jeezera: Refugee crisis: Where are the Gulf countries?
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:49 AM
May 2016
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2015/09/refugee-crisis-gulf-countries-150905085458691.html

Washington Post
The Arab world’s wealthiest nations are doing next to nothing for Syria’s refugees
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/04/the-arab-worlds-wealthiest-nations-are-doing-next-to-nothing-for-syrias-refugees/

BBC
Migrant crisis: Why the Gulf states are not letting Syrians in

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34173139

BBC
Migrant crisis: Why Syrians do not flee to Gulf states

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34132308

NPR
Gulf States Fend Off Criticism About Doing Little For Syrian Refugees

http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/09/20/441457924/gulf-states-fend-off-criticism-about-doing-little-for-syrian-refugees

The Atlantic
Migrant Crisis: Where Have the Gulf States Been?

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/09/refugees-migrant-crisis-arab-countries/404203/

HuffPo
No, Arab Gulf Countries Are Not Taking in Refugees

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chaker-khazaal/no-arab-gulf-countries-ar_b_8280448.html

USA Today:
Why the Arab States won’t take in Syrian refugees: Column
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/10/04/why-arab-states-wont-take-syrian-refugees-column/72747230/

Time:
Why Some Arabs States Refuse to Accept Syrian Refugee
s
http://time.com/4025187/arab-states-syrian-refugees/

CNN:
Refugee crisis: Why aren't Gulf states taking them in?

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/08/world/gulf-states-syrian-refugee-crisis/

Sydney Morning Herald
Refugee crisis: why aren't the rich Gulf Arab states doing more?

http://www.smh.com.au/world/migrant-crisis-why-arent-the-rich-gulf-arab-states-doing-more-20150909-gjj1hn.html#ixzz47nSZ63ys



pampango

(24,692 posts)
13. Good point. It is right wing governments in Europe and the Gulf that are resisting sharing
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:24 PM
May 2016

in resettling the refugees.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
8. You've misunderstood - the €250k is a penalty, internal to the EU
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:25 AM
May 2016

to punish countries that refuse to help share the burden of other members. It's not an estimate of how much it costs to take a refugee.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
9. And there is no way it's going to be paid.
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:12 AM
May 2016

Poland and Hungary have already said they will refuse to pay the fine.

Gungnir

(242 posts)
10. Cost to take refugee: min of $86,000/year; $290,000 would cover 3.4yrs of a refugee stay best case
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016
http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/04/09/europe-how-pay-for-refugees/

...
Most of the building blocks for an effective asylum system are available; they only need to be assembled into a comprehensive and coherent policy. Critically, refugees and the countries that contain them in the Middle East must receive enough financial support to make their lives there viable, allowing them to work and to send their children to school. That would help to keep the inflow of refugees to a level that Europe can absorb. This can be accomplished by establishing a firm and reliable target for the number of refugee arrivals: between 300,000 and 500,000 per year. This number is large enough to give refugees the assurance that many of them can eventually seek refuge in Europe, yet small enough to be accommodated by European governments even in the current unfavorable political climate.
...
At least €30 billion ($34 billion) a year will be needed for the EU to carry out such a comprehensive plan. This includes providing Turkey and other “frontline” countries with adequate funding to maintain their very large refugee populations, creating a common EU asylum agency and security force for the EU’s external borders, addressing the humanitarian chaos in Greece, and establishing common standards across the Union for receiving and integrating refugees.
...


At maximum number of refugees:
$43,000,000,000/500,000Refugees/yr = $86,000/yr/refugee (Best case)

At minimum number of refugees:
$34,000,000,000/300,000refugees/yr = $143,333/yr/refugee


I think if we gave each refugee family of 4 a one time payment of $573,332 they would able stabilize their country. And it would still be a lot cheaper than the best case of $344,000/ yr/ family of 4 that it will require to keep them outside of their country.


Then maybe we should do the same for each American...

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
11. No, you've misunderstood again
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:43 AM
May 2016

Right after what you put in bold, there's:

" This includes providing Turkey and other “frontline” countries with adequate funding to maintain their very large refugee populations, creating a common EU asylum agency and security force for the EU’s external borders, addressing the humanitarian chaos in Greece, and establishing common standards across the Union for receiving and integrating refugees. "

It's always worth reading the whole paragraph before you start the arithmetic. The cost Soros estimated is for far more than just the living costs for the refugees that EU countries would take.

"I think if we gave each refugee family of 4 a one time payment of $573,332 they would able stabilize their country. "

No, that's not how wars work. You can't just put money in private individuals' hands, tell them to stay put, and expect them to become invulnerable to bombs. You can sometimes bribe the fighters to stop.

Gungnir

(242 posts)
15. Analogy: cost of college; cost of college is far more than just tuition...
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:58 PM
May 2016

and the other cost are distributed around to housing, food, etc. But the total cost is still per student that I have to pay.

Or am I not understanding it correctly?


Enjoying the conversation, will have to pick up later tonight

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
16. No, you're still not understanding it correctly
Thu May 5, 2016, 01:19 PM
May 2016

Soros was talking about the cost including supporting the refugees in Turkey and other 'frontline' countries (Lebanon, Jordan), of whom there are several million.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Migrant crisis: EU plans ...