Clinton: I Expect Sanders To Call For Unity After Tuesday
Source: Politico.com 06/05/16 10:44 EDT
Bernie Sanders should end his campaign and begin convincing supporters to line up behind Hillary Clinton as the presumptive Democratic nominee, Clinton said in an interview that aired Sunday on CNNs State of the Union.
Clinton said that in 2008, some supporters urged her to battle Barack Obama to the convention but noted that she decided to cede to Obama rather than fight because they shared similar policy goals and values. When this years primary season largely ends Tuesday, she said, I expect Senator Sanders to do the same.
In a separate interview on ABCs This Week, Clinton added, I think given where we are in this race, that I will have not only more than a three million vote margin, but I will have a significant majority of pledged delegates by the close of voting on Tuesday.
Sanders, though, has given no indication he intends to clear Clintons path this week. He told CNN in a corresponding interview that the world could change dramatically before the Democratic National Convention.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/06/clinton-sanders-democrats-california-convention-223916
merrily
(45,251 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)If she can't win against Trump unless he drops out now, the Party has much bigger problems than his going until the convention nominate someone.
Some people are having a collective tantrum and calling it important to the country. Not buying it.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)attacks her and claims that she isn't the legitimate nominee, that could be quite damaging.
merrily
(45,251 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Bernie should stay in the race.
This is not 2008. Obama had no FBI investigation, no foundation that might suggest conflicts of interest, and no crazy former Secret Service agent writing sensationalist books about him. This is 2016. Bernie should stay in the race until after the convention at the very least.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If he is, I won't support it, but he isn't. He has no more fracks to give, except about anti-fracking.
Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)For eight years from now. He's old dude.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sorry, ageism just backfires on a Hillary supporter every time.
Just yell "sexism." That one works well, most especially on female Bernie supporters.
Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)Clinton will be too old eight years from now as well.
I wouldn't vote for the sweet baby jEzUz if he were an octogenarian.
But feel free to support Sanders in 2024 if you wish.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You replied to it at least 20 minutes ago, so I can where you'd forget.
Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)you have no reply.
To be honest I wouldn't vote for jezuz no matter how old he is.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Not a good sign. An even worse sign? Still not getting it after it's been pointed out to you.
Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)Good for you. Maybe you mommy will let you go to triangle next.
Your talking point was corrupt bargain. A recurring theme amongst people who have no facts. It probably predates the republic. Certainly it was used against Washington.
So how did this bargain work? Did Clinton throw the election to Obama so that she could win again in 2016?
merrily you got a lot of splaining to do.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Buzz cook
(2,472 posts)You make a claim and won't defend it.
You are the reason Bernie couldn't win.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)She had some brain thing, didn't she? And she resigned as SoS due to health, citing exhaustion. How the hell is she planning on handling 8 years of the presidency?
Of course there's talk that Obama pushed her out. Not that that's any better.
.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The rumor could be part of whatever deal they made, though.
In medicine, think horsies, not zebras. In politics, set your imagination free. It'll probably still never be as diabolical as the reality. That's likely why the CIA weaponized the term "conspiracy theory."
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)among a host of other similar, ones...one can Google it and find out the details.
Also, I think that is a part of why she was not out vigorously campaigning like Bernie...who appears to be healthy as a horse. Listening tours and focus groups are not really campaigning.
Then California came into play.
Response to libdem4life (Reply #141)
Post removed
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)posts seem to have missed the cerebral cortex befory engaging. But, it's all good.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts).
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)She seems fine now.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Bernie's age was brought up by a Hillary supporter and I addressed it further down the thread.
Let's keep things in perspective, shall we?
.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)How many times have I heard "the charges are coming any day now", "wait until next week, its going to be big", "the indictment is around the corner". I believed it once but I have moved on from this bullshit. Sanders and his politically suicidal fans have lost all credibility. I wanted to believe he was different but he is just another egotistical politician that wants everything despite never earning it. I voted for Sanders when the caucuses came to my state. I waited in line for hours to cast my vote for the guy. It was a massive mistake. I'm not voting for this guy if he somehow steals the nomination or for any other reason. I can't stand listening to him for one more second. Sanders is everything that is wrong with politics. He's a demagogue that claims to be above the fray but really he is driven by ego and his own glory. He is willing to let this country burn if he can't have his way. Fuck that and I don't want to be part of any group that believes any of his bullshit.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I missed this. What is this all about?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Not very well written in my opinion.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)wallyworld2
(375 posts)The legitimate nominee is elected at the Democratic National Presidential Convention that will be held in July.
Until then Senator Sanders will be campaigning on his platform and the differences between his and Hillary's
That's not attacking
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)He's still smearing her though.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)which is rather difficult, being they shapeshift with the current political climate.
Truman said, "I don't give people hell, I just tell them the truth and they think they're in hell." That's what I've observed in this situation, as well.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)critical that it be discussed in this campaign for the presidency. It is only a smear if Hillary can prove her record is untrue which she has not done.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)is smearing.
Too bad you picked a candidate that you can't stand to hear facts about.
.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)wallyworld2
(375 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)They seem to be pretty freaked out by someone actually challenging the 'assumed' winner by following allowable rules.
I think it's because they are tired of being scared that he might actually win.
I can understand that.
But I donated because he stayed in until every state voted.
wallyworld2
(375 posts)She doesn't get to make up the rules as she goes along.
Democracy doesn't work that way.
merrily
(45,251 posts)We're not a democracy and never have been. Supposedly, when we finally got universal suffrage (well, semi-universal. We still outlaw voting by felons, for example) not quite a century ago we finally become the "democracy within a Republic" that we were supposedly set up to be in that we all get to vote for people who actually do strive to represent all our best interests. How's all that been working for the past century?
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Many on DU seem to have that goal, to do all the damage they can to Clinton and the party. I think their main goal is to have NO Democrat in the WH.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Sort of a morbid version of "if i can't win, i'm taking my ball and going home"
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and if Bernie wins they are voting for him. I mean, that's 13 million voters, right, added to Bernie's ten million and however many more are won by the end of the primaries.
That means no way Trump can win, so why the fear...there is no threat of burning the house down.
merrily
(45,251 posts)So, if a Democratic victory in November is really your goal.....
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Not because of blackmail.
merrily
(45,251 posts)RKP5637
(67,111 posts)more unhappy and literally frightened than if HRC were in the WH. I still think many just do not seriously recognize what the future will hold with a Trump presidency. I like Bernie, I voted for him, but I'm not reckless enough to not do my part to stop a Trump presidency. If the nominee is HRC, then so be it, I will vote for HRC.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)We just want him to end the race when it's really over, not when Hillary decides it's over.
merrily
(45,251 posts)thought there was no chance in hell either Sanders or Warren would run, especially Sanders, and it still is.
So it all depends on a voter's perspective and I think people who help Hillary be the nominee are the reckless ones. Please also see Replies 7 and 48.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)constantly nagging feeling she could lose to Trump. The citizenry is fed up with establishments, right or wrong. Yet TPTB of the dem party are pushing forward an establishment candidate, and one with loads of baggage.
2016 is going to be very very close IMO, incredibly close. I think Bernie could easily defeat Trump. With HRC, I'm concerned. No matter how much people throw at Trump it rolls off of him with his supporters.
The dem party is in a rut, and that rut seems to deepen with HRC. Trump, has captured the anger and frustration in the US, and directed it toward support for him. Those are very powerful emotions and truth about a candidate is often blinded, for example, Teflon Don. And now the R party bosses are cosying up to him.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Republicans to imagine a worse candidate than Trump. Either that, or their talking heads are trying to fool us.
David Brooks has said repeatedly that he never thought it possible that Trump would get the nom. How someone gets and keeps a job as a well paid political columnist and author after an admission like that is beyond me. So, is he unfit for his job, but gets to keep it anyway, or is he lying and Trump was the plan all along? Who knows? So much kabuki and acting, I cannot tell anymore. I can only do what I think is right.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)1. Clinton is already damaged and we all know it. Supporters deny it and all we're doing is reminding people.
2. The same applies to the party.
Nearly all of us are life long democrats whether people on DU want to believe it or not. It's inconsequential whether you do or don't. But we're wildly disappointed in the direction the party has gone since it's been co opted by the corporate conservatives. We can't damage a party that's already damaged. Once a car is totaled, it can't become more totaled. All we're doing is uniting the people that remember what it meant to be a democrat and not some cheerleader right or wrong.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Charge of the Light Brigade...right. The Peasantry referred to is the global reputation of the US...Warmonger Empire. The tower will read...Boeing, et al.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)Election fraud should be monitored by both candidates. It is a crime and you can mock and hand ring all that you want. Sanders people are not going to take this sitting down. Laugh your rear end off when they stand their ground and don't take up the slack to select her. There is absolutely no reason to support someone who does not support the process.
HeartoftheMidwest
(309 posts)..I love you.
peace13
(11,076 posts)wallyworld2
(375 posts)is not dragging anything out.
but complaining and whining that her opponent won't drop out will only make her look like another Donald chump
that's her problem
And that problem would go away if she stopped demanding Senator Sanders drop out and debated him for the legitimate candidate he is.
Whether or not this damages people or the DNC is totally up to Clinton.
A contested convention could just as easily serve to excite and invigorate the electorate. It is all in how it is approached.
If Clinton and Co. cannot figure out a way to turn a contested convention into a positive, then how are they ever going to be able to turn around a domestic or international event that does not go the way they planned?
If the Clintons cannot find a way to use the energy of a contested convention to build momentum, they they do not deserve to live in the White House again.
ancianita
(36,095 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)everything.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)She does not know what her campaign has wrought.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)"The threat of riots" is a jerky talking-point, pushed by the MSM and Hillary camp.
It is purposefully dishonest. It is very easy to throw BS grenades like this.
You know Sanders never "threatened riots". The word he used was "messy", and he even
explained what he meant ad nauseum (because this was purposefully distorted and beaten
into the ground, forcing him to defend himself) The race between him and Clinton is closer
than Clinton wants to admit. This means the convention will not be the beauty pageant
and coronation ceremony you would like it to be, but more of a "hashing out of the issues"
conventions are intended to be.
I expect that Hillary Clinton will get the delegates needed -- after Tuesday. Unless you feel
the opinions of voters in California, et al, don't matter.
She will win the primary, mostly because she has more superdelagates.
I expect that Sanders won't be the turd in the punch bowl he's painted to be, and he will
end up backing her in the general election per the usual protocol in these primary battles.
But, if Hillary manages to lose in November, Sanders has already been set up as the convenient
scapegoat.
Please remember: Obama managed to win in 2008, even though Hillary herself refused to drop
out of the race until the bitter end, and he beat a much more viable candidate.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)3,000,000 more votes and a solid majority of the Delegates.
thanks
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)If he refuses to acknowledge that Clinton has beat him, he will be made irrelevant until he concedes to Clinton. The news will be all about the general election. The country is moving on and Bernie will be left behind wearing the sandwich board of shame that reads "Sore Loser."
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)to see Bern end this race looking some much like an Ass.......It's clear now why almost none of his cohorts endorsed him.!
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)They fear being disconnected from the Gravy Train!
RichVRichV
(885 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Flatpicker
(894 posts)"they shared similar policy goals and values."
They really don't this time.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Bernie values --- no New World Order.
economic fairness for all classes.
Bernie values war voted for plenty of it
But youll willfully ignore that
As usual
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)voter do.
What he does not support...and I know this does not fit your perfect dyad of yes/no...
1) To attempt all conflicts with diplimatic solutions FIRST. War as Last Resort.
2) To seek input from allies.
3) To support the troops and do all possible in a Hawkish Empire to stay relevent...even when shameful ammendments (not his) are attached (legislative bribery) to US funding bills.
You need to get more than a one sentence understanding of a very complex issue. Really.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)"1) To attempt all conflicts with diplimatic solutions FIRST. War as Last Resort."
Interesting, That's precisely what Clinton stated in her 2002 Iraq Resolution speech yet she is a labeled a war hawk and Bernie gets a free pass.
"2) To seek input from allies..."
Clinton also wanted input from allies ... we had the UK , Australia, Spain and Poland
"3) To support the troops and do all possible in a Hawkish Empire to stay relevent...even when shameful ammendments (not his) are attached (legislative bribery) to US funding bills. "
Yes Clinton also voted to support troops. That's why she voted to fund them when the Bush admin. threatened to leaves them out with no supplies and blame Dems.
"You need to get more than a one sentence understanding of a very complex issue. Really."
Says the person who just made it painfully obvious they have no understanding of the complex issue.
So now
what was the difference between voting to oust Saddam in 1998 as opposed to 2003? Because ol Bernard was all for it then.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)jmowreader
(50,560 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)"Well, thats -- well, the answer is yes and no," Sanders responded. "Yes, we do agree on a number of issues, and by the way, on her worst day, Hillary Clinton will be an infinitely better candidate and President than the Republican candidate on his best day."
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)1) Vote for and support one of the worst foreign policy blunders in American history, a war based on lies that took the lives of thousands of people.
2) Deny for years and years and years that it was a mistake to vote for said war.
3) Become the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.
And for some reason I can't even begin to grasp, a lot of people are happy about this.
McKim
(2,412 posts)The Lancet put the body count for the Iraq War at one million and counting.
liberal from boston
(856 posts)I will not vote for Hillary due to her aggressive hawkish Foreign Policy:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hillary-clinton-and-the-s_b_9231190.html
Skittles
(153,169 posts)please stop with the "her time" bullshit
How fitting!
Zorro
(15,740 posts)Time for Sanders to acknowledge the inevitable and work together against the Republicans -- if he meant what he said about preventing a Trump presidency.
dchill
(38,505 posts)Indictable. Impeachable. Take your pick. They both work well with "inevitable."
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That's why he is staying in the race to the end.
Pastiche423
(15,406 posts)Keep on expecting, cause it ain't gonna happen.
840high
(17,196 posts)never get my vote.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Behind Bernie Sanders.
reddread
(6,896 posts)its getting pretty close to the end of the game, anyone counting on winning with a bluff
will be sweating heavily for a while.
isnt it too bad they cannot offer anything to induce support from liberal Democrats?
can not. will not. simply wont.
thats a really nice one way street you have there.
LonePirate
(13,426 posts)For them, it's never been about what Bernie believes in or has to say.
Then again, many of them are not Democrats so they will return to their Libertarian loving ways any day now.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Bernie even declared himself a candidate.
Had enough of perpetual war, having to pick the lesser of two evils, etc. Take your pick, for me it was all of the above and Bernie had nothing to do with it.
What it really boils down to is that I'm done voting against someone, I will now only vote for someone that I consider worthy of my vote.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)Not gonna happen. Even if it did millions of Sanders supporters would say Frak that.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Welcome to DU. Sorry for the mess around here tonight.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Forget about it.
Skink
(10,122 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Comprehend? Add "Contested" to the list of words. There ya have it. Pretty simple.
McKim
(2,412 posts)The tone of Hillary's comments on her expectations sounds like she is talking down to an unruly child. This is a power grab to shut down
Sanders, his supporters and his ideas for the platform. Sounds a lot like "bring them to heel".
840high
(17,196 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)What else should she be, grateful? gracious? humble? uniting?
Zambero
(8,964 posts)"Wouldn't It Be Nice"
Maybe if we wish and think and hope and pray it might come true...
Maybe then there wouldn't be a single thing that we can't do...
moonbeam23
(312 posts)ain't gonna happen
hurple
(1,306 posts)Until I met his supporters.
And visiting here reminds me of that, every time.
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)But the big old Bernie meanies made me like totally barf so I'm voting for someone else. Nanernaner to you!
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Databuser
(58 posts)Go Bernie!
Gene Debs
(582 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)- sh#t in one hand and 'expect' in the other, and see which one fills up first.
http://www.smobserved.com/story/2016/06/05/news/fbi-hillary-clinton-to-face-criminal-indictment-for-email-abuse-very-soon/1334.html
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I'm so sorry we have to deal with what is in the one hand...because I fear it is already full and overflowing. It is a new saying I haven't heard. I can think of a lot of uses for it. Thanks.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Steviehh
(115 posts)Having a hard time w/ vote counts. And chasing off potential democratic voters.
BIG mistake, Hillary.
Then Kissinger raised his ugly head and I can't vote for Hillary.
KISSINGER is consulting w/ H and O? No wonder drones are still killing civilians.
Sick of war!
ThinkCritically
(241 posts)some supporters urged her to battle Barack Obama to the convention but noted that she decided to cede to Obama rather than fight because they shared similar policy goals and values."
Her policy goals and values are much different than Bernies.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)The celebration, however, has rankled the Clinton campaign and the candidate herself. They see it as a highhanded effort to embarrass her and to generate renewed calls from others in the party for her to quit the race before anyone has achieved a genuine majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates.
In a signal of how fragile the detente between the two sides is, the Clinton campaign sent out a tart memo yesterday under the name of communications director Howard Wolfson calling the Obama rally in Iowa a slap in the face of millions of voters in the remaining primary states and to Senator Clintons 17 million supporters. Then, in language tying the Obama campaign to the Bush White House, the memo continues: Premature victory laps and false declarations of victory are unwarranted. Declaring mission accomplished does not make it so.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/the-end-of-hillary-clinto_b_9791460.html
Seems the winds have changed for her again.
PSPS
(13,603 posts)Kall
(615 posts)that the Clinton campaign just flat-out spreads lies like that Bernie wants to dismantle Medicare, that he'll take health care away from millions of people, that his supporters threw chairs in a roomful of officers that resulted in no pictures, video, injuries or arrests, and puts out that *their* deliberate, considered strategic decision is to "disqualify him, and unite the party later" then goes around saying that they "expect" Bernie will unite the party. They seem to think it's Bernie's job to go around rebuilding bridges that Hillary Clinton consciously and reflectively decided to burn.
msongs
(67,420 posts)eggplant
(3,911 posts)ancianita
(36,095 posts)Mona
(135 posts)...and I keep trying to convince myself I could vote for Hillary over Trump, but I'm finding it really difficult to do. Articles like this pretty much guarantee that I won't be able to vote for her. She has no respect, and no integrity. What an effed up election this is going to be. I'll probably show up to vote down the ticket. For now, looking forward to *finally* casting my vote for Bernie on Tuesday.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)Sure you are a Dem.
Pretty silly reply. I'd be offended, but not worth the energy.
elleng
(130,974 posts)She says he should do WHAT? Heckuva way to run a railroad, eh???
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Just because Bernie says I should "line up behind Hillary" doesn't mean I am going to. Sorry - I march to my own drum - always have. always will.
There is no way in this beautiful world that I would vote for someone who promotes War; who does not believe in LGBT rights (in her heart wholly - you know not during campaigning); or who believes any child should be "brought to heel".
Those are just my TOP three reasons...I believe I have over 100 reasons not to vote for Hillary.
No more lesser of two evils for this Democratic Woman. Both Trump and Hillary are immoral.
Response to Silver_Witch (Reply #72)
tomsmom22 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)urbuddha
(363 posts)Never will vote for Hillary Clinton, EVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She is for fracking which is poisoning our water. She supports GMO'S which are
poisoning our food supply. Franklin Delano Roosevelt said, "The nation that destroys
its soil, destroys itself."
F.D.R. is right and Hillary Clinton is dead wrong.
She is a notorious liar. Bernie has a long history of being trustworthy and steadfast.
However, I do hope he breaks his promise to support Hillary if she wins the nomination.
She stole the nomination by rigging elections throughout the country. Bernie could
beat Hillary and Donald if he runs as a third party candidate.
Hillary is a warmonger. She does not care how many of our children she kills.
Never Hillary, EVER !
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)to support Bernie Sanders as our presidential nominee at the 2016 Democratic Convention.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)I'll write in Sanders.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)but I don't have one.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)The anti-choice movement thanks you for your vote. Hispanic hating racists thank you for your vote. Paul Ryan thanks you for your vote.
Wolf
Gene Debs
(582 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:17 PM - Edit history (2)
loving, gay-rights foot-dragging, private prison money-taking, frack-happy Wall street ass-kissing pathological liar. I'm beyond tired of this ridiculous bullshit canard, and I'm sure you know what you can do with your thanks.
HeartoftheMidwest
(309 posts)1) "Anti-choice movement"........Ms. Clinton has signaled that she is willing to compromise on some aspects of abortion ( 2nd and 3rd trimester issues. ) Nothing like signaling to the anti-choice folks that your backing of Roe V. Wade is negotiable.
2)"Hispanic(s)".....Ms. Clinton has stated she sees no problem sending children and families fleeing the violence in South and Central America back into danger, because she doesn't want more people,fleeing violence, to head north. But she cares so much about Latinos that she carries hot sauce around in her purse.
3) "GOP and Paul Ryan"...the Clinton camp has already sent representatives out to talk to major GOP donors, and Wall Street has already lined up behind her. But then, her platform is and will be for the oligarchy.....
....not for us peons.
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)with us, or you're with. .."
Now where have I heard this before?
Hekate
(90,714 posts)...they have always been Democrats, or have voted D over R in November every 4 years.
In my long voting experience I've often seen my favorites fail to make it past the primaries -- but oddly enough no Democrat has ever caused me to hold my nose. Not when the alternative has been Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2. McCain, Trump....
First-timers, anarchists, total purists, the young and naive, bitter online denizens -- well, they may not come home to the Democratic Party if it was never their home in the first place. Some of the online folks may say we have to be nice or they won't vote for the nominee, but there are people who can't be persuaded, and sometimes we workers just have to cut our losses and move on.
Hillary is working heart and soul for us. It was she who brought a socialized medicine bill to Congress, not Sanders -- and the GOP crucified her for it. She was FLOTUS then. Did Bernie support her in that endeavor, or was it not good enough for him? Anyway, she's worked for the people all her life, and she's learned how to be effective.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)prove she can be a candidate that truly stands up for the Democratic (largely Progressive) principles that she has been copying from Bernie for so long now.
I wouldn't advise Bernie to move out, or to change his point of view that the final determination as to candidate will happen at the convention.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Nobody cares what you want.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)differs from yours, billary.no fracking, for instance, no pipelines such as keystone, no more wars, tpp & tpip, a living wage of $15, reigning in wall street, eliminating the privatized prisons, wars, rebuilding the nations infrastructure and creating jobs, on immigration, eliminating student debt and paying for public college and public university tuition with a higher tax on wall street speculation, no gmo's, etc., etc.
besides, we are in it to win it for bernie and for us. see you at the convention.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)It doesn't get more surreal than this folks.
Talk about being out of touch. She's not only out of touch with the people, she's out of touch with reality. As is the right wing of the Dem Party. When has there ever been a candidate running for president who is under FBI investigation? What other person could be in this situation and not have the entire party call on them to step down?
They are so afraid of Bernie and his desire to take the govt back from the corporate masters and hand it back over to the people.
.
pengu
(462 posts)Especially after her disgusting campaign of lies and cheats.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Thanks for nothin'.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Go go go Bernie!!!! I
marble falls
(57,106 posts)loser and support the ticket led by Bernie.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Real progressives will never support Hillary. We Sanders supporters won't give up our values because Bernie asks us too.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)SamKnause
(13,108 posts)I EXPECT.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)Obama Clinches Nomination; First Black Candidate to Lead a Major Party Ticket
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/us/politics/04elect.html
JUNE 4th, 2008
and yet, AND YET, hillary still went on to the convention.
so, hillary, which history to you wish to observe?
history is so inconvenient.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)As for me, I shall merely expectorate.
Response to big_dog (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I expect Bernie will do as he feels best.
moondust
(19,993 posts)Response to big_dog (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Not going to participate in any way. I'm done. I no longer care what happens.