Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,427 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:43 PM Jun 2016

Judge in Stanford sexual assault case receives death threats

Source: ABC 7 Chicago

Thursday, June 09, 2016 07:09AM


STANFORD, Calif. --
A Palo Alto judge is now receiving death threats as rage grows over the six-month sentence he gave a former Stanford swimmer convicted of sexual assault. As a result, security has been beefed up at the courthouse.


"He has received threats and his family has received threats," said Santa Clara County Public Defender Gary Goodman.

As a veteran public defender, Goodman is in Judge Aaron Persky's courtroom almost daily.

Persky is the judge who gave former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner a six-month sentence for sexual assault. A recall campaign is underway.

"He's a kind man, he's a well measured man, he's an excellent jurist,' said Goodman. "He follows the rules. He follows the statutes. He follows the process. The process worked here."

Read more: http://abc7chicago.com/news/judge-in-stanford-sexual-assault-case-receives-death-threats/1378215/

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge in Stanford sexual assault case receives death threats (Original Post) Stuart G Jun 2016 OP
that is just wrong. it would have been more appropriate to say be careful where you pass out drunk yurbud Jun 2016 #1
so you are blaming the victim..... chillfactor Jun 2016 #3
No. I think he was saying the judge shouldn't do that. Aristus Jun 2016 #8
At least someone correctly read response #1. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #14
thank you. yurbud Jun 2016 #24
Anytime... Aristus Jun 2016 #30
I meant say that to the JUDGE rather than threatening to kill him. yurbud Jun 2016 #28
Wow farleftlib Jun 2016 #6
Tomorrows headline, 'Goodman receives death threats!' peace13 Jun 2016 #2
Language matters. katsy Jun 2016 #4
Death threats are inappropriate in all cases farleftlib Jun 2016 #5
Death threats are inappropriate in all cases..........Yes, I agree totally Stuart G Jun 2016 #7
I agree he was lenient Blue_Adept Jun 2016 #10
Absolutely correct farleftlib Jun 2016 #15
Mitigating factor: Both the judge and the defendant are/were Stanford athletes. (n/t) Iggo Jun 2016 #19
It's better to have him removed from the bench IronLionZion Jun 2016 #9
I'm hearing they'd need 70k signatures and 100k dollars to get recall on the ballot for 2017. Iggo Jun 2016 #18
I work in that district elljay Jun 2016 #20
I believe they have to wait until his new term starts (in January?) Iggo Jun 2016 #22
He won reelection? Mz Pip Jun 2016 #25
He ran unopposed. Iggo Jun 2016 #31
Here's how it works elljay Jun 2016 #37
Got it. Mz Pip Jun 2016 #38
This quote is rich, coming from the court: christx30 Jun 2016 #11
Awesome response, keylargo Jun 2016 #16
This is how the world works now ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #12
There are people who do that just for shits and giggles jberryhill Jun 2016 #17
Goodman, the public defender, says "The process worked here"????? BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #13
Exactly! smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #21
I'm so sick of this shit BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #26
I completely understand Blanche. smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #34
... BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #36
Call him out Mz Pip Jun 2016 #23
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #27
The guy should undergo some form of judicial review. And if he is elected, he should be removed in Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #29
Next election six years out. Iggo Jun 2016 #32
There should be a recall campaign. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #33
Death threats are NEVER OK ailsagirl Jun 2016 #35

Aristus

(66,369 posts)
8. No. I think he was saying the judge shouldn't do that.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

No one with a brain thinks the victim brought it on herself. But the judge does. So, he should be careful where he passes out...

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
2. Tomorrows headline, 'Goodman receives death threats!'
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

This is a sad situation. Not sure justice was served.

katsy

(4,246 posts)
4. Language matters.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jun 2016

I wish people would articulate their disgust in any way other than threatening violence.

I didn't realize this horrible judge had a family... Wonder if he thought about them before letting a violent rapist free. What if brock hadn't been stopped? What if what if what if. What if it was his wife that had been raped.

Funny he didn't take into account the violence inflicted upon the victim but is so "threatened" by violent words. Just another entitled asshole that one is.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
5. Death threats are inappropriate in all cases
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:53 PM
Jun 2016

but the judge was shockingly lenient with this jock-off. The victim feels like she's been raped
all over again no doubt. I hope he gets thrown off the bench or whatever consequences are
appropriate here. The guy was acting like a sexual predator not just that night but even a
week before. He still feels like he's the victim here.

Let's hope Karma takes care of both misogynists.

Stuart G

(38,427 posts)
7. Death threats are inappropriate in all cases..........Yes, I agree totally
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jun 2016

"If he gets thrown off the bench or whatever consequences appropriate here" Is also logical..but threatening to kill the judge??

I don't believe that is an answer.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
10. I agree he was lenient
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

The problem is that what he did was allowed within the laws and sentencing that's established.

The focus should be less on the messenger, the judge, and on the laws and fixing them to something that's more appropriate for the crime committed.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
15. Absolutely correct
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:14 PM
Jun 2016

However, there were no mitigating factors but a couple of aggravating ones. This guy had
been manhandling women all that night and at other parties. He obviously felt entitled by his
jock status to just take whatever he wanted and the judge reinforced that disgusting and
misogynistic attitude with the light sentence.

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
9. It's better to have him removed from the bench
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jun 2016

there are more effective ways to punish him that will hopefully set precedent for future judicial cases

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
18. I'm hearing they'd need 70k signatures and 100k dollars to get recall on the ballot for 2017.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 06:08 PM
Jun 2016

I don't know if that's signatures from registered voters statewide or if they have to be from people in his district.

I do know I'd sign and I'd also kick in a few bucks. Totally worth it.

elljay

(1,178 posts)
20. I work in that district
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jun 2016

though I live in the next county. From what I am hearing, they would get 70k signatures in a day once the word got out and 100k would not at all be a problem.

Mz Pip

(27,445 posts)
25. He won reelection?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jun 2016

Yuck. What's wrong with people in that district? How could anyone support this douche?

elljay

(1,178 posts)
37. Here's how it works
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 12:52 AM
Jun 2016

No one filed to oppose him, so his name was not on the primary ballot on Tuesday. In November, he will be automatically re-elected. I don't know whether it is possible to write in a candidate.

Mz Pip

(27,445 posts)
38. Got it.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jun 2016

There were Facebook posts saying this guy was up for reelection. Sounded like he had an opponent.

Well, maybe a write in or maybe a recall.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
11. This quote is rich, coming from the court:
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016
"He follows the rules. He follows the statutes. He follows the process. The process worked here."


I'd ask this guy 2 questions: Would a young black male at a club receive a 6 month sentence for sexual assault on an unconscious victim? If not, then the system didn't work.
And, 2, if this happened to your daughter, or someone else that you loved, and the perp got a 6 month sentence, would you be ok with that? If not, then, no idiot, obviously the process didn't work.

Sorry the judge is getting death threats. Absolutely breaks my heart. But no one making the threat should go to jail for that 2 minutes of verbal action.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
12. This is how the world works now
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jun 2016

Become the eye of a swirling controversy, get threatened.

Not saying it's right, it just is.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
17. There are people who do that just for shits and giggles
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:43 PM
Jun 2016

Headlines of the form:

&quot Person Named In News Item) Receives Death Threats" is sort of like "Sun Expected To Rise In Morning".

And the story of this form is inevitably used as an example of "see how nasty people who believe X are".

I'm pretty convinced that people just send emails and crap at principals in news stories of note, for no actual purpose other than feeding the internet outrage machinery itself.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
13. Goodman, the public defender, says "The process worked here"?????
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016

WTF????????? You're a public defender, you're invested in perpetrators getting off lightly.

FUCK YOU!!!! The process did NOT work---A woman's life was devalued, mocked, ravaged out of "concern" for a rapist's future success....because misogyny ruled this process.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
26. I'm so sick of this shit
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jun 2016

so sick of sexism, and the way it's some goddamned joke. Rape is about concern for not victimizing the rapists.
Just posted an excellent article from rawstory in Good Reads....Sad to see all the voyeuristic TandA ads below the article, though.


I'm in a very very bad mood.

Mz Pip

(27,445 posts)
23. Call him out
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jun 2016

Call him names, but don't make death threats. It's probably illegal and counter productive.

Response to Stuart G (Original post)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
29. The guy should undergo some form of judicial review. And if he is elected, he should be removed in
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jun 2016

next election.

Death threats are unacceptable.

ailsagirl

(22,897 posts)
35. Death threats are NEVER OK
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:17 PM
Jun 2016

We have legal ways of removing an incompetent judge-- let's look into those avenues.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge in Stanford sexual ...