Trump to meet with NRA about banning gun sales for terror watch list
Source: Politico
Donald Trump will meet with the National Rifle Association to discuss preventing people on the terror watch list or no-fly list from buying guns, he announced Wednesday.
I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns, Trump tweeted Wednesday.
Trumps position breaks from the NRA, which endorsed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee last month and dismissed such bans just one day ago as ineffective or unconstitutional, if not both.
Restrictions like bans on gun purchases by people on watch lists are ineffective, unconstitutional, or both, the NRA tweeted Tuesday.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-nra-meeting-224362
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)(munch munch munch)
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Response to C_U_L8R (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Trump's either a traitor to the NRA or he's their lapdog. Doh !!
hexola
(4,835 posts)Freepers are not happy!
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3440381/posts
I've been kind of waiting for Trump to "step in it" with regards to 2nd Amendment issues - which Im certain he is tone deaf to (with regards to his followers.)
Zorro
(15,740 posts)and every day that goes by is another day where their utter cravenness is on display to the world.
Hope he keeps reiterating that gun purchases should be restricted for "those people".
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)TeamPooka
(24,227 posts)Botany
(70,508 posts)I suppose since the NRA owns so many congresspeople they get to make the
laws such as the repeal in 2004 of the assualt weapons ban.
The NRA is not about protecting American's rights but about helping to
protect the gun industry's right to make $$$ off of all the bloodshed.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)have been blocking new gun regulation for decades. Why is such a small group of malcontents allowed to terrorize the rest of the nation? That's the real question.
Botany
(70,508 posts)As qualified a person as you could ever have .... Dr. Murthy had studied the link between
guns and gun deaths.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivek_Murthy
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)hexola
(4,835 posts)Thats how this should look - and how it should be spun - "Trump is a liberal on 2nd Amendment issues - he wants to take our guns!"
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)the Republican base is hiding under!
It's really amazing.
Like an actual plan.
forgotmylogin
(7,528 posts)He is likely going to see whether they will drop support for him or if they'll concede on this point so they can be in sync. He doesn't want to lose that base. It's his most important.
hexola
(4,835 posts)Win or spin - could be a big moment.
CincyDem
(6,362 posts)While it pains me to say this, Trump could squeeze this lemon into some lemonade. Imagine the conversation...
Trump: I appreciate that you've supported me. Thank you. Now it's time to deal.
NRA: We don't deal.
Trump: Everybody deals. Here's what I'm offering. I double down on my second amendment commitment for people not on the no-fly list. You support me in closing down this no-fly list ban.
NRA: We don't deal.
Trump: Here's my last offer. I double down on my second amendment commitment for people not on the no-fly list. You support me in closing down this no-fly list ban.
NRA: We don't deal.
Trump: OK - why don't you walk over the the HRC offices and see if you get a better deal because you and I both know someone, somewhere is going to do something in the net 4 years that will finally put a dent in that shiny PR position. I'll guarantee you the no-fly list is the end of the road for any restrictions...with her, you know it'll only be the beginning. I could really use this to show I can make deals and you need this more than you realize. What do you say? Deal...I throw in a hotel.
NRA: (after much silence)....ahhh...where's the hotel?
This mofo just might pull it off. While I would love that outcome, I hate to think it might come from asshat.
Just reading posts
(688 posts)TeamPooka
(24,227 posts)him they can cave to anyone and they politically can't afford to let that happen.
Ever.
CincyDem
(6,362 posts)Can' wait until someone declares them a terrorist organization. They've done more to ensure street killers have access to lethal force than any other organization. I hope I live that long.
Yavin4
(35,440 posts)They want to give children guns.
Yonnie3
(17,441 posts)his real position on guns is or was or will be. He will say a bunch of things trying to make a deal with them, all of what he says won't amount to much as it can be interpreted as having many different meanings and change again next week.
As my grandma would have said, "would you buy a used car from this man?'
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)He's gonna get his combover handed to him.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)Hey Trump, tell Paul Ryan.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)maryellen99
(3,789 posts)They are now calling him a flip flopping con man
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Granted if he gets the NRA on board, that would help.
askeptic
(478 posts)...and that people will realize that violating the 5th (no due process for the watchlist) is not the way to go about things. Do we really want to establish the idea that due process of law is just outmoded thinking and we should just trust big brother to decide who has Constitutional rights and who doesn't?
I don't care how much you hate guns, taking other rights away in your zealotry is the path to ruin for all of us.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)angrychair
(8,699 posts)Ridicule him. He deserves it.
Don't underestimate him.
Far to many, on both sides, have done so and that is why we act so stunned when calling this racist, ignorant asshole the teapublican nominee.
If he manages to get a deal and the NRA concedes ground on banning guns for watch lists folks it could be a significant boost for him.
We have to be prepared for that possible outcome.
stay true to our Democratic principles and continue to fight against the hate and bigotry of tRump and his followers.
mark67
(196 posts)Kudos to him if he pulls this off.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Bernie supporters? Environmentalists? Zionists? Jewish people? Christians? TEA Party people? Or just Muslims?
I am sorry, I am very pro-gun control, but the idea of a secret government group getting to pick who can exercise a Constitutional right is downright creepy, and would be destroyed in court in about 2 seconds.
The Republicans would use this to target minority communities in a heart beat --- and don't forget they used to do this. Most "gun laws" in the South were about disarming blacks so the KKK could have free reign. The rich and powerful will always get their weapons (e.g., Trump has a concealed carry permit in NYC, which is damn near impossible to get).
It is something right out of the Pre-Crime Division in that terrible Tom Cruise movie whose name I forget.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)If he is serous about this, he should be meeting with congressional Republicans.
I suspect he isn't serious.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)This is Trump's entire list of beliefs:
1) I'm awesome and everyone has to know about it.
That's it. Nothing else. His entire pathetic existence revolves around being the center of attention. He really is that simplistic. He's a 70-year-old man child whose brain never evolved past puberty.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)That pretty much explains everthing. For example, I believe that attention was his main motivation for becoming the king of the Birthers.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)ymetca
(1,182 posts)..something straight out of a B.C. comic strip, I'll wager.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)that it is CONGRESS who gets to make the decision, not the NRA.
Eugene
(61,899 posts)No link yet.
askeptic
(478 posts)The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of peopleincluding U.S. citizensas terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence.
The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching. They can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel. And while the government keeps the evidence it uses to blacklist people in this manner secret, government watchdogs have found that as many as 35 percent of the nominations to the network of watchlists are outdated and tens of thousands of names were placed on lists without an adequate factual basis. To make matters worse, the government denies watchlisted individuals any meaningful way to correct errors and clear their names.
https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/watchlists
Note: This is really about the 5th Amendment. People should read it to see if they want the right wing removing it for them...
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Suspects
I get the idea. I get the political goal of sounding reasonable to make the Republicans look like the putzes they are.
But a secret list by an unaccountable government to deprive people of rights is a stupid, stupid, idea and violates every tenant of due process.
I lived through Nixon's enemy list days. I don't need that crap again.
sarisataka
(18,655 posts)will be against these lists again?
Eugene
(61,899 posts)Source: Reuters
Sales to people on terrorism watch lists should be delayed: NRA
The National Rifle Association said on Wednesday it stood by its position on terrorism watch lists and access to firearms, saying sales to potential buyers who are on the lists should be delayed while they are investigated by the FBI.
In a statement, the gun lobbying group said it welcomed a meeting with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. It also said protections needed to be put in place to allow people wrongfully put on a terrorism watch list to be removed.
(Reporting by Washington newsroom; Editing by Mohammad Zargham and Lisa Von Ahn)
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-florida-shooting-guns-nra-idUSKCN0Z123H
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Which will be overturned in less than 2 fucking seconds by a court for removing a citizen's right to due process.
There's not even a way for people to find out if they're on the list, or to get off of a list.
So, for months we're going to do this, and the ban is going to last for 3 whole days before someone files a case against it. They couldn't have planned it better.