Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 03:13 PM Jun 2012

Report: Issa Staffer Offered To Stop Holder Contempt Vote For DOJ Scalp

Source: talkingpointsmemo.com

Rep. Darrell Issa’s chief investigative counsel offered to stop the contempt vote against Attorney General Eric Holder in exchange for the resignation of Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, Newsweek’s Dan Klaidman is reporting.

Issa staffer Stephen Castor brought up the issue of “accountability” during a phone call with a senior DOJ official last week, according to the report. Castor reportedly said they could head off the contempt vote if Breuer stepped down.

Breuer, who heads the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, apologized in October for not telling other Justice Department officials that guns were allowed to “walk” during the Bush administration when Congress first raised questions about Operation Fast And Furious in early 2011.

Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/06/report_issa_staffer_offered_to_stop_holder_contempt_vote_for_doj_scalp.php?ref=fpa

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Issa Staffer Offered To Stop Holder Contempt Vote For DOJ Scalp (Original Post) Grassy Knoll Jun 2012 OP
I guess they are not as interested in documents as they are in a scalp. n/t hrmjustin Jun 2012 #1
That is all it is ever about liberal N proud Jun 2012 #2
I have a better explanation slackmaster Jun 2012 #10
This would be a good reason to invoke Executive Privilege in support of the separation of power. Jumping John Jun 2012 #3
I thought they wanted Napolitano. 6000eliot Jun 2012 #4
I'm telling you, Holder knows the skinny on DOJ Capture. nt patrice Jun 2012 #5
You resign first, Issa Woody Woodpecker Jun 2012 #6
Isn't that proof why they are doing this contempt crap. SoutherDem Jun 2012 #7
Extortion? Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 #8
I think republicans call it bi-partisanship. progressoid Jun 2012 #11
I thought this was a racist vendetta against Holder because of the voter suppression thing slackmaster Jun 2012 #9
Could always point out this story makes the Republicans sound somewhat reasonable jeff47 Jun 2012 #14
Or a tactical move to make Nancy Pelosi and Al Sharpton sound unreasonable slackmaster Jun 2012 #17
I believe that's termed blackmail, plain and simple. Didn't know that was legal. shraby Jun 2012 #12
It worked with the national debt, so they think it'll work here LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2012 #15
sounds like desperation.... madrchsod Jun 2012 #13
right, & the contempt campaign is linked to a wacky---Rachel explained, I'll find the link wordpix Jun 2012 #18
here's the link about Rachel's report, or go directly to her vid at msnbc wordpix Jun 2012 #19
Oh no! What will Issa's little gungeon pals say? Kingofalldems Jun 2012 #16
they're taking our guns b/c it's a conspiracy to not take our guns to make wordpix Jun 2012 #20
I think that is called "criminal conduct" over at DoJ, something Issa knows about first-hand, OR L. Coyote Jun 2012 #21
Don't know yet whether current conduct or past clang1 Jun 2012 #23
Maybe it is time to release all the data on fast and furious including Thinkingabout Jun 2012 #22
the docs asked for cannot be released, such as grand jury testimony. See this video, explains all: wordpix Jun 2012 #26
If they're looking for a witch hunt, zbdent Jun 2012 #24
WTF?? Blackmail is now a congressional procedure? DCBob Jun 2012 #25

liberal N proud

(60,335 posts)
2. That is all it is ever about
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 03:22 PM
Jun 2012

The GOP is always on a witch hunt when it comes to Democrats. Holder being appointed by President Obama is considered part of the Democratic Administration.



 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
10. I have a better explanation
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 03:58 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 04:37 PM - Edit history (1)

Anything to embarrass the President in an election year.

 

Jumping John

(930 posts)
3. This would be a good reason to invoke Executive Privilege in support of the separation of power.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jun 2012

Otherwise the house can just run rough shod over the executive branch and black mail the EB into doing their bidding.
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
9. I thought this was a racist vendetta against Holder because of the voter suppression thing
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jun 2012

What's our narrative here?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. Could always point out this story makes the Republicans sound somewhat reasonable
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:30 PM
Jun 2012

So it could be trying to create a more friendly narrative for the Republicans than the vendetta.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
17. Or a tactical move to make Nancy Pelosi and Al Sharpton sound unreasonable
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jun 2012

I don't know, but it does seem to me that the real agenda is to embarrass the President.

15. It worked with the national debt, so they think it'll work here
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jun 2012

If they succeed, they'll have the Administration by the balls. "You do this and we won't do that..."

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
13. sounds like desperation....
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jun 2012

obama called his bluff and issa has no where to go with his contempt campaign

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
20. they're taking our guns b/c it's a conspiracy to not take our guns to make
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:51 PM
Jun 2012

us believe they're not but they are

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
21. I think that is called "criminal conduct" over at DoJ, something Issa knows about first-hand, OR
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:52 PM
Jun 2012

how about if all the people who covered up for Bush take a WALK!

 

clang1

(884 posts)
23. Don't know yet whether current conduct or past
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:46 PM
Jun 2012

Sure it isn't about this since the GOP has so many fingers in it as well (heh and we all know the GOP does not investigate it's own corruption unless they can blame it one someone else). So who knows at this point.

U.S. AG Eric Holder, DoJ Head Lanny Breuer Linked To Banks Accused Of Foreclosure Fraud
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/eric-holder-banks-lanny-breuer_n_1218452.html

'Reuters reported in December that under Holder and Breuer, the Justice Department hasn't brought any criminal cases against big banks or other companies involved in mortgage servicing, even though copious evidence has surfaced of apparent criminal violations in foreclosure cases.'

'While Holder and Breuer were partners at Covington, the firm's clients included the four largest U.S. banks - Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo & Co - as well as at least one other bank that is among the 10 largest mortgage servicers.'

Whole damn system is rotten, everyone eating out of the others hand, on both sides and as usual We the People just get ________.

Makes me think of another post of mine on Power Structures.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
22. Maybe it is time to release all the data on fast and furious including
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 08:13 PM
Jun 2012

The guns which was not accounted for in earlier years. Let Issa prove the first gun walking began after Holder was AG

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report: Issa Staffer Offe...