Trump proposes term limits for Congress
Source: The Hill
Donald Trump on Tuesday called for term limits in Congress as part of his new ethics reform proposal.
"If Im elected president I will push for a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress, Trump said at a rally in Colorado Springs, Colo. "Decades of failure in Washington and decades of special interest dealing must and will come to an end.
"Not only will it end our government corruption, but we will end the economic stagnation that were in right now no growth," Trump added of the proposal.
Trump released a five-point ethics plan Monday night in an effort to "drain the swamp" in Washington.
-snip-
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301611-trump-proposes-term-limits-for-congress-members
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301611-trump-proposes-term-limits-for-congress-members
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)Someone embroiled in hundreds of ethics violation and who brags that he buys politician
He'll say any shit to be elected
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)It's all making sense, now.
DK504
(3,847 posts)"Donald Trump on Tuesday called for term limits in Congress as part of his new ethics reform proposal. "
Oh that's rich coming from this piece of walking excrement. WOW. Maybe Jr. can help with that since he is so sensitive to people's needs.
underpants
(182,868 posts)Not the raping
Saviolo
(3,283 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)Because lobbyists will have more influence over inexperienced legislators.
JHB
(37,161 posts)...but it's nice to have backup.
It turns the legislators into pass-throughs, while lobbyists and staff-for-hire stick around. They have the institutional memory and thorough knowledge of the rules to get things done, or keep things from being done.
It simply moves the actual ability to do things farther from accountability to the voters.
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Term limits were enacted in 2002 and it has been a nightmare!
Lobbyists have more influence because after their term is finished, they go to work for the lobbyist firms and then write legislation and hand it off to clueless newbies.
Republicans pushed they idea and they love it, because they have the money to promote news names every coupld of years. Incumbancy works in the favor of Democrats. Republicans strength is in running for office, and Democrats strength is in governing.
Aside from all that, when they work together for a long time, they build relationships, respect for each other and they used to work together.
When the inexperienced tea party candidates got elected, it created almost exactly what began here in 2003 in MO. A lot of progressives support this, but if we think congress is dysfuntional now term limits would make it way worse.
gohuskies
(1,156 posts)This P.O.S. is such a pathologic liar who cannot stop projecting his own serious character flaws on to others. He won't ever take any kind of personal responsibility for his bullshit. And unfortunately he passes this shit in in his demon spawn progeny. Go F yourself Fonny.
irisblue
(33,019 posts)It has not worked as well as I had hoped. Lobbyists are "guiding" too many of the more rural republican legislators.
rurallib
(62,444 posts)nice to know there is some real life experience with this. Thanks.
Jim__
(14,083 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Good Lord. It's amateur hour.
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)How many in Congress are willing to vote themselves out of a job?
hibbing
(10,109 posts)I find term limits very undemocratic. My state legislature has them.
Peace
LisaM
(27,827 posts)It leads to incessant turnover, lack of institutional knowledge, zero incentive for people in different parties to forge alliances and work together, and a fat cat contract with a lobbying firm afterwards as a quid pro quo.
I have never understood the appeal. Maybe you get rid of a few bad players in the short term, but who wants to bring in a completely inexperienced Congress every two to four years? How does that serve our interests? Would you get rid of a mechanic or a dentist or a doctor that you liked after two years and bring in someone completely green who didn't know you the way the old one did?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)Maybe he can join Obamas group after his defeat to fix that
apnu
(8,758 posts)The lack of term limits (and gerrymandering) is what keeps Republicans a float. Imagine what America would be like if more and more people were tossed out of office due to term limits and someone new came up. Consider how diverse the nation is and how that diversity is increasing, rapidly I'd like to add.
The Goldwater conservative revolution is dying right now, the next generations, starting with millennials, think its crap. Put term-limits into the mix and Conservative America is dead.
So by all means, Donnie, push for term limits. Be my guest.
Since term limits were enacted in my state, republicans have a supermajority that just keeps growing. It takes more money to win the first time than Dems can usually raise.
apnu
(8,758 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Term limits were enacted in 2002 and we lost the majority right away. Now they have a 116 seats in the House and we have 45 plus 1 independent.
The Senate is 24 Rs - 7 Ds with 3 vacancies to be filled this year
treestar
(82,383 posts)He knows it exists!
Who knew?!
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Ban all private donations and make all federal and state elections taxpayer funded.
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)If someone is no longer a good representative, the voters should be the ones who decide that, not some artificial (and currently unconstitutional) rule. If someone is a good representative, such as John Lewis, they should be allowed to run for as long as the voters keep voting them in. Why deny voters that right? Term limits are a vote of no confidence in democracy. It was a right wing reaction to FDR, and is always pushed hardest by right wingers...for a reason. Right wingers have more money and can start a campaign as a newbie more easily. Lefties tend not to have money, but gain popular support while in office, and use that popularity to stay in office, despite often being outspent by their right win opponents.
keithbvadu2
(36,886 posts)Sounded good in the campaign and then they ignored it.
PSPS
(13,614 posts)turbinetree
(24,713 posts)and your small hand fingers in there pant pockets, it's called VOTING, got that, let me repeat it one more time it's called VOTING, you know the system that your republican ilk have been trying to eviscerate.
But then again you are going around and saying the election is rigged, either or there donnie, what is it.
And if you would just sit down and think about it, if you get in power your republican ilk would further the damage the voting full blown with a "means test", look at what the right wing supreme court did.
And as for special interests, what do you have to say about the NRA or how about the special interest supporting the destruction in North Dakota, there donnie. The same bankers that funded your corruption and bankruptcy in Atlantic City----------no thanks.
And if you wanted to get the corruption out of government just think of what Bernie Sanders did, he got $27.00 on average and did not accept any money from bankers, hedge funds or from the enablers such as the Koch's, the Popes and anyone else from Wall Street bankers
tanyev
(42,601 posts)metroins
(2,550 posts)We need term limits.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Such a Libertarian view of the Federal Government....
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Some of the most powerful members of Congress are ranking members and black because blacks and Dems are gerrymandered into districts so unbalanced a Republican will never unseat them. So this.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)Zero terms.