Fox’s Bret Baier Walks Back Flawed Reporting About “Likely” Clinton Indictment
Source: Media Matters
Fox News’ Bret Baier walked back his November 2 claim, which was based on two unnamed sources, that FBI investigations relating to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will “continue to likely an indictment.” On the November 3 edition of Fox’s Happening Now, Baier described his comments as “inartful,” acknowledging that “that’s not the process.” Baier’s uncritical reporting of anonymous, unvetted sources has been parroted by a stream of Fox hosts and correspondents, as well as right-wing blogs.
The Daily Beast has reported on a pipeline between conservative FBI agents (both active and retired) -- angered by FBI Director James Comey’s conclusion in July that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any indictment in the review of Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state -- and Fox News. According to The Daily Beast, “Trump supporters with strong ties to the agency kept talking about surprises and leaks to come -- and come they did.” From the November 3 edition of Fox News’ Happening Now:
MARTHA MACCALLUM (CO-HOST): The FBI sources that you spoke with suggest that an indictment is likely. That would prove -- go ahead.
BRET BAIER: I want to be clear -- I want to be clear about this, and this was -- came from a Q and A that I did with Brit Hume after my show and after we went through everything. He asked me if, after the election, if Hillary Clinton wins, will this investigation continue, and I said, “yes absolutely.” I pressed the sources again and again what would happen. I got to the end of that and said, “they have a lot of evidence that would, likely lead to an indictment.” But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered. That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don't move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I'm told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward. There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.
Read more: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/03/fox-s-bret-baier-walks-back-flawed-reporting-about-likely-clinton-indictment/214274?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MediaMattersForAmerica-All+%28Media+Matters+for+America%29
Trump today repeated this story as true.
In 2006, one of the most respected television journalists in US history, Dan Rather, was fired because he relied on faulty documents regarding a true story (George W. Bush's AWOL during his Texas National Guard Service).
Meanwhile, a complete hack like Bret Baier can throw bullshit against the wall 5 days before an election claiming that the Clintons are going to be "indicted" by the FBI, Trump gladly parrots the bullshit, and I'm sure Fox won't think twice about what he just did.
It's a sad, sad state of affairs.
= new reply since forum marked as read
heads should roll on shit like this.
These people have no shame.
