EPA Scientists' Work May Face 'Case By Case' Review By Trump Team, Official Says
Source: NPR
Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency who want to publish or present their scientific findings likely will need to have their work reviewed on a "case by case basis" before it can be disseminated, according to a spokesman for the agency's transition team.
In an interview Tuesday evening with NPR, Doug Ericksen, the head of communications for the Trump administration's EPA transition team, said that during the transition period, he expects scientists will undergo an unspecified internal vetting process before sharing their work outside the agency.
"We'll take a look at what's happening so that the voice coming from the EPA is one that's going to reflect the new administration," Ericksen told NPR.
-snip-
Any review would directly contradict the agency's current scientific integrity policy, which was published in 2012. It prohibits "all EPA employees, including scientists, managers and other Agency leadership from suppressing, altering, or otherwise impeding the timely release of scientific findings or conclusions."
-snip-
Read more: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/25/511572169/epa-scientists-work-may-face-case-by-case-review-by-trump-team-official-says
neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)Instead of review, it should just be called what it is: censorship.
Freethinker65
(10,061 posts)Science is not about surpressing data that does not fit your hypothesis
2naSalit
(86,802 posts)DODI
(2,144 posts)Keep on eye on this - and then we need to support them in every city! This administration is terrifying!
http://www.scientistsmarchonwashington.com/2017/01/what-is-scientists-march-on-washington.html
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)This is not America, this is not normal, this is wrong, and it has to be stopped.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)unfortunately, I am still here and apparently facts have been replaced by "alternate facts" (ie whatever made up sh*t tRump and his deranged vulgar band of lackeys want them to be)
ffr
(22,672 posts)Ultimately.
They want to hear nice pleasantries, knowing full well that what they are hearing is censored lies about things that impact them and their families directly.
The wrecking ball KGOP is winning for Putin.
Botany
(70,589 posts)science
[sahy-uh ns]
Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.
a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws:
the mathematical sciences.
2.
systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3.
any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4.
systematized knowledge in general.
5.
knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6.
a particular branch of knowledge.
7.
skill, especially reflecting a precise application of facts or principles; proficiency.
IronLionZion
(45,540 posts)same with Education, Energy, CFPB, and anything else that's useful. USDA, FDA, etc.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)and let them do their work for the states. If the Fed govt wants to get out of the science business, so be it. Science and progress will continue without the US govt.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)ffr
(22,672 posts)This is a Eastern Block tactic to control.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,368 posts)... conducted by Trofim Lysenko, his followers and Soviet authorities. Lysenko served as the director of the Soviet Union's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Lysenkoism began in the late 1920s and formally ended in 1964. The term Lysenkoism can also be used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives.[1]
The pseudo-scientific ideas of Lysenkoism built on Lamarckian concepts of the heritability of acquired characteristics.[2] Lysenko's theory rejected Mendelian inheritance and the concept of the "gene"; it departed from Darwinian evolutionary theory by rejecting natural selection.[3] Proponents falsely claimed to have discovered, among many other things, that rye could transform into wheat and wheat into barley, that weeds could spontaneously transmute into food grains, and that "natural cooperation" was observed in nature as opposed to "natural selection".[3] Lysenkoism promised extraordinary advances in breeding and in agriculture that never came about.
Joseph Stalin supported the campaign. More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were sent to prison, fired,[4] or executed as a part of this campaign - instigated by Lysenko to suppress his scientific opponents. The president of the Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, was sent to prison and died there, while scientific research in the field of genetics was effectively destroyed until the death of Stalin in 1953.[3] Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines was also negatively affected or banned.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism