Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,588 posts)
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:40 PM Feb 2017

Police: Wal-Mart Customer Fatally Shoots Suspected Thief

Source: Associated Press


By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ORLANDO, Fla. — Feb 5, 2017, 10:34 AM ET


Police say a customer at a Wal-Mart store in Florida fatally shot a man who was among a group suspected of stealing two carts full of merchandise.

The Orange County Sheriff's Office said in a statement that the shooting occurred Saturday after suspects left the store with stolen items.

Sheriff's Capt. A.L. Nieves says the men were loading the merchandise into a car when a worker and a customer who came to the employee's aid confronted them.

Nieves says the customer was armed and fired at a suspect, who he thought was going for a weapon. Nieves did not identify anyone involved.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/police-wal-mart-customer-fatally-shoots-suspected-thief-45280953

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police: Wal-Mart Customer Fatally Shoots Suspected Thief (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2017 OP
I hope they got video of the shooting that shows the person actually reaching for something cstanleytech Feb 2017 #1
Don't forget that Florida has 'stand your ground' groundloop Feb 2017 #9
Stand your ground has limits as Raul Rodriguez discovered when he tried that defense. nt cstanleytech Feb 2017 #11
If the dead man was black, then that's all the "felt threatened" that some people need Orrex Feb 2017 #13
The "felt" has to meet the Reasonable Man definition. ManiacJoe Feb 2017 #15
Stand your ground doesn't cover "shooting a shoplifter as he loads a car." Nitram Feb 2017 #49
Because a random vigilante gets to be judge, jury and executioner. Coventina Feb 2017 #2
DITTO. nt HAB911 Feb 2017 #32
Exactly! laserhaas Feb 2017 #47
Shoplifting is not a Capital Crime. madaboutharry Feb 2017 #3
I thought that big box stores have stringent policies about confronting thieves- they fire people KittyWampus Feb 2017 #37
Good that they stopped a thief, but if he nor the employee were in mortal danger, can he get away napi21 Feb 2017 #4
The belief does not need to be accurate, just reasonable. ManiacJoe Feb 2017 #18
I just hate the idea that this shooter is going tto be the poster boy for the damn NRA! napi21 Feb 2017 #19
Now we give citizens the benefit if the doubt with the "he was reaching for something" line ? Trust Buster Feb 2017 #5
a customer gOing to help ? everything about this seems wrong JI7 Feb 2017 #6
That would have been a better way to "shoot". Marie Marie Feb 2017 #20
it just confirms my belief that many gun people WANT to have a chance to shoot someone JI7 Feb 2017 #21
I hear and second that! Marie Marie Feb 2017 #23
ITA! Many of them are like that. They want to see themselves as the hero who shot somebody raccoon Feb 2017 #30
wanna be cops/soldiers..........n/t HAB911 Feb 2017 #33
He's a murder. No ones life was in danger rainy Feb 2017 #7
Other news sites are reporting that the merchandise was TalenaGor Feb 2017 #8
They can make up any excuse to justify Ilsa Feb 2017 #10
What color was the killer and the victim. Lucky Luciano Feb 2017 #12
That, unfortunately, is the surest indicator (n/t) Kennah Feb 2017 #17
Welcome to America, old guy Feb 2017 #14
never said it suspect was armed????? Cryptoad Feb 2017 #16
Why didn't this asshole just take down the license plate number and wait for the police? SunSeeker Feb 2017 #22
Because cheap crap from Wal-Mart is more than worth a human life ... eppur_se_muova Feb 2017 #24
There's definately more to this story: christx30 Feb 2017 #25
Carjacking and shoplifting are not capital offenses. Charles Bukowski Feb 2017 #26
You've got that right. Not by a long shot. Judi Lynn Feb 2017 #27
Innocent people are killed in carjacking. christx30 Feb 2017 #28
Fuck racist bullshit. jpak Feb 2017 #29
Thank you!!! Coventina Feb 2017 #39
Your logic fails. Citizens are not empowered to execute people for running red lights Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #35
Enough with the false equivalences. Charles Bukowski Feb 2017 #36
But the fact that these are violent felons christx30 Feb 2017 #38
And you are one of the selected jury who heard all this evidence in court? eom Coventina Feb 2017 #40
At the time who knew they were violent felons ? rickford66 Feb 2017 #41
The shooter says he thought he saw gun, which is why he open fire. christx30 Feb 2017 #42
My point was no one knew about the prior carjacking etc. rickford66 Feb 2017 #43
Because, and only because someone shot him. LanternWaste Feb 2017 #44
Play stupid games... win stupid prizes... Baconator Feb 2017 #46
Do hope the shooter gets to enjoy 3hots and a cot courtesy of the state of Florida dembotoz Feb 2017 #31
Wal-Mart likes to use free security like vigilantes HAB911 Feb 2017 #34
This happened here too. The guy got off. hollowdweller Feb 2017 #45
19 year old thief was stealing diapers and other baby items. Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2017 #48

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
1. I hope they got video of the shooting that shows the person actually reaching for something
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:43 PM
Feb 2017

otherwise this person needs to be charged with manslaughter at the very least.

groundloop

(11,520 posts)
9. Don't forget that Florida has 'stand your ground'
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:58 PM
Feb 2017

All the vigilante needs to say is that he felt threatened and he gets off scott-free.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
15. The "felt" has to meet the Reasonable Man definition.
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 09:57 PM
Feb 2017

Most people here really do not understand how the Stand Your Ground laws work.

Before one can claim SYG, one first has to rightly claim self defense.

madaboutharry

(40,216 posts)
3. Shoplifting is not a Capital Crime.
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:44 PM
Feb 2017

I hope the shooter is charged, found guilty, and sentenced appropriately. People need to understand that vigilante justice is unacceptable.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
37. I thought that big box stores have stringent policies about confronting thieves- they fire people
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:22 AM
Feb 2017

who follow or confront suspected thieves.

I think both the customer and the employee and THE STORE itself may be liable.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
4. Good that they stopped a thief, but if he nor the employee were in mortal danger, can he get away
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:45 PM
Feb 2017

with shooting someone? Doesn't someone have to rove the suspect really WAS trying to pull a gun?

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
18. The belief does not need to be accurate, just reasonable.
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 09:59 PM
Feb 2017

The "reasonable" definition for self defense is "ability, opportunity, jeopardy".

napi21

(45,806 posts)
19. I just hate the idea that this shooter is going tto be the poster boy for the damn NRA!
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 11:33 PM
Feb 2017

I bet they make TV ads trying to prove how much better things would be if EVERYBODY was armed!

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
5. Now we give citizens the benefit if the doubt with the "he was reaching for something" line ?
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:47 PM
Feb 2017

By virtue of the fact that he was intervening against 4 individuals, he approached knowing he couldn't watch 8 hands. A citizen was executed for petty theft.

JI7

(89,259 posts)
6. a customer gOing to help ? everything about this seems wrong
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 08:47 PM
Feb 2017

If they were unloading things in the car why not take a pic of them the car etc. Write down license plate number.

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)
23. I hear and second that!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 12:59 AM
Feb 2017

Look at me - I'm a GOOD guy with a GUN stopping a bad guy who may (or NOT) be armed. Shoot first, ask questions later.

raccoon

(31,112 posts)
30. ITA! Many of them are like that. They want to see themselves as the hero who shot somebody
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 08:31 AM
Feb 2017

whether he was a bad guy or not.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
10. They can make up any excuse to justify
Sun Feb 5, 2017, 09:06 PM
Feb 2017

Killing someone. I think a person could figure out a way to stage a murder with the looseness of these laws.

SunSeeker

(51,609 posts)
22. Why didn't this asshole just take down the license plate number and wait for the police?
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 12:38 AM
Feb 2017

Is it Walmart policy to prevent shoplifting using deadly force? Is a cart of cheap crap worth a human life?

eppur_se_muova

(36,275 posts)
24. Because cheap crap from Wal-Mart is more than worth a human life ...
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:27 AM
Feb 2017

Pull out a phone/camera next time, gun-happy dickhead.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
25. There's definately more to this story:
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:12 AM
Feb 2017
http://www.mynews13.com/content/news/cfnews13/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2017/2/4/deputies_respond_to_.html


Deputies said the vehicle the suspects used had previously been taken in a carjacking on Jan. 14.


Looks like the thieves could be bad guys beyond just this theft.

Judi Lynn

(160,588 posts)
27. You've got that right. Not by a long shot.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:01 AM
Feb 2017

Racists wishing otherwise can't change the law, no matter how much "dirt" they attempt to dig up to justify the murder, not as long as there are enough people of conscience to weigh against them.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
28. Innocent people are killed in carjacking.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:17 AM
Feb 2017

It involves threatening people and usually involves holding a weapon in their faces.

And when are people going to stop the "is not a capital offense" line? Things that happen to you while you are committing a crime are not punishments. Running a red light is not a capital offense. Smashing into a 18-wheeler because you ran a red light is a possible natural result of you breaking that law.

Coventina

(27,153 posts)
39. Thank you!!!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:27 AM
Feb 2017

Can't believe some of the crap that gets posted here sometimes.

"They were 'bad guys' who deserved it anyway."

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,027 posts)
35. Your logic fails. Citizens are not empowered to execute people for running red lights
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 08:59 AM
Feb 2017

Not for carjacking and not for shoplifting.

Especially when they choose to get involved instead of calling police.

 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
36. Enough with the false equivalences.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:05 AM
Feb 2017

Running a red light and smashing into an 18-wheeler is the natural result of breaking that law.

Getting shot while trying to carjack someone is the natural result of breaking THAT law.

Getting shot while loading shoplifted goods into a car? There's absolutely nothing natural about that.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
38. But the fact that these are violent felons
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 10:25 AM
Feb 2017

makes me more apt believe the shooter when he says he thought he saw a gun.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
42. The shooter says he thought he saw gun, which is why he open fire.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:40 AM
Feb 2017

Then, as it turned out, the car they were using was stolen in a carjacking. The logic is sound. The gun that the shooter thought he saw was probably the same one that they used in the carjacking. It's either in someone's possession, or they dumped it on the way to the hospital. But the gun does.
So no, the dead guy didn't get shot because he was shoplifting. He got shot because he pulled a weapon during the commission of a crime.

rickford66

(5,526 posts)
43. My point was no one knew about the prior carjacking etc.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:50 AM
Feb 2017

If it was known they were dangerous, the proper thing would have been to notify authorities. But, it wasn't know at the time they were dangerous. Whether the shoplifters deserved confrontation or not, more people were put in danger by the customers action.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
44. Because, and only because someone shot him.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:55 AM
Feb 2017

"He got shot because..."

...Because, and only because someone shot him.

If you are going to play the logic card, at least adhere to it yourself as well, and avoid the post hoc ergo prompter hoc fallacies.

dembotoz

(16,812 posts)
31. Do hope the shooter gets to enjoy 3hots and a cot courtesy of the state of Florida
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 08:39 AM
Feb 2017

For a number of years

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
45. This happened here too. The guy got off.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 12:29 PM
Feb 2017

Shot him as he was running away. Most people don't think theft should be a capital offense, but most seemingly think if you get shot doing it it's ok.

http://www.wvgazettemail.com/News/201109192975

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Police: Wal-Mart Customer...