Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

briv1016

(1,570 posts)
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:49 PM Feb 2017

Scott Pruitt Goes After Critics, His Own Staff In First Speech To EPA

Source: Huffington Post

Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt mentioned a “toxic environment” just once during his first address Tuesday to the embattled agency staff.

But he wasn’t talking about industry pollution or conserving nature. He was referring to his critics’ political rhetoric.

“Forgive the reference, but it’s a very toxic environment,” the controversial new administrator said in the speech, which lasted under 20 minutes.

“Civility is something I believe in very much,” he added. “We ought to be able to get together and wrestle through some issues in a civil manner.”

Then, at last, he began to outline his vision for the EPA. He described an agency that prioritized making it easier for polluters to comply with regulations. He promised to listen intently to companies before saddling them with new regulations. He admonished his new employees, some fearing layoffs amid looming budget cuts, for acting outside the agency’s legal mandate and running roughshod over states’ rights.

“Regulations ought to make things regular,” Pruitt said. “Regulations exist to give certainty to those they regulate. Those we regulate ought to know what’s expected of them so they can place and allocate resources to comply.”

He did not mention climate change or environmental destruction.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pruitt-epa-speech_us_58ac7e76e4b0c4d51057164f?ohe9p144319bpgb9&



One way or another Climate Change and the environment will resolve the human problem.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Pruitt Goes After Critics, His Own Staff In First Speech To EPA (Original Post) briv1016 Feb 2017 OP
"States rights". guillaumeb Feb 2017 #1
Well, they control a shit ton of states now flygal Feb 2017 #9
Democrats cannot be bothered to vote. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #11
That's a very scary thing, they're 2 states away from dem4decades Feb 2017 #15
"He promised to listen intently to companies" means "He will let companies write EPA regulations" dalton99a Feb 2017 #2
"Regulations exist to give certainty to those they regulate." WTF? csziggy Feb 2017 #3
"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency" handmade34 Feb 2017 #4
Friend of mine has been working for EPA for 30 Years benld74 Feb 2017 #5
State's Rights?!? Friend or Foe Feb 2017 #6
The first specific thing the Republicans have done is revoke the Stream Protection Rule muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #19
... pbmus Feb 2017 #7
You are the toxin, Pruitt. alarimer Feb 2017 #8
Rogue EPA Staff at Twitter mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2017 #10
"I want to destroy the enviroment but you better be polite." Fuck You Mr Pruitt. nt TeamPooka Feb 2017 #12
"Regulations ought to make things regular" ismnotwasm Feb 2017 #13
Regulations ought to make things regular, Solly Mack Feb 2017 #14
"He did not mention climate change or environmental destruction." Of course not. In the Repub LuckyLib Feb 2017 #16
His vision is toxic, that is why he has the job. BeckyDem Feb 2017 #17
Pruitt to EPA employees: We dont have to choose between jobs and the environment mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2017 #18
Wonder what all those emails have in them Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2017 #20
Hope the folks who didn't vote for Hillary are fucking proud of themselves... Blue_Tires Feb 2017 #21

csziggy

(34,137 posts)
3. "Regulations exist to give certainty to those they regulate." WTF?
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:56 PM
Feb 2017

The EPA was not created to give certainty to polluters - it was created to ensure that Americans have clean air, clean water and protection against being poisoned by those polluters.

Dolt45 sure went out of his way to find people whose personal agendas are directly in opposition to the agencies he put them in charge of.

handmade34

(22,757 posts)
4. "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency"
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:57 PM
Feb 2017

what part of 'Environmental Protection' does he not understand??



The mission of EPA is to protect human health and the environment.
EPA's purpose is to ensure that:
all Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and the environment where they live, learn and work;
national efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information;
federal laws protecting human health and the environment are enforced fairly and effectively;
environmental protection is an integral consideration in U.S. policies concerning natural resources, human health, economic growth, energy, transportation, agriculture, industry, and international trade, and these factors are similarly considered in establishing environmental policy;
all parts of society -- communities, individuals, businesses, and state, local and tribal governments -- have access to accurate information sufficient to effectively participate in managing human health and environmental risks;
environmental protection contributes to making our communities and ecosystems diverse, sustainable and economically productive; and
the United States plays a leadership role in working with other nations to protect the global environment.



EPA Strategic Plan
Additional Information
Cross-Agency Strategies Annual Action Plans
Prior Year Strategic Plans
Prior Year Action Plans
FY 2014-2018 Strategic Plan
The Strategic Plan charts the course for advancing EPA's priorities and mission to protect human health and the environment. 
The Plan identifies the measurable environmental and human health outcomes the public can expect over the next four years and describes how we intend to achieve those results. The Plan represents a commitment to our core values of science, transparency, and the rule of law in managing our programs.

The Plan identifies five strategic goals to guide the Agency’s work:
Goal 1: Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality
Goal 2: Protecting America’s Waters
Goal 3: Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development
Goal 4: Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and Preventing Pollution
Goal 5: Protecting Human Health and the Environment by Enforcing Laws and Assuring Compliance

The Plan also sets forth the following four cross-agency strategies which set clear expectations for changing the way EPA does business in achieving its results. 
Working Toward a Sustainable Future
Working to Make a Visible Difference in Communities
Launching a New Era of State, Tribal, Local, and International Partnerships
Embracing EPA as a High-Performing Organization
The Plan also includes EPA’s Agency Priority Goals (APGs), a component of the Administration’s performance management framework which supports improvement in near-term outcomes related to our Strategic Plan. More information on the Agency’s APGs is available at Performance.gov.

benld74

(9,909 posts)
5. Friend of mine has been working for EPA for 30 Years
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:59 PM
Feb 2017

Speaking with him he stated he had been tinkering with the idea of retirement.

When THIS individual was selected to lead the EPA

Said tinkering became a full scale march to freedom for him.


Friend or Foe

(195 posts)
6. State's Rights?!?
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:59 PM
Feb 2017

That's hogwash. Balderdash. Bovine Excrement.

What do State's rights have to do with pollution? Can one state ensure that it's polluted air and/or water respects borders and doesn't migrate into another state?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
19. The first specific thing the Republicans have done is revoke the Stream Protection Rule
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 07:13 AM
Feb 2017
Why Trump just killed a rule restricting coal companies from dumping waste in streams

With everything that Republicans want to do — repeal Obamacare, overhaul the tax code — it might seem odd that one of Congress’ very first acts would be to kill an obscure Obama-era regulation that restricts coal companies from dumping mining waste into streams and waterways.

But that is indeed what’s going on. In early February, the House and Senate voted to repeal the so-called “stream protection rule” — using a regulation-killing tool known as the Congressional Review Act. On Thursday, President Trump signed the bill, which means the stream protection rule is now dead. Coal companies will have a freer hand in dumping mining debris in streams.
...
The National Mining Association, an industry trade group, says the stream-protection rule would put more than half the nation’s untapped coal reserves off-limits to future mining — further crippling a wounded industry. The group would prefer environmental protections handled at the state level (where, in states like West Virginia and Kentucky, regulators have a much lighter touch). “It’s a pure expression of all that ordinary Americans loathe about rule by bureaucracy,” writes NMA’s Luke Popovich.

http://www.vox.com/2017/2/2/14488448/stream-protection-rule

It's a lot cheaper to buy a state legislature than the federal one.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
8. You are the toxin, Pruitt.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 04:18 PM
Feb 2017

You and your fellow asshole conservatives who think the planet is yours to despoil. Well, guess what? Climate change will kill you and your grandchildren just as much as it will kill ours.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,600 posts)
10. Rogue EPA Staff at Twitter
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 04:37 PM
Feb 2017
@RogueEPAstaff

Administrator Pruitt spoke to EPA staff today. What's IN: Federalism, process and law. OUT: focus on clean air, clean water, public health



Distressing to say the least. What to expect from Pruitt’s EPA http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/02/what-to-expect-from-pruitts-epa/ via @harvard



What to expect from Pruitt’s EPA

ismnotwasm

(42,006 posts)
13. "Regulations ought to make things regular"
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 05:22 PM
Feb 2017

He sounds like he's talking about prune juice and not the health of our planet

Solly Mack

(90,780 posts)
14. Regulations ought to make things regular,
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 05:34 PM
Feb 2017
“Regulations exist to give certainty to those they regulate. Those we regulate ought to know what’s expected of them so they can place and allocate resources to comply.”

He described an agency that prioritized making it easier for polluters to comply with regulations. He promised to listen intently to companies before saddling them with new regulations.


Translation: We're going to allow corporations/industry to do whatever they want. Dump here, dump there, dump anywhere and everywhere.


LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
16. "He did not mention climate change or environmental destruction." Of course not. In the Repub
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 07:16 PM
Feb 2017

world, what the hell do those have to do with the Environmental Protection Agency?

This makes me sick.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
20. Wonder what all those emails have in them
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 08:17 AM
Feb 2017

The ones that the Republicans in the Senate couldn't wait for before confirming him?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scott Pruitt Goes After C...