South Dakota bill leaves evolution skepticism up to teachers
Source: Associated Press
James Nord and Hannah Weikel, Associated Press Updated 4:12 pm, Tuesday, February 21, 2017
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) South Dakota legislators are weighing whether to let teachers decide how much skepticism to work into lessons on contentious scientific topics such as evolution and climate change.
A House committee on Wednesday is set to consider the measure, which would give legal protection to teachers who want to discuss "in an objective scientific manner the strengths and weaknesses" of the subjects.
South Dakota is one of at least three states, along with Texas and Oklahoma, considering such a bill. Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee have enacted similar laws, according to Glenn Branch, deputy director of the California-based National Center for Science Education, which opposes the proposal.
Branch said there are concerns that such a bill would embolden some teachers to start presenting creationism in their classrooms.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/education/article/South-Dakota-bill-leaves-evolution-skepticism-up-10948878.php
[center]
Sen. Jeff Monroe
Matthew28
(1,798 posts)and religious bs is the goal of the republican party. We're going down the same path as Turkey at this very moment but with Christianity.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Any other discussion is motivated by politics/money or religion.
sakabatou
(42,174 posts)billh58
(6,635 posts)but this time the devolved descendants of the anti-science movement are confronting a highly evolved scientific community. They will lose even more bigly this time.
frogmarch
(12,158 posts)Our family lived in SD in the 80s when the kids were in school. The high school biology teacher told his students to staple shut all the pages in the textbook dealing with evolution. I complained to the school board, but they shrugged it off. The only consolation was knowing that the kids probably read the forbidden pages before stapling them shut. My kids didn't do any stapling. The teacher called them troublemakers for refusing to obey him, but they did well grade-wise in other classes and our daughter graduated valedictorian.
paleotn
(17,947 posts)We really are in Dumbfuckistan.
Luciferous
(6,085 posts)evolution. We've only been here for a year and are still amazed by the stupidity of many of the people that live in this area.
Solly Mack
(90,780 posts)brooklynite
(94,725 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)christain jihadists & ISIL, same, same.
kimbutgar
(21,185 posts)The rethugs are real knuckle draggers. They want to take us back to the 19th century!!!!
Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)There is no objective scientific evidence for creationism or intelligent design. None whatsoever.
BigDemVoter
(4,156 posts)Let's leave it up to each individual teacher's fucking religious beliefs. . . He/she doesn't believe in evolution because "Jayzus said so!" That means the poor kids assigned to this dumb ass won't have the benefit of learning ANYTHING.
Tikki
(14,559 posts)So the parents and child can discuss and either opt out or opt in that class.
Tikki
briv1016
(1,570 posts)then students/parents should be able to "opt out" of a specific teacher. When they are unable to get enough students to fill a class for a given teacher then they should be fired.
LakeArenal
(28,844 posts)Is a sure fire way of knowing which teachers they need to release. One honest teacher shares their science based view, administrators have their target....
hunter
(38,326 posts)... and credit for their classes disallowed for college admissions. Sorry kids, you'll have to take remedial classes.
Ah fuck it. Maybe it's time for Trump U.S.A. to die in a putrid puddle of self-inflicted ignorance.