Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 10:31 AM Mar 2017

'It Simply Was Not There': Conway Dismisses Russian Collusion Allegations After Comey Hearing

Source: Mediaite



by Ken Meyer | 10:11 am, March 21st, 2017




Kellyanne Conway responded to yesterday’s testimony from FBI director James Comey, telling Fox & Friends the Congressional hearing produced no signs of collusion between President Trump and Russia.

“If you listen to the Democrats and many of their friends,” Conway said, “they insist that this collusion and its effect on the election — it simply was not there.”

Conway suggested that Russia’s alleged meddling was effectively debunked after Comey and NSA Director Michael Rogers revealed that there was no evidence vote tallies in the 2016 race had been tampered with. Conway also argued that the most troubling issue the House Intelligence Committee faced were leaks, like those which led to Michael Flynn’s dismissal as National Security Advisor.

At yesterday’s hearing, Director Comey said the FBI had been investigating potential Trump collusion with Russia since July of last year.

Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/online/it-simply-was-not-there-conway-dismisses-russian-collusion-allegations-after-comey-hearing/
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
3. Big difference between fact and fiction.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 10:45 AM
Mar 2017

Accusation of Obama "wiretapping" that jackasses' tower: "No such evidence" and "Not even possible."

Collusion between campaign and Russia: "We're investigating."

How can Propaganda Minister Con Way get this backwards?

Simple!

Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie!

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
4. Oh, but Kellyanne, Dear...
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 10:45 AM
Mar 2017

If you watched the FULL hearing instead of just the little, tiny, bitsy snippet that you reference, you would see that it WAS THERE!

Is orange in your color pallet, sweetie????

BumRushDaShow

(129,053 posts)
7. "'It Simply Was Not There'" - But we will always remember what
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 11:07 AM
Mar 2017

was not there but was there only because you said so!




Yavin4

(35,440 posts)
10. Did you all see that?!?!?! She just moved the lie forward a little.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 01:06 PM
Mar 2017
“If you listen to the Democrats and many of their friends,” Conway said, “they insist that this collusion and its effect on the election — it simply was not there.”


Okay, she moved off from the lie, "there was no collusion" to it didn't have an "effect on the election".

calimary

(81,295 posts)
12. This one's easy. If she says there's nothing to it,
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:03 PM
Mar 2017

then you KNOW there's a LOT to it!

Whatever she says, believe the opposite.

Simple and effective litmus test!

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
14. Well, if Kellyanne says it, I'm reassured, because when has she ever gotten anything wrong?
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 02:29 PM
Mar 2017

All you survivors in Bowling Green just shut up!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'It Simply Was Not There'...