Energy Department climate office bans use of phrase climate change
Source: Politico
A supervisor at the Energy Department's international climate office told staff this week not to use the phrases "climate change," "emissions reduction" or "Paris Agreement" in written memos, briefings or other written communication, sources have told POLITICO.
Employees of DOEs Office of International Climate and Clean Energy learned of the ban at a meeting Tuesday, the same day President Donald Trump signed an executive order at EPA headquarters to reverse most of former President Barack Obama's climate regulatory initiatives. Officials at the State Department and in other DOE offices said they had not been given a banned words list, but they had started avoiding climate-related terms in their memos and briefings given the new administration's direction on climate change.
The Office of International Climate and Clean Energy is the only office at DOE with the words "climate" in its name, and it may be endangered as Trump looks to reorganize government agencies. It plays a key role in U.S. participation in the Clean Energy Ministerial and Mission Innovation, two international efforts launched under Obama that were designed to advance clean energy technology.
The office has regular contact with officials from foreign countries, which may have led to the more aggressive action on language than in other offices, a source said. At the meeting, senior officials told staff the words would cause a "visceral reaction" with Energy Secretary Rick Perry, his immediate staff, and the cadre of White House advisers at the top of the department
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/energy-department-climate-change-phrases-banned-236655
How about "alternative weather"?
Binders Keepers
(369 posts)for "global warming." What's the new perferred euphemism: "meteorological variation"?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The original concern was global warming, but as scientific understanding grew, the issue went beyond increases in temperature. Anthropogenic climate change can sometimes cause colder weather in particular areas, as when melting Arctic ice shifts the polar vortex south. There are also climatic effects beyond temperature.
I thought that it was environmentalists who were the primary movers in substituting "climate change" for the previous "global warming".
Binders Keepers
(369 posts)But my memory may be faulty.
canetoad
(17,167 posts)The term "global warming," which describes an increase in the Earth's average temperature surface due to greenhouse gas emissions, is widely believed to have been coined in 1975 by Columbia University geochemist Wallace Broecker, according to NASA. Meanwhile, "climate change," which describes a long-term change in the Earth's climate, appeared a few years later in a 1979 National Academy of Science study on carbon dioxide.
A May 2014 Yale University study found that while "climate change" appears to be preferred by scientists, "global warming" can evoke stronger emotions and issue engagement for some groups of people.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The NPR ombudsman was asked about the use of the two terms in NPR's programming, and produced this comprehensive answer. Your memory is confirmed to the extent that Republican pollster Frank Luntz did at one time favor "climate change" as sounding more benign. Later, however, he said that the public reacted equally to that and to "global warming". (It's interesting that the Yale study cited by canetoad in #14 seems to confirm Luntz's original view.)
On my side of the question, the NPR piece states:
I know an activist who went from saying "global warming" to "climate change" but has now moved on to "global climate crisis", which I hope gives Frank Luntz the cold sweats.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)"Stuff going on outdoors", "waste rationing", and "that thing in the French capital".
Javaman
(62,530 posts)Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)Let's see how that works out.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)malthaussen
(17,200 posts)Freethinker65
(10,023 posts)How childish.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Hopefully the people will be smarter than that fucking dumbass Rick Perry. You think?
jpak
(41,758 posts)Fascist bullshit.
yup