Conservative Radio Host Hugh Hewitt May Be Getting a Show on MSNBC
Source: Mediaite
Today MSNBC announced that Nicolle Wallaceformer McCain-Palin 08 senior advisor and current NBC News political analystwill be hosting a new 4 pm weekday show on the network. And now it appears conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt may be next up for a hosting position.
Hewitt, an MSNBC political analyst, has not only appeared on the network for a while now, but he has made appearances on Meet the Press panels in the last few months. Yashar Ali reports for New York Magazine that the liberal network is in talks with Hewitt for a program that would air on weekend evenings.
Wallaces 4 pm program and Hewitts reported show will be in addition to Morning JoeJoe Scarborough being a former Republican congressmanand Greta Van Susterenformerly of Fox Newsin providing analysis that wont exactly win over all of MSNBCs liberal audience. And yes, if youre wondering, the New York Magazine report does contain behind-the-scenes information about how some at the network have been apparently taking these changes:
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-radio-host-hugh-hewitt-may-be-getting-a-show-on-msnbc/
I'm speechless
skylucy
(3,740 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,835 posts)bathroommonkey76
(3,827 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Just maybe, IF msnbc is able to get some O'Reilly viewers, they will be exposed to a more moderate version of Republicanism. This would be helpful in getting some of them to cross the line, and the rest of them not to be rabidly anti-liberal.
Morning Joe, while a Republican and certainly partisan in some respects, is pretty balanced, and he's not a far righter.
I'm thinking that since MJ went over so well (it's the #2 morning program), MSNBC is expanding into having more major moderate programs to counter the progressive ones. NBC hired that Fox broadcaster that Trump went after, Megan Kelly, from Fox, to host in a morning show.
If Fox's ratings can be chipped away, that's a good thing. As long as MSNBC leaves its progressive programs in place.
thegoose
(3,115 posts)NBC isn't being altruistic. They're swooping in to take over when Fox collapses, if it does.
PatSeg
(47,585 posts)But Hewitt has the personality of a damp dish rag. I have no problem with Wallace, she comes across as sane and reasonable, but Hewitt is smug and unlikable in every respect.
BigDemVoter
(4,156 posts)I am so fucking tired of this false "balance" between people who are utterly wrong and the rest of us. It is like treating the flat earthers the same as the rest. . . Total bullshit.
JHB
(37,161 posts)He's on it enough that clearly someone who signs checks there loves him.
rurallib
(62,448 posts)for the new talent.
Maybe move Hayes back to weekend mornings, Maddow to early afternoon.
Didn't we see this once before with Schultz and Sharpton?
7962
(11,841 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Her show is nothing like theirs and her ratings are probably triple what either of them had on their best days
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Same with Keith (I know, I know - he had other problems but he gave that network a huge boost in ratings during the Bush years)
rurallib
(62,448 posts)Schultz kept walking in verboten territory by backing labor. Rachel may be doing the same with the Russia connection. Note that no one even mentions net neutrality anymore - look at the ownership at MSNBC.
MSNBC has a history of dumping decent to good rated left wing shows in favor of less -um- abrasive hosts.
Anyone who thinks they care about ratings OR especially cares about presenting both sides may have missed some history. Unless Rachel knows where some bodies are buried she could easily suffer the same fate as Donohue, Olbermann (I know, he quit) and Schultz.
And what will we do? Send nasty emails and shake our fists at the sky?
My informal survey of "liberal" media in this country turns up Freespeech tv, a few radio stations (WCPT in Chicago and KTNF in the twin cities - there is probably more I can't hear), a couple of spots on Sirius radio and a couple of magazines like Mother Jones and the Nation.
That is about it AFAIK. Movement conservative went on a media buying spree starting in the 197os following the Powell memo. They own 95+% of media. It is like a black hole, light can't emerge from it.
Back to MSNBC - Comcast owns it and they won't allow a few loose lips to sink their ship.
One other note - NPR - I seldom listen anymore. Right wing talking points are put out and seldom disputed on NPR. Guess that is fair and balanced.
cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)WBAI 99.5 FM New York City
KPFA 94.1 FM Berkeley, California
KPFB 1 89.3 FM Berkeley, California
KPFK 90.7 FM Los Angeles
KPFT 90.1 FM Houston, Texas
WPFW 89.3 FM Washington, D.C.
Pacifica Foundation is an American non-profit organization which owns five independently operated, non-commercial, listener-supported radio stations known for their progressive/liberal[1][2] political orientation. Its national headquarters adjoins station KPFA in Berkley, California.
Pacifica Foundation also operates the Pacifica Network, a program service supplying over 180 affiliated stations with various programs, primarily news and public affairs.[citation needed] It was the first public radio network in the United States and it is the world's oldest listener-funded radio network.[3] Programs such as Democracy Now! and Free Speech Radio News have been some of its most popular productions.[citation needed]
The Pacifica Radio Archives, housed at station KPFK in Los Angeles, is the oldest public radio archive in the United States,[citation needed] documenting more than five decades of grassroots political, cultural, and performing arts history. The archive includes original recordings of interviews with John Coltrane, James Baldwin, Lorraine Hansberry, and Langston Hughes, among many others.
The Pacifica Radio Archives feature in their own 30-minute slot on BBC Radio 5 Live's Up All Night programme, at 3:30 am UK time on Mondays.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifica_Foundation
rurallib
(62,448 posts)Thanks so much for the reminder. They have been incredible over the years.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)That will free up 2 hours a night to watch Ice Road Truckers and other good stuff.
C_U_L8R
(45,020 posts)Who knew?
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)because that's where the money is.
lutefisk
(3,974 posts)progressoid
(49,998 posts)radical noodle
(8,013 posts)It isn't bad enough that no one will watch Greta, now Hugh? Another one I will not watch.
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)kimbutgar
(21,186 posts)Maybe a little Joy or Rachel and this is the reason why I no longer watch MSNBC as much anymore.
George II
(67,782 posts)MarinCoUSA
(891 posts)This douche bag is pure Gish Gush right wing hate porn radio BS. He is a risible ass when ever he opens his mouth. A show with him as host would be funny if they had a Jerry Springer chair throwing crazy on.
BTW is the useless Gretta still in the routine? No way in hell this pathetic creature will last any time, me thinks.
LonePirate
(13,431 posts)Maddow is enjoying record ratings and MSNBC thinks the wise business decision is to hire a bunch of right wing hacks?
I truly do not understand the world any more.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Another way is to get dark money from very rich people pushing propaganda.
BumRushDaShow
(129,430 posts)They are not a "liberal network". They have been systematically getting rid of liberals/progressives and/or relegating them to weekend slots and filling slots with RW loons. I wouldn't be surprised if eventually they get the cajones to bring O'Reilly on and call it a "coup!!1!!!".
Deb
(3,742 posts)what are they thinking?
kydo
(2,679 posts)Voltaire2
(13,153 posts)It's about time.
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)If it's the latter, Welcome To DU and hope you enjoy your SHORT stay....
bucolic_frolic
(43,280 posts)Maybe a few will open their minds?
totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)It is now one of the top rated programs in all of cable. So if MSNBC wishes to improve ratings, bring in more people like Rachel, not the other way around.
thegoose
(3,115 posts)And his interests are ghoulish. First he hated the Dump and then he started deep throating the tiny Cheeto. Put him on a show with Greta Van Horrorface for maximum hideousness and drive your viewers away...
moonscape
(4,673 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)underpants
(182,877 posts)I mean is he actually human?
doc03
(35,363 posts)the shows I will never watch.
Paladin
(28,272 posts)What nauseating news.
earthshine
(1,642 posts)Their primary motivation is not profits with MSNBC. It's to get their business-oriented, conservative messages out, as well as to suppress messages about progressive causes.
So, for example, have there been any recent comprehensive discussions of net neutrality?
Without a progressive-oriented MSNBC, we liberals have lost one of the very valuable information resources that pulls us together.
certainot
(9,090 posts)he may be smart but he argues from the alternate reality these motherfuckers have used to destroy the country
the red herrings and straw and "political correctness" bullshit will fly
FUCK YOU MSNBC
emulatorloo
(44,180 posts)Doubt this is true.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)They are turning our channel into a conservative piece of crap. What are they going to do next? Get rid of Rachel? Yeah, I realize they would not do that but it makes just as much sense.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)rethugs stinko! We should demand Joy Reid!
DownriverDem
(6,231 posts)With so many left leaning talkers like Bill Press, Stephanie Miller, Norman Goldman and Randi Rhodes I don't get why they are doing it. Why?
I still like Rachel Maddow. She is really working hard on the trump/Russia connection. She's on now.
TeamPooka
(24,254 posts)and Wallace gets the key lead in to MTP Daily which is really the last slot that begins the night time brand/personality based show line up.
napi21
(45,806 posts)cubbies01
(85 posts)I actually like Nicolle Wallace. Hewitt is a pratt.
lostnfound
(16,189 posts)I might need to cancel cable, at this rate.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Must-watch video:
http://www.vox.com/videos/2017/4/17/15325172/strikethrough-cnn-espn-trump-surrogates
Explains why CNN and MSNBC make money from GOP crazy controversy
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Joe Bacon
(5,165 posts)That's why I got rid of my cable box. I did keep Sirius so I can listen to CBC, the BBC and France 24.
calimary
(81,454 posts)I don't bother with Greta much, either. Her voice is worse than Sarah Palin's!
riversedge
(70,299 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Friday, that there's talk of a new righter-wing TV channel because right wingers think Fox isn't right wing enough for them. So MSNBC going right isn't surprising. They ain't Liberal, they just have three weekday prime time hours of truthful information, plus AM Joy on weekend mornings.
Judi Lynn
(160,611 posts)Hugh is nothing but trash. No one sane or literate could stand to listen to him.
Nicole Wallace, too.
What a bitter shame conservative owners finally got total control of NBC. I would rather they go broke altogether than to add one more scumball to their programming.
Here's hoping time will show Comcast they were wildly out of step with the US public. Soon.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)Might watch 'em now!
Get Off Of My Cloud
(22 posts)On her 1st show for the network
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/megyn-kelly-nbc-morning-show-kardashians-1202403118/
Can't wait
It's all worthless trash
All of it
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)S**T like this is why we stopped watching MS-Full Of BS During The 2016 Election. Folks that are still watching that channel are engaging in a baffling amount of cognitive dissonance.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)If this boots Kornacki, ok by me. Wallace is conservative, but at least she doesn't seem crazy.
All MSNBC runs on weekend nights is prison shows. I can't imagine Hewitt getting many more viewers than those shows do. I'd bet dollars to donuts he's got Ailes/O'Reilly like issues somewhere in his past.
OnDoutside
(19,969 posts)Hewitt is a definite sleaze, maybe not in the Reilly mould but something just as dodgy.
Wallace I do like, I'd prefer her to Greta any day of the week .....
whistler162
(11,155 posts)conservative hour?
LakeArenal
(28,844 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,795 posts)WoonTars
(694 posts)WTF???
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)MSNBC isn't some beacon of righteousness...they are just there to make money after all. They could give a shit about journalistic integrity or any of that shit. They have none.
Any impressions of that are solely for ratings and profit. They are a for-profit, commercial cable entertainment channel. Their goal is increasing value for the stockholders, keeping the system of corporate power in place. Best to keep the majority of the population arguing amongst ourselves rather than realizing we actually have more in common and could unite to incite real social and political change.
Corporate control is the elephant in the room but we are distracted and encouraged to fight each other over petty bullshit and lies. Thus they have succeeded so far.
Not that this should be a big shock to anyone.
Just sayin'.
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)Then we can replace him.
Baby steps.
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)Scruffy1
(3,256 posts)maxrandb
(15,350 posts)Is through their wallets!
We've tried facts and they've given us "some say" horseshit
We've tried reason and they've given us 18 months of "an empty fucking podium" with "Breaking News" flashing on the teletype as they wait for the next fart from the shitgibbons piehole.
We've tried voting and they've given us "why are the Democrats out of touch" RNC Talking Points.
Boycott their fucking advertisers everywhere!
Shut their shit off everywhere!
Let them see if there are enough Gold selling scam artist and life lock shit to pay their salaries
katmondoo
(6,457 posts)I am down to Rachel and Lawrence O'Donnell