Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:19 AM May 2017

Saudis pump $200bn into rust belt

Source: The Times of London



Trump arrives in Riyadh at start of first major foreign trip

Richard Spencer, Riyadh
May 20 2017, 12:00pm,
The Times

Saudi Arabia is offering President Trump investment in America’s decaying infrastructure and industry worth tens of billions of dollars as a sweetener for arms deals and better relations between the two countries.

Mohammed bin Salman, the deputy crown prince and in effect the prime minister, made the offer during a visit to Washington this year, sources said. Mr Trump is hoping that the money will be invested in the “rust belt” states whose support helped to propel him to the White House.

Estimates of the sums involved range from $40 billion to $200 billion — in addition to current and future arms deals valued at $300 billion, which will be announced during Mr Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia, which began today.

The president touched down in Riyadh this morning, exiting Air Force One onto the red carpet with his wife Melania to be met by King Salman.

Read more: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/saudis-pump-200bn-into-rust-belt-in-new-american-alliance-ms2zjltbl

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Saudis pump $200bn into rust belt (Original Post) DonViejo May 2017 OP
Privatization scheme? $400 Billion in exchange for what? bucolic_frolic May 2017 #1
It sounds more like a headline created by the Saudis to make King Con look good sandensea May 2017 #37
Fuck this. theaocp May 2017 #2
Generally speaking, yes. International investment is Hortensis May 2017 #44
The Saudi Arabia Rust Belt Investment Fund BeyondGeography May 2017 #3
SARBIF! jmowreader May 2017 #34
so what is trump going to sell to the arabs? beachbum bob May 2017 #4
In the first paragraph of the article... DonViejo May 2017 #7
arabs don't give away their money.... beachbum bob May 2017 #11
"Investment" in "infrastructure" doesn't sound promising. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #31
And? I found profits flowing to it from Chicago parking meters, Hortensis May 2017 #45
Ha! Check this out BumRushDaShow May 2017 #13
I guess this is going to be spun to the Trumpsters logosoco May 2017 #5
I hate to say it but... thesquanderer May 2017 #6
And this will happen how? I don't believe a word of it. yardwork May 2017 #8
The Saudi investment will be administered by the Trump Foundation - of course. Marcuse May 2017 #25
so, trumpy will then write a check to himself. dah. riversedge May 2017 #27
I suspect we will see a surge in oil prices as a part of all this as it benefits both beachbum bob May 2017 #12
Of course TexasBushwhacker May 2017 #33
I suspect there will be very little of it for "the U.S. public good"... JHB May 2017 #26
Yep. We were just handed the gift of "surge pricing" in my Chicago neighborhood. Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #32
Uhh. It will be the corporations and their CEO 's madinmaryland May 2017 #29
They're buying the rights to build Lockheed products in Saudi. haele May 2017 #39
Hell, the Saudis, Inc. already own a huge chunk of Fox "news" Achilleaze May 2017 #9
A public service/campaign ad WellDarn May 2017 #10
US is now a third world country in some ways; at least some parts. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #14
Selling off bit of America to the Saudis? Adrahil May 2017 #15
Investors always want a return on their money. Phoenix61 May 2017 #16
"Is arming them to the teeth really the best plan?" EX500rider May 2017 #21
Good point. Have the Saudis ever apologized for their madinmaryland May 2017 #30
Wonder how this will sit with the Rust belt folk? packman May 2017 #17
I'm not sure they'll even get jobs out of this. -nt Bradical79 May 2017 #41
Wonder how the Rubes will like all those Moos-lambs will feel DK504 May 2017 #18
Disgusting -as usual. vkkv May 2017 #19
Just say NO to foreign royalty jpak May 2017 #20
Now that would be some crazy Egnever May 2017 #22
Isn't that the truth, "Deplorable's get bail out from 1%'r Muslims". harun May 2017 #23
'Mr Trump is hoping that the money will be invested in the rust belt states elleng May 2017 #24
The Saudis are buying Kansas? no_hypocrisy May 2017 #28
Trump just aold his base orangecrush May 2017 #35
it's going to go towards right wing talk radio JI7 May 2017 #36
If this is done right... qwlauren35 May 2017 #38
Foreign investments in U.S. infrastructure has very rarely gone well. haele May 2017 #42
Once upon a time, my PA Gov. Rendell sought to lease our highways to Spain WinkyDink May 2017 #47
Thank you for the eye opener. qwlauren35 May 2017 #48
They bought the rust belt. Demtexan May 2017 #40
The headline said they pumped. The body said they offered to pump Goprox May 2017 #43
The term in the article is "Mr. Trump is hoping that......." Selling us to the Saudis. 9/11 what? WinkyDink May 2017 #46

bucolic_frolic

(43,166 posts)
1. Privatization scheme? $400 Billion in exchange for what?
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:22 AM
May 2017

We are being financially enslaved by this Airhead

sandensea

(21,635 posts)
37. It sounds more like a headline created by the Saudis to make King Con look good
Sat May 20, 2017, 11:39 PM
May 2017

And yes: whatever investment does come out of this (if any) is likely to be of the predatory type you described above, and come with yooge strings attached.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
44. Generally speaking, yes. International investment is
Tue May 23, 2017, 03:07 AM
May 2017

common, but I'm wondering how right wing media would spin this? Bury? They could hardly brag about this "great victory" to a xenophobic base, after all. But Rump might well.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
7. In the first paragraph of the article...
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:53 AM
May 2017

Saudi Arabia is offering President Trump investment in America’s decaying infrastructure and industry worth tens of billions of dollars as a sweetener for arms deals and better relations between the two countries.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
31. "Investment" in "infrastructure" doesn't sound promising.
Sat May 20, 2017, 07:53 PM
May 2017

I'm in Chicago. We deal with the Abu Dubai Sovereign Wealth Fund (and other hedge funds) investment in our infrastructure every day.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
45. And? I found profits flowing to it from Chicago parking meters,
Tue May 23, 2017, 03:41 AM
May 2017

which doesn't sound good. Infrastructure investment has a good sound, though...? Has there been benefit accruing to Chicago, or just exploitation with money flowing out?

BumRushDaShow

(129,025 posts)
13. Ha! Check this out
Sat May 20, 2017, 09:47 AM
May 2017

(article from a little over a year ago)

<...>

“IPOing Aramco and transferring its shares to PIF (the Public Investment Fund) will technically make investments the source of Saudi government revenue, not oil,” the prince said in a five-hour interview this week at the royal compound in Riyadh. “What is left now is to diversify investments. So within 20 years, we will be an economy or state that doesn’t depend mainly on oil.”

Largest U.S. refinery now belongs to Saudi Arabia

In addition to being the kingdom's Defense Minister and second in line to the throne, the prince oversees the Council for Economic and Development Affairs, which controls the Public Investment Fund. The fund currently hold stakes in Saudi Basic Industries Corp., the world’s second-biggest chemicals manufacturer, and National Commercial Bank, the kingdom’s largest lender.The fund is expected to grow to more than $2 trillion and will increase its foreign investments from about 5% now to 50% by 2020.

Back in July, the kingdom's fund spent $10 billion to invest in the Russian Direct Investment Fund and $1.1 billion to acquire a 38% stake in South Korea’s Posco Engineering & Construction Co.

This move and a planned “National Transformation Plan” aimed at increasing non-oil revenue to be announced within a month, come amid a global rash in oil prices. “We are working on increasing the efficiency of spending,” Prince Mohammed said. “So I don’t believe that we have a real problem when it comes to low oil prices.”


http://www.freep.com/story/money/2016/04/01/report-saudi-arabia-plans-aramco-ipo/82508522/

Some recent info here: http://www.clickondetroit.com/money/dealmaker-trump-will-be-busy-in-saudi-arabia

Edit to note - If Saudi follows through with getting out of the oil business (which is what is suggested here), then Russia and the U.S. can step in to fill that gap --Because.China.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
5. I guess this is going to be spun to the Trumpsters
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:34 AM
May 2017

as a great "win". I wonder when they will figure out this most likely means toll roads and the money won't be going to the state DOT.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
6. I hate to say it but...
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:49 AM
May 2017

...if the Saudis are willing to pay higher prices for American arms, there is something to be said for that extra money going to the U.S. public good, rather than into the pockets of the likes of Lockheed's executives and their shareholders.

yardwork

(61,621 posts)
8. And this will happen how? I don't believe a word of it.
Sat May 20, 2017, 09:03 AM
May 2017

What is the mechanism for "investing in the rust belt?"

Let's see if that happens.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
12. I suspect we will see a surge in oil prices as a part of all this as it benefits both
Sat May 20, 2017, 09:43 AM
May 2017

the Saudis and the Russians....a win-win for Putin for sure

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
33. Of course
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:05 PM
May 2017

Good luck to the Republicans trying to spin that as a positive while we have to pay more at the pump and the grocery store.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
26. I suspect there will be very little of it for "the U.S. public good"...
Sat May 20, 2017, 04:25 PM
May 2017

...and see privatization schemes like the Chicago parking meter fiasco as much more likely.

Chicago’s ill-fated 75-year lease of the city’s 36,000 parking meters for $1 billion to a Morgan Stanley-led private consortium is Exhibit A for bad public contracting. After the ink was dry, the city’s inspector general concluded that the city sold the meters $1 billion dollars under their value. Parking rates skyrocketed, and the terms of the lease protecting Morgan Stanley’s investment created new annual costs for the city.

***

So that private investors can protect their money, P3 contracts typically specify “compensation events” or financial penalties that the city must pay the private investor if certain events occur that may adversely threaten profits. In the case of Chicago’s parking meters, the most significant compensation event occurs when the city has to remove a parking meter from the system for such things like road construction, street festivals or implementing new street level transit modes. The city lost a lawsuit filed by Morgan Stanley for $61 million in compensation penalties for street closures.

***

The Chicago deal isn’t the only contract that has clauses working against sustainability goals. A P3 that created HOV lanes on the Washington Beltway in Northern Virginia forces taxpayers to reimburse the investment consortium (comprised of Australia-based Transurban and Texas’ Fluor Corporation) when “too many” commuters carpool.


https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/infrastructure-projects-p3-contracts-chicago-parking

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
32. Yep. We were just handed the gift of "surge pricing" in my Chicago neighborhood.
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:04 PM
May 2017

The doubling of the already 500% increase in parking rates goes to, you guessed it, the hedge fund parking meter company to help pay back the charge backs the city owes for meter closures.

It's like we were turned over to the juice loan collectors in a mob bust out.

Water main break? Fuck you, pay me.

Natural disaster? Fuck you, pay me.

Street fair? Fuck you, pay me.

Btw, Mayor Daley landed him on of those no show consulting gigs with the law firm that handled the deal.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
29. Uhh. It will be the corporations and their CEO 's
Sat May 20, 2017, 07:19 PM
May 2017

That will reap the benefits. They'll just outsource the work to third world countries.

haele

(12,657 posts)
39. They're buying the rights to build Lockheed products in Saudi.
Mon May 22, 2017, 04:08 PM
May 2017

Word in the DoD contractor community is already that all manufacturing for the Saudi purchase will be overseas. We knew that a few years ago when Pres. Obama's administration nixed the deal on humanitarian reasons.

I'll be surprised if 5% of that money will end up taxable revenue in the U.S. Most of whatever might touch U.S. soil will be in the form of some administrative costs and executive pay.

Haele

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
9. Hell, the Saudis, Inc. already own a huge chunk of Fox "news"
Sat May 20, 2017, 09:06 AM
May 2017

republicans willing to do anything to make moneybucks.

 

WellDarn

(255 posts)
10. A public service/campaign ad
Sat May 20, 2017, 09:33 AM
May 2017

Just popped into my head

"The Twin Towers burning . . . people jumping . . . video of Trump shaking hand with the Saudi rulers . . . fade to black . . . All caps 'BLOOD MONEY'" in white . . . end.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
15. Selling off bit of America to the Saudis?
Sat May 20, 2017, 10:38 AM
May 2017

Well, I guess they know oil will no longer be a weapon soon enough, they need to find something else.

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
16. Investors always want a return on their money.
Sat May 20, 2017, 10:52 AM
May 2017

Not to dredge up ancient history but 15 of the 9/11 pilots were from Saudi Arabia. Is arming them to the teeth really the best plan?

EX500rider

(10,848 posts)
21. "Is arming them to the teeth really the best plan?"
Sat May 20, 2017, 01:10 PM
May 2017

Not really up to us, they can buy weapons from Russia, China, France, Germany...etc....

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
30. Good point. Have the Saudis ever apologized for their
Sat May 20, 2017, 07:23 PM
May 2017

Country playing a pivotal role in the 9/11 attack.

Crickets.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
17. Wonder how this will sit with the Rust belt folk?
Sat May 20, 2017, 11:16 AM
May 2017

Taking a job from an Ahrab? I can see a lot of conflicted folk twisting themselves into knots about this.

DK504

(3,847 posts)
18. Wonder how the Rubes will like all those Moos-lambs will feel
Sat May 20, 2017, 11:42 AM
May 2017

about a takeover of their states. I'm sure they will think they are going to blow up all the houses.

Lookie, we're showing the world we refuse to take care of our own problems, despite the fact we could rebuild the world if we just taxed corporations and the 1%.

Wonder how much we could rebuild if it weren't for "The Wall."

elleng

(130,913 posts)
24. 'Mr Trump is hoping that the money will be invested in the rust belt states
Sat May 20, 2017, 04:11 PM
May 2017

whose support helped to propel him to the White House.'


I 'hope' too.

'As President Trump begins his first presidential trip abroad in Saudi Arabia, an investment company run by one of his top supporters, the billionaire Stephen A. Schwarzman, has secured an enormous investment from the Middle Eastern kingdom.

The company, Blackstone, which Mr. Schwarzman helped found, said on Saturday that Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund had committed $20 billion to a new investment fund aimed at infrastructure projects, primarily in the United States.

The commitment is about half of the capital Blackstone plans to raise for the fund. All told, including potential borrowed money, the new fund could invest more than $100 billion in infrastructure projects, the company said in its statement.

The fund was one of several business deals between an American company and Saudi Arabia announced after Mr. Trump’s arrival. At a ceremony in Riyadh on Saturday, General Electric said it had agreements for $15 billion worth of projects.

And the Trump administration helped line up $110 billion worth of arms deals, negotiations in which senior officials played prominent roles. For instance, Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, personally called the chief executive of Lockheed Martin to cut the price of a radar system.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/business/dealbook/saudi-arabia-to-invest-20-billion-in-infrastructure-mostly-in-us.httml?

orangecrush

(19,558 posts)
35. Trump just aold his base
Sat May 20, 2017, 08:14 PM
May 2017

To the Saudi Royalty!!!






And I thought the orange turd had no sense of humor....

qwlauren35

(6,148 posts)
38. If this is done right...
Sun May 21, 2017, 06:13 PM
May 2017

it could go into roads, bridges, electric utilities. It could go into building public schools, putting up health clinics. There are major possibilities. These are the jobs that Trump promised. And if he delivers, it will be a major coup, because the US government doesn't have to pay for it.

This has the possibility of a win-win-win. A win for Trump in public approval from his base, a win for Saudi Arabia in a massive arms deal, and a win for the American people in the Rust Belt.

I see it happening, I see his base loving him for it, and I see the Democrats losing their ability to win a coup in 2018.

haele

(12,657 posts)
42. Foreign investments in U.S. infrastructure has very rarely gone well.
Mon May 22, 2017, 05:01 PM
May 2017

Despite the claims of a high-paying jobs and better communities, after the initial honeymoon period in the push to establish the ownership, most foreign investment ownership results in a majority of unprotected lower wage jobs with few benefits, high use fees, problems with maintaining the infrastructure.
What's especially troubling is that there's very little legal recourse when there's a conflict with local regulations, health, or safety issues are the norm when foreign entities "invest" in local U.S. infrastructure - in fact, in most cases I've read about, it's worse than local privatization.

https://www.thetruckersreport.com/foreign-company-now-owns-six-major-us-tolls-roads/
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/terrihall/2013/10/first-foreign-owned-toll-road-in-texas-downgraded-to-junk-bond-status/
http://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/11/18/the-indiana-toll-road-and-the-dark-side-of-privately-financed-highways/

And this is not just a problem with foreign takeover of public infrastructure. This happens with privatization all the time.
The problem stems from Infrastructure as an "Investment", not Infrastructure as a taxpayer service project. There is no "long term" community pride or reputation here. It's all about the return.
The private investors - both the Saudis and the Global corporations are only putting up the money because they expect they're going to be getting back all that money to "build something" - and significantly more. And it doesn't matter what the locals or U.S. taxpayers actually need. It's not about improving the lives of American citizens.
It's about how much money the investors can make off all these desperate and irrational "heathens" who have no say in the foreign government or corporate organizations by taking their public resources and selling it back to them in a captive market. All the investors have to do is make the state governments happy enough to continue to let them operate with the least amount of regulation and restrictions.

The locals will still have no other option but to use what these privateers offer them, unless they can afford to live off the grid and don't travel by public roads.

https://hbr.org/1995/09/is-foreign-infrastructure-investment-still-risky

But of course, you can't point that out to the shallow get rich quick types and people who will vote against their own best interests because of emails or a provincial GGG mindset who can get distracted by the last shiny to be dangled in front of them.

Haele

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
47. Once upon a time, my PA Gov. Rendell sought to lease our highways to Spain
Tue May 23, 2017, 04:04 AM
May 2017

for 99 years.

The populace raised its collective voice and made Big Ed fuhgeddaboutit.

qwlauren35

(6,148 posts)
48. Thank you for the eye opener.
Tue May 23, 2017, 08:41 PM
May 2017

Silly me, I was thinking that it would be charitable in return for the arms.

I agree - when the purpose of an infrastructure improvement is for profit, the American people lose.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
46. The term in the article is "Mr. Trump is hoping that......." Selling us to the Saudis. 9/11 what?
Tue May 23, 2017, 03:58 AM
May 2017

Can't wait to drive over Riyadh Toll Bridge in Michigan.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Saudis pump $200bn into r...