U.S. Supreme Court leaves key campaign finance restriction in place
Source: Reuters
Mon May 22, 2017 | 9:58am EDT
By Lawrence Hurley | WASHINGTON
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a Republican challenge to a federal campaign finance restriction that prevents political parties from raising unlimited amounts of cash to spend on supporting candidates.
The Republican Party of Louisiana had argued that a provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act violates free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution. But the justices let stand a lower court's ruling that rejected the Republican challenge.
The brief order noted that conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch favored hearing the case. The conservative-leaning court in recent years has rolled back campaign finance restrictions. In 2010, the court paved the way to unlimited outside spending on elections in a case called FEC v. Citizens United that concerned corporate spending.
In 2014, the court struck down limits on the total amount individuals can donate during the federal two-year election cycle. Both those decisions eroded sections of the 2002 law. The measure is commonly known as the McCain-Feingold law after the two senators who sponsored it, Republican John McCain and Democrat Russ Feingold. It barred state and local parties from taking unlimited donations for any activities concerning federal elections.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election-idUSKBN18I1Q4
dalton99a
(81,513 posts)A precursor of things to come from this asshole
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)They are not very receptive to voting restrictions or slush funds lately
Baitball Blogger
(46,720 posts)a direct correlation with those who support dumping our Constitution along with its government protocols.