Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
Sun Aug 6, 2017, 11:27 PM Aug 2017

Rosenstein: Trump did not direct feds to investigate Clinton

Source: The Hill

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a Sunday interview said President Trump has not directed the Justice Department to “investigate particular people.”

During an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” host Chris Wallace asked Rosenstein if he viewed Trump’s recent comment that prosecutors should be probing Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails as an order.

Trump tweeted about the need for more investigation last Saturday, directing his comments toward Attorney General Jeff Sessions and special counsel Robert Mueller.

"No, Chris. I view what the president says publicly as something he said publicly,” Rosenstein responded.

“If the president wants to give orders to us in the department, he gives that to us privately. And then if we have any feedback, we provide it to him," he continued.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/345528-rosenstein-trump-has-not-directed-us-to-investigate-particular-people

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rosenstein: Trump did not direct feds to investigate Clinton (Original Post) Julian Englis Aug 2017 OP
Why would Rosenstein go on fake new? Iliyah Aug 2017 #1
Yeah, but why even go on real news? I think it would be better to stick to issuing an official deurbano Aug 2017 #4
Rosenstein better be careful Bladewire Aug 2017 #2
will anyone ask his dumbfuck supporters about this JI7 Aug 2017 #3
They are tremendously upset at Session / Deep State for no investigations Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2017 #6
So ridiculously surreal. truthisfreedom Aug 2017 #5
Read it closely. It wasn't exactly a denial. bucolic_frolic Aug 2017 #7

deurbano

(2,895 posts)
4. Yeah, but why even go on real news? I think it would be better to stick to issuing an official
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 01:56 AM
Aug 2017

press release if he feels the record needs correcting or something. Or he could hold a press conference.

JI7

(89,262 posts)
3. will anyone ask his dumbfuck supporters about this
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 01:50 AM
Aug 2017

they cheer him on as he attacks clinton and called for investigation but has done nothing as president to do it.

not that it will make much difference. they will just make something up and keep cheering him on and calling to lock her up.

ignorant dumbfuck assholes.

bucolic_frolic

(43,259 posts)
7. Read it closely. It wasn't exactly a denial.
Mon Aug 7, 2017, 06:50 AM
Aug 2017

It was a segue from specifics to generalities, from substance to process, from
a question about private matters to public policy, and then back to private process.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rosenstein: Trump did not...