Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:22 PM Aug 2017

Eric Bolling initiates lawsuit against reporter behind sexting story

Source: Politico

Fox News host Eric Bolling has initiated a lawsuit against the reporter behind the report that led to his suspension.

Yashar Ali, a contributing writer for HuffPost, reported on Friday that several years ago Bolling sent lewd text messages that included photographs of male genitalia to two female colleagues at Fox. The next day Bolling was suspended and Fox launched an investigation by the same law firm that handled probes into the conduct of former host Bill O'Reilly and former Fox chairman Roger Ailes.

After the initial report, Bolling said, via his lawyer, that he "recalls no such inappropriate communications, does not believe he sent any such communications, and will vigorously pursue his legal remedies for any false and defamatory accusations that are made.”

On Wednesday, Bolling filed a "summons with notice" in New York State Supreme Court against Ali, seeking $50 million in damages for defamation. Ali must respond within 20 days, demanding that Bolling file a complaint, after which Bolling will have 20 days to file his response before the suit goes forward.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2017/08/09/bolling-sexting-fox-lawsuit-241458



Boling's attorney is from Marc Kasowitz law firm, which suggests a legal strategy involving bullying and browbeating.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eric Bolling initiates lawsuit against reporter behind sexting story (Original Post) Julian Englis Aug 2017 OP
The lawsuit was filed by the Kasowitz firm which is trump's firm Gothmog Aug 2017 #1
"Does not believe he sent " translation Watchfoxheadexplodes Aug 2017 #2
Ya that stands out to me as well because something like that I do not believe cstanleytech Aug 2017 #12
"Does not believe he sent" is a telling hedge. forgotmylogin Aug 2017 #15
Seems like the pervert would want to avoid having all his nasty little secrets procon Aug 2017 #3
He sounds confident that there aren't any pics of his dick. (n/t) EL34x4 Aug 2017 #8
Will there be a lineup? yellowcanine Aug 2017 #20
"recalls no such inappropriate communications ... NanceGreggs Aug 2017 #4
I read that as admission, don't you? SunSeeker Aug 2017 #10
Exactly. NanceGreggs Aug 2017 #14
"recalls no such inappropriate communications" - so "maybe he forgets" he did it? PoliticAverse Aug 2017 #5
Must have watched that Pat Robertson video over and over...... Bengus81 Aug 2017 #6
Bolling for dollars. sandensea Aug 2017 #7
Oh goodie. The depo of Bolling will be a hoot! SunSeeker Aug 2017 #9
Maybe they will even have it at Hooters ToxMarz Aug 2017 #11
Nah, don't want Bolling to feel too at home. nt SunSeeker Aug 2017 #17
Eric, deleted from your phone doesn't mean deleted from the phone company servers. TeamPooka Aug 2017 #13
In which case the reporter can prove it. Igel Aug 2017 #18
Defending Bolling is an interesting position on the issue TeamPooka Aug 2017 #19
Oops! dawn frenzy adams Aug 2017 #16

cstanleytech

(26,294 posts)
12. Ya that stands out to me as well because something like that I do not believe
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 08:33 PM
Aug 2017

anyone would forget unless they are suffering from something that affects their memory like Alzheimer's or if they suffered major head trauma.

forgotmylogin

(7,530 posts)
15. "Does not believe he sent" is a telling hedge.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 09:07 PM
Aug 2017

It implies he has sent dick pics to someone at some point in time and can't outright deny it completely as one would: "The allegations are false because I know for sure I have never actually taken pictures of my genitals."

And there are really few reasons to take pictures of your genitals on a phone unless intending to show someone.

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. Seems like the pervert would want to avoid having all his nasty little secrets
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:36 PM
Aug 2017

reveal in discovery. Me thinks the creep is looking to score some Benjamins because reporters have liability insurance that will payoff to avoid a costly trial.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
4. "recalls no such inappropriate communications ...
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:40 PM
Aug 2017
... does not believe he sent any such communications."

Perfectly reasonable response. How many men send pics of male genitalia to women coworkers and simply don't remember doing so? It's just the kind of thing that would slip one's mind.

SunSeeker

(51,572 posts)
10. I read that as admission, don't you?
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 08:12 PM
Aug 2017

I mean, that's like saying "I don't recall robbing a bank..."

That ain't the type of shit you forget.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
14. Exactly.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 08:50 PM
Aug 2017

"So my neighbours were bludgeoned to death. I don't recall murdering them - nor do I believe that I did."


PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
5. "recalls no such inappropriate communications" - so "maybe he forgets" he did it?
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:41 PM
Aug 2017

Last edited Wed Aug 9, 2017, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)

Did he forget precisely how many "photographs of male genitalia" he's sent?

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
6. Must have watched that Pat Robertson video over and over......
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:50 PM
Aug 2017

It's all a setup,all those women accusing those nice white guys on FOX of sexual things are liars,etc,etc.........

sandensea

(21,639 posts)
7. Bolling for dollars.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 07:54 PM
Aug 2017

My guess is that he was a real spendthrift while the money rolled in, and now that the tap has been unceremoniously shut off he's desperate.

Blow and fast girls ain't free, you know.

TeamPooka

(24,229 posts)
13. Eric, deleted from your phone doesn't mean deleted from the phone company servers.
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 08:49 PM
Aug 2017

They still exist
Oops.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
18. In which case the reporter can prove it.
Thu Aug 10, 2017, 12:04 AM
Aug 2017

It's really a way of getting the reporter to either recant or substantiate his claims.

That could involve somebody who received them having kept them or several people independently remembering them. Either way, you get names.

Or you get the report recanted, and while the accusation is sufficient evidence of guilt for many people, it can lead to additional legal action or to his continuing to work someplace with the assumption that the stigma of an unsubstantiated allegation will fade.

(Look, I've been on the receiving end of allegations from 3 people that supposedly all recalled independently what I said. One person twisted something and then next I know two additional people confirm it, so all the facts are established before I'm even asked what happened. Work became hell. Except that one person was there and months later remembered that the conversation occurred while the second person was in the bathroom--we were waiting for her to finish. And the third person, when asked about details, wasn't there at all but across town. There had to be four of us there because we were playing hearts--and when that third person couldn't have been there it was suddenly remembered that there *was* somebody else there, who just happened to in town for a week when the conversation happened. He was called. He cleared me. By then I'd been so insulted, curtailed, abused, that I had quit. So how many independent witnesses were there? One. And she got it wrong because she was far from the sharpest tool in the shed. Result: I don't like herasay and unsubstantiated allegations. Even when several people remember something clearly, unless you challenge them instead of just pumping them for information you may not realize that all the stories stem from one person. Now, if that one person has proof, great. If that one person doesn't, that one person may be exaggerating, lying, telling just part of the truth, or telling the whole truth--you just can't tell.)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Eric Bolling initiates la...