John Kelly: 'The lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War'
Source: CNBC
White House Chief of Staff John Kelly on Monday said, "the lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War."
Speaking to Fox News, Kelly offered a view of history in which both sides of the Civil War a pro-slavery Confederacy and the opposing Union were made up of "men and women of good faith."
-snip-
Kelly then explained his view of the Civil War: "[Confederate General] Robert E. Lee was an honorable man who gave up his country to fight for his state," Kelly said. "One hundred and fifty years ago, that was more important than country it was always loyalty to state back in those days. Now it's different. But the lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War, and men and women of good faith on both sides made their stand where their conscience had them make their stand."
Kelly did not elaborate about what compromise would have prevented a war fought over the future of slavery in the United States. Southern U.S. states began seceding from the Union in December 1860, following the election one month earlier of President Abraham Lincoln, whose Republican Party had strong anti-slavery sentiments. The economy of the mostly agricultural South was at that time dependent on massive-scale, slave labor.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/30/john-kelly-a-lack-of-ability-to-compromise-led-to-the-civil-war.html
The article goes on to say that CNBC has asked the WH "to clarify what compromises Kelly believes were lacking in the lead-up to to the Civil War."
Apparently no response so far...
I'm so disgusted by Kelly.
GD thread about this, started after I first saw tweets about what Kelly had said:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029773702
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Fuck Him! Period. Racist Ass....
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)bigotry.
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)Two years after the start of the war, 1/3 of Virginia was conquered and made into a new Northern state. No other state lost territory in the war.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)hibbing
(10,098 posts)He's running the most vile campaign since, well, since the current resident of the White House. Never forget he was the Chair of the Republican National Committee. Blatant racism alive and well in that putrid party as it has been for decades.
Peace
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)is record-breaking. they're just off the charts batshit crazy.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)I think if General Kelly had an officer in his command who took up arms against the US military, he would order a court martial.
Robt. E. Lee was a handsome man who looked great in uniform. He should have been hanged for treason. If General Kelly doesn't understand that, it's good that he's retired and working for another traitor.
mahina
(17,668 posts)Really good point. I find that pretty consistently, the right advocates for actions without asking how they would feel if it were happening to them.
See you around DU. Aloha.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)Slavery legal 3 days a week and alternate Sundays?
The North's only mistake after winning was not insisting that every slave owner and wannabe slave owner be exiled to Brazil along with the Conferderados.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederados
without their slaves
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Yupster
(14,308 posts)It was a committee of senators who met in Washington after Lincoln's election. The purpose was to find a compromise that would keep the southern states from seceding.
During the election campaign of 1860, Lincoln said over and over again that he was no a threat to the south's slavery. He wanted to stop it from expanding to new territories but vowed not to try to end it where it existed.
Therefore, the Crittenden Committee to convince the south that Lincoln was not trying to take their slaves.
John Crittenden led the committee. He was from Kentucky, a border state and the home of the original Great Compromiser, Henry Clay. William Seward led the republicans on the committee and the most famous southerner on the committee was former Secretary of War and current senator from Mississippi Jefferson Davis.
The committee met until Christmas but it was a failure. Seward kept asking Lincoln for directions as to what the President-elect would accept. He said he could give no advice as he was not yet president. Back in those days you got elected in November, but you didn't take office until the next March. As the southern states seceded, their senators made tearful goodbye speeches on the senate floor and went home.
This is one of the criticisms of Lincoln. He gave Seward no instructions on which to negotiate. Another criticism of Lincoln is how he spent the November to March period touring the big cities of the north holding victory rallies. At the same time, pro-union forces in Virginia, North Carolina and Tennessee were fighting to keep their states in the union. The criticism is that he should have been in Knoxville fighting to keep Tennessee in the union rather than in Buffalo.
hoping4betterdays
(6 posts)I'm so sick of all this patriotism fake patriotism mumbo jumbo. We've got a society of fake Christians & fake patriots who worship idols & not God. Stop worshipping the flag, the anthem & this land it means nothing without God. And the second saddest part is that so-called patriots came here and stole this land, turned around and made rules that they broke over & over. So-called Christian & patriots kidnapped slaves beat, whipped, raped & bred them like animals. How does that happen when you pledge your allegiance to a flag that says "liberty & justice for all" & "One Nation Under God". What God would condone racism when HE teaches us to treat thy neighbor as thyself, I will not make my neighbor my footstool". Did all these fake Christians & fake patriots ever think about our Father with all of this hate in their hearts? Just save the fake patriotism, the real ones serving God know it's just a ploy to keep people especially the black people in there place, give them some rules to live by here if they want to stay, don't do as we say then go back to Africa. Patriotism is fake.
God Before Country Always
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,006 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)I wonder what "compromise" he thinks would have been better than, you know, emancipation.
"You aren't enslaved for your whole life! Just your productive years. Then when you're 60, if you live that long, you'll be free."
Yeah, great "compromise."
We already made a huge compromise when the Union didn't hang every confederate politician and general and put their heads on pikes around the White House.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)Stephens stated that advances in science proved that enslavement of African Americans by white men was justified, and that it coincided with the Bible's teachings. He also stated that the Confederacy was the first country in the world founded on the principle of racial supremacy:
""" Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. """
cstanleytech
(26,294 posts)have largely refused to and have been the party of our way or the highway since Clinton took office.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,006 posts)dalton99a
(81,515 posts)Fuck John Kelly
Yupster
(14,308 posts)not threatening slavery where it existed. He didn't want it expanded into the territories.
He claimed that he was not a threat to the southern slates slavery. Therefore they had no reason to secede. The southern states didn't believe him.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Justice
(7,188 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)It's not a civil war, it's a class warand the rich are trying to bury that fact.
canetoad
(17,168 posts)That serves no useful purpose.
Let us be clear about the definition of slavery. A slave is a person who is the legal property of another and is forced, by law, under threat of punishment, to obey their owner.
Great Britain used slaves to further the interests of wealthy men. In 1833 a law passed through both the Lords and House of Commons to abolish slavery and, with exceptions, became the law of the land.
These so-called heroes fought for the right to own, legally another human being. There are no excuses for them.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
icymist This message was self-deleted by its author.
icymist
(15,888 posts)weissmam
(905 posts)what a ass whole
7962
(11,841 posts)Best thing that ever happened to the South was LOSING the civil war. This comes form someone who had 2 ancestors fight on the southern side.
Although, contrary to popular southern stories, neither were fighting for slavery. According to my grandparents, neither even knew there WAS a war going on until they were "drafted" at home and sent off to fight. One was shot in the arm.
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)Would the south have giving the slaves freedom on weekends?
moonseller66
(430 posts)When you think about it, aren't many Americans basically indentured to their corporate masters Monday through Friday with "Free Weekends off?"
Of course the real (lower) servants are those who must work schedules that don't allow a nice weekend, or 5:00 P.M. to 9:00 A.M. M-F sleep time...or holidays off!
The South may not have won, but Corporate America through the Industrial Revolution sure looks as though it did!
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)When he made called Luis Gutierrez an "empty barrel" when he was Secretary of DHS, when he agreed with Fatso's Muslim ban, and when he gave his infamous LYING like a RUG "Take this backhand you "Empty barrel ni@@er woman" speech TO Representative Wilson (Now, she's getting death threats), I knew he was NO DAMN GOOD, and I don't give a crap if he is a Gold Star Dad, He doesn't have the right to LIE on somebody and try to ruin their reputation, while at the same time defending a racist, sexist, misogynistic, treasonous, mentally-ill piece of shit in tRumputin.
He's just like tRump, only smoother with his racist, sexist, misogynistic bull shit. That's all.
He's a tRump enabler, a RACIST PIECE OF SHIT, and a man with NO honor. My 79 year old friend whose a decorated Marine who lost his sight in his right eye during military service said that if Kelly or tRumputin were on fire, he wouldn't piss on them to put the fire out. Oh well
zentrum
(9,865 posts)....do have a cabal of White Supremacists in the WH. This is horrifying.
What steps can we take to demand his resignation? Will the Dem leaders step into this?
It's beyond outrageous.
HAB911
(8,904 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)...to compromise, if you want to accept his framing.
Kinda the way some people nowadays act when they frame centrist Democratic politicians as if they were leading members of the Symbionese Liberation Army.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)We do ourselves no favors by dragging vampires into the shade and opening a vein to feed them when we have them trapped in the sunlight.
KatyMan
(4,198 posts)"do it our way"
briv1016
(1,570 posts)Nitram
(22,822 posts)lark
(23,105 posts)Misogynistic. racist, liar, who doesn't take responsibility for his own words and who condones and cheers torture, they have so very many traits in common. Both are totally despicable as well as deplorable.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)Fuck you, Kelly. Do the right thing and disappear.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)and then a slave owner from July to December. I'm sure he would have been happy with that, if only his uppity slaves hadn't shown a lack of good faith and demanded more ...
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Good god, THANKS TRUMP VOTERS FOR ELECTING THIS ABOMINATION.