Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 11:22 AM Nov 2017

Trump pledges new wave of 'major sanctions' on North Korea after call with China's Xi

Source: The Washington Post




By Simon Denyer November 29 at 10:15 AM

BEIJING — President Trump pledged Wednesday that “additional major sanctions” would be imposed on North Korea after Pyongyang's latest intercontinental missile test.

Trump’s statement followed a telephone conversation with his Chinese President Xi Jinping, whose country is an economic lifeline for North Korea. Beijing’s backing is needed for any additional economic pressures on the regime of Kim Jong Un, and it was unclear how far China could go in applying new sanctions.

“Just spoke to President XI JINPING of China concerning the latest provocative actions of North Korea,” Trump tweeted. “Additional major sanctions will be imposed on North Korea today. This situation will be handled!”

On Wednesday, North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, its third and most advanced yet, with experts calculating that the U.S. capital is now technically within North Korean reach.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/north-korea-missile-test-provides-a-fresh-challenge-for-trumps-relationship-with-china/2017/11/29/c35f0880-d4e1-11e7-9461-ba77d604373d_story.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump pledges new wave of 'major sanctions' on North Korea after call with China's Xi (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2017 OP
Point of order and logic: why would NK fire a 10000 mile missile only 1000 miles? Fred Sanders Nov 2017 #1
Crashing the missile in the Sea of Japan is playing it safe, relatively speaking. Eugene Nov 2017 #2
Keeping a close eye on NK is obviously prudent and vital. BobTheSubgenius Nov 2017 #3

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. Point of order and logic: why would NK fire a 10000 mile missile only 1000 miles?
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 12:02 PM
Nov 2017

Seems like same old same old. But if I just had a 3 carrier war armada practising invasion just off shore I might tend to exaggerate a bit myself.

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
2. Crashing the missile in the Sea of Japan is playing it safe, relatively speaking.
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 12:34 PM
Nov 2017

They shot the missile almost 3,000 miles straight up. A more conventional trajectory could have taken the missile 8,800 miles.

They got a 30+ minute burn without landing it near Guam.

BobTheSubgenius

(11,563 posts)
3. Keeping a close eye on NK is obviously prudent and vital.
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 12:50 PM
Nov 2017

But, I think it's noteworthy that, so far, they have managed to hit the ocean. I live on an island, and with no physics background, am pretty confident that even I could hit the ocean.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump pledges new wave of...