Dem lawmaker: Manafort is guilty of treason
Source: The Hill
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, on Monday alleged that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort committed treason by drafting an op-ed with a Russian associate with ties to the Kremlin.
The nerve. At this point, lets just call this what it is, treason, Swalwell wrote on Twitter. Hes out on bail in the #TrumpRussia investigation and hes giving comfort and aid to an enemy.
Swalwell had quoted a tweet that included screenshots of the court documents from the special counsel.
A prosecutor working on the special counsel investigation argued in court documents that Manaforts request to be released from house arrest should be denied due to the draft op-ed.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/363263-dem-lawmaker-manafort-is-guilty-of-treason
This Manafort character / traitorous asshole needs to thrown in jail----------------then the sessions and the Pence's and Kushers's and Trumps, and anyone else can see what they are to be seeing really soon----------your Traitors
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)Lulu KC
(2,567 posts)Lock him up. Seriously.
Orrex
(63,215 posts)It's not as though he's a dangerous criminal, like a black father of three accused of a traffic violation, for instance.
barbtries
(28,798 posts)the republicans are no friends of democracy. our country is unrecognizable to me.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,084 posts)And my mother (who would have been 87 this year and was a poli-sci major) would remark about that every once in awhile.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,924 posts)Not Treason. Treason is very narrowly defined and extremely hard to get a conviction for. Highly doubtful anyone will face treason charges. Now one of the various conspiracy charges, thats a different story.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)I know that wont happen of course.
ffr
(22,670 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)I have been corrected in that treason requires a shooting war.
PSPS
(13,600 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)This is more about changing the narrative. We're being all cautious with collusion, which has the pushback of it not being a crime. But when you go with "treason" it makes it clear.
It's like the old Carlin bit about how SHELL SHOCK ends up becoming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
We want dems to actually play the game that needs to be played in the media to get attention and change the narrative to what we want. This is how you do it.
If they're going to elect an accused serial pedophile, it's time to finally adapt more. This isn't a low road approach but a way of working the media to set the tone.
iluvtennis
(19,862 posts)the word. What Russia did in the 2016 elections is Cyber warfare. And what Manafort did in the Op-Ed is media (and social media) warfare. You don't have to have firearms a'blazin to have treason. Out current laws on treason need to be re-written for the 21st century.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)It might be a bit hyperbolic, but given the way Putin and friends have attacked our democracy, it's looking like we've begun Cold War II.
eta:
As others noted, treason sets a tone. Get them to deny "treason" like they do collusion. The more the word is used, even in denial, the more it will stick in the public's mind.
The advantage of treason is that most folks understand the term and grasp the seriousness. Collusion, not so much.
Nitram
(22,813 posts)A slow, quiet, behind the scenes struggle over the truth. Russia invaded the U.S. via the internet, invaded people's homes and workplaces, and worked to influence their vote in the presidential election. Or just to deepen divisions and set people at teach other's throats. They organized conflicting demonstrations pretending to be American citizens on one or the other side of a political divide. They recruited agents to secretly represent Russia's interests at the very top of the government.
I am making the point that we use words like treason and war in a non-legal sense the majority of the time, and we are not speaking to the legal aspects of the issues we discuss in those terms. Words have very different meanings in ordinary discourse than they do in legal settings.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Countries that are at war with one another do not maintain diplomatic relations. Countries that are at war with one another do not allow citizens to travel between the two countries. Countries that are at war with one another do not do billions of dollars in bilateral trade.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)What specifically leads you to believe the context was legal rather than informal usage? The court-room setting? The white wigs on magistrates? The ominous sound-track in the back-ground.
It saddens me when a "poster" doesn't take time to understand context. But I get it.. we all want to look more clever than we are, even if the attempt works in the opposite direction.
onenote
(42,714 posts)And quoting the legal definition of treason?
Nitram
(22,813 posts)You seem to look at the world only through a legal lens.
So full of artless jealousy is guilt,
It spills itself in fearing to be spilt.
― William Shakespeare, Hamlet
Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.
― Voltaire
My guiding principle is this: Guilt is never to be doubted.
― Franz Kafka
The hardest thing about depression is that it is addictive. It begins to feel uncomfortable not to be depressed. You feel guilty for feeling happy.
― Pete Wentz
Maybe there's more we all could have done, but we just have to let the guilt remind us to do better next time.
― Veronica Roth, Divergent
I've got a bad case of the 3:00 am guilts - you know, when you lie in bed awake and replay all those things you didn't do right?
― D.D. Barant, Dying Bites
There are two kinds of guilt: the kind that drowns you until youre useless, and the kind that fires your soul to purpose.
― Sabaa Tahir, An Ember in the Ashes
Guilt is not a response to anger; it is a response to ones own actions or lack of action.
― Audre Lorde, Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches
(I)f we are going to be kind, let it be out of simple generosity, not because we fear guilt or retribution.
― J.M. Coetzee, Disgrace
onenote
(42,714 posts)"He's guilty of being a jackass" -- use of guilty not intended in a legal sense
"He's guilty of committing treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy" = use of guilty intended in a legal sense.
ProfessorGAC
(65,061 posts)The entire success of the R's over the last 3+decades is by redefining terms to send a message. We better learn to do the same or we're staring at more R success.
The narrative needs to blare "treason, treason, treason!" The legal details are lost on the majority who know what it is and don't much care what the narrow definition is, legally.
We have got to get the majority of americans to stop thinking of this as "nothing". The word treason will get the attention of some of them.
Nitram
(22,813 posts)We need to use words that strike on the gut level. Treason! In this war for hearts and minds there is no time for the technicalities of legalese. We'll leave that to the courts.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,061 posts)The legalese is not as important and shifting the narrative away from "the Russia thing is nothing" for the general public.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)I don't completely agree with it, but I understand what your saying.
so yeah, treason...(say with a weak cry and a loose fist in the air)
Gothmog
(145,301 posts)paleotn
(17,931 posts)they get sent to jail. I guess Manafort isn't most people.
bluestarone
(16,972 posts)along with losing his property! BUT that won't happen til he misses his court date!