Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:26 AM Dec 2017

Rep. Conyers: Im retiring today

Source: Detroit News

Embattled U.S. Rep. John Conyers, the longest-serving member of Congress, will retire, rather than seek re-election amid allegations that he sexually harassed staffers, he said Tuesday.

Conyers made the announcement Tuesday morning from a Detroit hospital during a phone interview on The Mildred Gaddis Show, 102.7 FM, in which he said the accusations against him will absolutely not affect his legacy.

My legacy cant be compromised or diminished in anyway by what were going through now. This too shall pass. My legacy will continue through my children, Conyers said. ...Im retiring today.

He endorsed his son, John Conyers III, to succeed him in Congress.

Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/12/05/conyers-retire-resign-says-relative/108325662/



...and according to the New York Times, his grand nephew may run as well.

Anyone know what the rules of dynastic succession say?
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Conyers: Im retiring today (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2017 OP
Even further, he's retiring as of today. George II Dec 2017 #1
Very good, Mr. Conyers. yallerdawg Dec 2017 #2
...and Conyers could have kept his mouth shut about a successor. brooklynite Dec 2017 #3
Wow. Yet another rule. Where do voters fit in, in your rule book? Demit Dec 2017 #5
The voters have a right to vote for who they want; Conyers has a right to endorse his son... brooklynite Dec 2017 #8
Hear! Hear! SharonClark Dec 2017 #24
Perfectly stated. n/t Tom Rinaldo Dec 2017 #28
Of course you do. And I have a right to disdain your wanting it to be a "rule." Demit Dec 2017 #30
He doesn't, Demit. That was a joke. Hortensis Dec 2017 #41
I'm all for humor. Demit Dec 2017 #43
Brooklynite's a good Democrat, Demit, Hortensis Dec 2017 #47
Well I don't understand your insistence on making things personal. Demit Dec 2017 #53
Just a misunderstanding of the ideas being expressed. Hortensis Dec 2017 #55
The voters will vote for who they want. Just because Conyers endorsed his son he'll win? George II Dec 2017 #38
and you have the right to continually badger those that don't speak "Brooklynite" values. BoneyardDem Dec 2017 #58
Psst...can I let you in on a secret? brooklynite Dec 2017 #59
I don't care either...yet look, reponses BoneyardDem Dec 2017 #60
What would his son think... yallerdawg Dec 2017 #9
This is an absolutely safe Democratic district...the voters can choose whomever they want. brooklynite Dec 2017 #14
I'm saying... yallerdawg Dec 2017 #17
Monica should be disqualified MichMan Dec 2017 #20
Is she legally disqualified from running for office? yallerdawg Dec 2017 #23
There's a difference between "disqualified" and "unendorsed" brooklynite Dec 2017 #22
Thank you. SharonClark Dec 2017 #26
You have a serious beef with Conyers' son. yallerdawg Dec 2017 #27
Dont live in his district, so doesn't matter to me MichMan Dec 2017 #31
I reckon there's a number of things that can disqualify a candidate. yallerdawg Dec 2017 #33
The voters in his district can elect whomever they want MichMan Dec 2017 #35
It smacks of entitlement BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #36
Simple solution. yallerdawg Dec 2017 #39
Who has suggested disqualifying him? brooklynite Dec 2017 #42
Simple answer: nepotism will always suck BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #44
:) Well, voters disagree on that, right? I was repelled Hortensis Dec 2017 #52
Why is a 27-year-old with no political experience other than getting fined BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #54
Because he'd be a candidate? The serious consideration Hortensis Dec 2017 #56
I believe the rule states that being a son or daughter doesn't disqualify you from running. Demit Dec 2017 #4
Dynastic succession rule: sins of the father should not be visited on the son Cicada Dec 2017 #6
His son has zero political experience as far as I know MichMan Dec 2017 #21
I believe he's in the Michigan State Legislature Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2017 #48
That is his grand nephew in the State legislature MichMan Dec 2017 #50
That is his nephew Ian Conyers BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #51
you don't get to define your own legacy FYI Conyers snooper2 Dec 2017 #7
Who will succeed in the interim? AlleganCarpenter Dec 2017 #10
House seats are not filled by appointment...they remain vacant until an election is held. brooklynite Dec 2017 #15
Who else knew that there were issues? Renew Deal Dec 2017 #11
If I understand Michigan law... Grins Dec 2017 #12
nope. mopinko Dec 2017 #18
Not for the House - seat remains vacant until an election dbackjon Dec 2017 #19
His son has zero political experienceas far as I know MichMan Dec 2017 #13
What is the difference between retiring and resigning? oberliner Dec 2017 #16
Good question. Maybe pension, health insurance, etc. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2017 #46
None, legally. former9thward Dec 2017 #49
Good, but why is no one demanding the same of Farenthold? Adenoid_Hynkel Dec 2017 #25
"Why is no one demanding the same of Farenthold?" LenaBaby61 Dec 2017 #29
No one believes Farenthold actually has a penis jmowreader Dec 2017 #61
They say the same thing as the rules on term limits ToxMarz Dec 2017 #32
Rep. John Conyers III, and President Ivanka Trump! bullwinkle428 Dec 2017 #34
Re: Conyers' son: Stonepounder Dec 2017 #37
Conyers was one of a handful in Congress to stand up to the Bushies yurbud Dec 2017 #40
Judiciary Committee senaca Dec 2017 #45
Jerrold Nadler, major upgrade BeyondGeography Dec 2017 #57
Jerrold Nadler was named acting ranking member. N/T lapucelle Dec 2017 #62

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
2. Very good, Mr. Conyers.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:39 AM
Dec 2017

Nancy Pelosi said you would do the right thing - and you did.

And "dynastic succession?"

Anyone can run. Everyone can vote. We call that democracy!

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
3. ...and Conyers could have kept his mouth shut about a successor.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:43 AM
Dec 2017

Far too many autocrats seems to think the only adequate replacement is their own progeny. Conyers shouldn't be joining in.

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
8. The voters have a right to vote for who they want; Conyers has a right to endorse his son...
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:51 AM
Dec 2017

I have a right to be disdainful of people who use their political clout to promote their own family members.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
30. Of course you do. And I have a right to disdain your wanting it to be a "rule."
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:46 PM
Dec 2017

I hope we now have straightened out what everybody's rights are

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
41. He doesn't, Demit. That was a joke.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 02:12 PM
Dec 2017

You seem to be in a combative mood. Maybe put it to good use by finding a Republican to kick? A whole bunch over on DI who really deserve it.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
43. I'm all for humor.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 03:14 PM
Dec 2017

Which part was funny? Where the OP called Conyers an autocrat, or where he/she said Conyers should keep his mouth shut? Enlighten me.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
47. Brooklynite's a good Democrat, Demit,
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 03:43 PM
Dec 2017

and I don't understand the hostility being expressed. A lot of it is following Brooklynite around lately, and that's not okay. This is DU. We're all supposed to be on the same general team here.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
53. Well I don't understand your insistence on making things personal.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 04:09 PM
Dec 2017

I don't attack posters personally. I focus on ideas. So back off.

 

BoneyardDem

(1,202 posts)
58. and you have the right to continually badger those that don't speak "Brooklynite" values.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 06:19 PM
Dec 2017

and you've done so very well.

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
59. Psst...can I let you in on a secret?
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 06:22 PM
Dec 2017

This is a political blog. We state our opinions about politics here.

You're welcome to either ignore or criticize anything I say. I don't care.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. What would his son think...
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:52 AM
Dec 2017

if his own father wouldn't endorse him?

What would the voters think?

So now we hold just Democrats to a higher moral standard (the Dotard) and now let's throw in family loyalty (Bush and Bush 2.0)?

How many more ways can we find to lose elections and representatives?

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
14. This is an absolutely safe Democratic district...the voters can choose whomever they want.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

Are you saying that only the Conyers family can produce qualified candidates?

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
17. I'm saying...
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:17 PM
Dec 2017

we can't say any members of the Conyers' family are disqualified.

Safe? Remember Ted Kennedy's safe seat?

When an incumbent goes down, it becomes a lot more probable that anything can happen.

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
20. Monica should be disqualified
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:31 PM
Dec 2017

His wife Monica should be disqualified. She was convicted of accepting bribes a few years ago while City Council President and served time in jail.

Her term as City Council president was controversial due to infighting with other council members etc.



yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
23. Is she legally disqualified from running for office?
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:35 PM
Dec 2017

You can "disqualify" her in the voting booth.

As you know, we elect criminals all the time.

brooklynite

(94,596 posts)
22. There's a difference between "disqualified" and "unendorsed"
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:32 PM
Dec 2017

And yes, there's an immense difference between a D +32 House seat and a Senate seat in a State that has a history of also electing Republicans statewide. (See: Mitt Romney).

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
27. You have a serious beef with Conyers' son.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:42 PM
Dec 2017

In general, we don't disqualify family members because someone has held office.

I can't imagine why a father wouldn't endorse his son - under any circumstances.

Conyers did the right thing. Endorsing his son just makes him wrong all over again?

What do you want - a sharp razor and a warm bath? Jeez!

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
31. Dont live in his district, so doesn't matter to me
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:50 PM
Dec 2017

I just hope Detroit elects someone who is qualified to serve the constituents of the district. John Conyers III may be the greatest next political superstar, but with zero political experience, not convinced he is up to the job or not.

Detroit has made some poor choices in the past (Kwame Kilpatrick, Monica Conyers, Charles Pugh) , I hope they get the representation they deserve with all the challenges they face.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
33. I reckon there's a number of things that can disqualify a candidate.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:57 PM
Dec 2017

Being a "son" is not one of them.

Of course, the voters may determine it is a disqualification - in the voting booth. They "disqualify" people in every election.

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
35. The voters in his district can elect whomever they want
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:08 PM
Dec 2017

Since neither of us live in his district, our opinions don't really matter anyway.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
36. It smacks of entitlement
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:29 PM
Dec 2017

This is my seat, if I can’t have it because I messed up, my name stays on it. We shouldn’t be so eager to support “servants” who see their positions as private playthings.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
39. Simple solution.
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:46 PM
Dec 2017

Don't vote for him.

Personally, I won't disqualify a candidate because of his relations.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
52. :) Well, voters disagree on that, right? I was repelled
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 04:04 PM
Dec 2017

when I was only 10 years old by all the unprincipled "Camelot" "America's ruling family" garbage that colored the news when Kennedy was president (apparently a hard-wired, to-the-bone thing in me), but a lot of people around me ate it up and were eager to elect "Bobby" first and foremost because of it.

So I'm generally speaking with you, but fwiw, I have no particular problem with Conyers endorsing his son--as long as it doesn't elect him. The ball is in his constituents' court to examine all choices responsibly and refuse to make frivolous, nostalgic decisions. Conyers was greatly honored to be allowed to serve in congress for an amazing five decades. He owed his constituents everything right up to the moment of his resignation. They owe him perhaps the courtesy of considering his son, if they choose, and they owe the son nothing but the sensible, serious consideration all candidates deserve.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
54. Why is a 27-year-old with no political experience other than getting fined
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 04:10 PM
Dec 2017

for misusing a taxpayer-owned vehicle owed serious consideration? I mean other than his daddy’s last name?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
56. Because he'd be a candidate? The serious consideration
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 04:14 PM
Dec 2017

is above all what we owe to OURSELVES and our society, although it translates into courtesy to the candidates as well.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
6. Dynastic succession rule: sins of the father should not be visited on the son
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:47 AM
Dec 2017

His son should be considered on his own merits

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
21. His son has zero political experience as far as I know
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:32 PM
Dec 2017

I agree that the sins of the father shouldn't transfer to the son, but I also believe that having the same last name as a political icon should not confer any special status due to name recognition.

Unfortunately, Detroit has elected several officeholders over the years related to well known political families that turned out to be terrible choices.

That would include both Monica Conyers and mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
50. That is his grand nephew in the State legislature
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 03:57 PM
Dec 2017

That is his grand nephew Ian. Ian had already indicated he was planning on running .

John Conyers III has no political experience and has not stated if he wants it or not

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
7. you don't get to define your own legacy FYI Conyers
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:49 AM
Dec 2017

You did a lot of good- And everyone will always know about the bad

AlleganCarpenter

(25 posts)
10. Who will succeed in the interim?
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 11:57 AM
Dec 2017

Last edited Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

Snyder will probably appoint a RW hack who will only make it easier for Ryan to pass his nutty agenda.
I believe a quid pro quo is in order. for everyone of ours who resigns/retires, two of theirs should bite the dust.
After all they have the moral responsibility on their side. Snark

I stand corrected. Snyder can call for a special election. Apparently, he is not bound to it which would leave the seat unfilled til the next general.

Grins

(7,218 posts)
12. If I understand Michigan law...
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:01 PM
Dec 2017

Conyer's successor will be appointed by the Governor, in this case, skeevy Republican, Rick Snyder.

However...

The appointee must come from the departed/departing office holder's party!

Gonna' be fun to watch this.

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
13. His son has zero political experienceas far as I know
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

At least it isn't his wife Monica he wants to succeed him

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
29. "Why is no one demanding the same of Farenthold?"
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:45 PM
Dec 2017

He's a thuglican. You know how that is with the so-called liberal media that doesn't exist.

ToxMarz

(2,169 posts)
32. They say the same thing as the rules on term limits
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 12:55 PM
Dec 2017

There aren't any, we have elections. The problem isn't a lack of rules to control the electorate, it is ignorance (willful and actual), stupidity, co-option by special interests (including religion), edc. It can't be fixed with rules "disqualifying" certain classes we may be able to find anecdotal evidence of abuses, if we did those rules would just then be turned inside out to work against us.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
34. Rep. John Conyers III, and President Ivanka Trump!
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:02 PM
Dec 2017

Meat Goblin says, "I gotcher woman President right here!!"

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
37. Re: Conyers' son:
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:31 PM
Dec 2017

Does anyone know whether the son has any interest in running for office? Many children find they have absolutely no interest in following in their father's/mother's footsteps.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
40. Conyers was one of a handful in Congress to stand up to the Bushies
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:48 PM
Dec 2017

that doesn't exonerate any of his harassment, but we need someone with his courage in the House, not a "go along to get along" replacement.

senaca

(209 posts)
45. Judiciary Committee
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 03:32 PM
Dec 2017

When John Conyers stepped down from the Judiciary Committee, who was elected to take his place and has that happened yet? How does this effect the Judiciary Committee and what are the implications going forward?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rep. Conyers: Im retiring...