Rep. Conyers: Im retiring today
Source: Detroit News
Embattled U.S. Rep. John Conyers, the longest-serving member of Congress, will retire, rather than seek re-election amid allegations that he sexually harassed staffers, he said Tuesday.
Conyers made the announcement Tuesday morning from a Detroit hospital during a phone interview on The Mildred Gaddis Show, 102.7 FM, in which he said the accusations against him will absolutely not affect his legacy.
My legacy cant be compromised or diminished in anyway by what were going through now. This too shall pass. My legacy will continue through my children, Conyers said. ...Im retiring today.
He endorsed his son, John Conyers III, to succeed him in Congress.
Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/12/05/conyers-retire-resign-says-relative/108325662/
...and according to the New York Times, his grand nephew may run as well.
Anyone know what the rules of dynastic succession say?
George II
(67,782 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Nancy Pelosi said you would do the right thing - and you did.
And "dynastic succession?"
Anyone can run. Everyone can vote. We call that democracy!
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)Far too many autocrats seems to think the only adequate replacement is their own progeny. Conyers shouldn't be joining in.
Demit
(11,238 posts)brooklynite
(94,596 posts)I have a right to be disdainful of people who use their political clout to promote their own family members.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)I hope we now have straightened out what everybody's rights are
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)You seem to be in a combative mood. Maybe put it to good use by finding a Republican to kick? A whole bunch over on DI who really deserve it.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Which part was funny? Where the OP called Conyers an autocrat, or where he/she said Conyers should keep his mouth shut? Enlighten me.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and I don't understand the hostility being expressed. A lot of it is following Brooklynite around lately, and that's not okay. This is DU. We're all supposed to be on the same general team here.
Demit
(11,238 posts)I don't attack posters personally. I focus on ideas. So back off.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Glad to hear it.
George II
(67,782 posts)BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)and you've done so very well.
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)This is a political blog. We state our opinions about politics here.
You're welcome to either ignore or criticize anything I say. I don't care.
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)if his own father wouldn't endorse him?
What would the voters think?
So now we hold just Democrats to a higher moral standard (the Dotard) and now let's throw in family loyalty (Bush and Bush 2.0)?
How many more ways can we find to lose elections and representatives?
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)Are you saying that only the Conyers family can produce qualified candidates?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)we can't say any members of the Conyers' family are disqualified.
Safe? Remember Ted Kennedy's safe seat?
When an incumbent goes down, it becomes a lot more probable that anything can happen.
MichMan
(11,938 posts)His wife Monica should be disqualified. She was convicted of accepting bribes a few years ago while City Council President and served time in jail.
Her term as City Council president was controversial due to infighting with other council members etc.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)You can "disqualify" her in the voting booth.
As you know, we elect criminals all the time.
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)And yes, there's an immense difference between a D +32 House seat and a Senate seat in a State that has a history of also electing Republicans statewide. (See: Mitt Romney).
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)In general, we don't disqualify family members because someone has held office.
I can't imagine why a father wouldn't endorse his son - under any circumstances.
Conyers did the right thing. Endorsing his son just makes him wrong all over again?
What do you want - a sharp razor and a warm bath? Jeez!
MichMan
(11,938 posts)I just hope Detroit elects someone who is qualified to serve the constituents of the district. John Conyers III may be the greatest next political superstar, but with zero political experience, not convinced he is up to the job or not.
Detroit has made some poor choices in the past (Kwame Kilpatrick, Monica Conyers, Charles Pugh) , I hope they get the representation they deserve with all the challenges they face.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Being a "son" is not one of them.
Of course, the voters may determine it is a disqualification - in the voting booth. They "disqualify" people in every election.
MichMan
(11,938 posts)Since neither of us live in his district, our opinions don't really matter anyway.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)This is my seat, if I cant have it because I messed up, my name stays on it. We shouldnt be so eager to support servants who see their positions as private playthings.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Don't vote for him.
Personally, I won't disqualify a candidate because of his relations.
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)when I was only 10 years old by all the unprincipled "Camelot" "America's ruling family" garbage that colored the news when Kennedy was president (apparently a hard-wired, to-the-bone thing in me), but a lot of people around me ate it up and were eager to elect "Bobby" first and foremost because of it.
So I'm generally speaking with you, but fwiw, I have no particular problem with Conyers endorsing his son--as long as it doesn't elect him. The ball is in his constituents' court to examine all choices responsibly and refuse to make frivolous, nostalgic decisions. Conyers was greatly honored to be allowed to serve in congress for an amazing five decades. He owed his constituents everything right up to the moment of his resignation. They owe him perhaps the courtesy of considering his son, if they choose, and they owe the son nothing but the sensible, serious consideration all candidates deserve.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)for misusing a taxpayer-owned vehicle owed serious consideration? I mean other than his daddys last name?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)is above all what we owe to OURSELVES and our society, although it translates into courtesy to the candidates as well.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Cicada
(4,533 posts)His son should be considered on his own merits
MichMan
(11,938 posts)I agree that the sins of the father shouldn't transfer to the son, but I also believe that having the same last name as a political icon should not confer any special status due to name recognition.
Unfortunately, Detroit has elected several officeholders over the years related to well known political families that turned out to be terrible choices.
That would include both Monica Conyers and mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,033 posts)Not sure for how ling he's served.
MichMan
(11,938 posts)That is his grand nephew Ian. Ian had already indicated he was planning on running .
John Conyers III has no political experience and has not stated if he wants it or not
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)His son is 27 years old and the only political news he has ever made before today is getting fined for misusing a government-owned Escalade:
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/12/05/john-conyers-relatives-successor/108330920/
snooper2
(30,151 posts)You did a lot of good- And everyone will always know about the bad
AlleganCarpenter
(25 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 5, 2017, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)
Snyder will probably appoint a RW hack who will only make it easier for Ryan to pass his nutty agenda.
I believe a quid pro quo is in order. for everyone of ours who resigns/retires, two of theirs should bite the dust.
After all they have the moral responsibility on their side. Snark
I stand corrected. Snyder can call for a special election. Apparently, he is not bound to it which would leave the seat unfilled til the next general.
brooklynite
(94,596 posts)Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)And when did they know it?
Grins
(7,218 posts)Conyer's successor will be appointed by the Governor, in this case, skeevy Republican, Rick Snyder.
However...
The appointee must come from the departed/departing office holder's party!
Gonna' be fun to watch this.
special election. seat remains vacant until then.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)MichMan
(11,938 posts)At least it isn't his wife Monica he wants to succeed him
oberliner
(58,724 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)former9thward
(32,023 posts)Retiring just sounds a little better when you are under fire.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Media barely mentions him
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)He's a thuglican. You know how that is with the so-called liberal media that doesn't exist.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)ToxMarz
(2,169 posts)There aren't any, we have elections. The problem isn't a lack of rules to control the electorate, it is ignorance (willful and actual), stupidity, co-option by special interests (including religion), edc. It can't be fixed with rules "disqualifying" certain classes we may be able to find anecdotal evidence of abuses, if we did those rules would just then be turned inside out to work against us.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Meat Goblin says, "I gotcher woman President right here!!"
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)Does anyone know whether the son has any interest in running for office? Many children find they have absolutely no interest in following in their father's/mother's footsteps.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)that doesn't exonerate any of his harassment, but we need someone with his courage in the House, not a "go along to get along" replacement.
senaca
(209 posts)When John Conyers stepped down from the Judiciary Committee, who was elected to take his place and has that happened yet? How does this effect the Judiciary Committee and what are the implications going forward?