Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 09:40 PM Dec 2017

A Federal Ban on Making Lethal Viruses Is Lifted

Source: New York Times

Federal officials on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal.

Such work can now proceed, said Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, but only if a scientific panel decides that the benefits justify the risks.

Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine.

Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih.html?mtrref=www.google.com

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Federal Ban on Making Lethal Viruses Is Lifted (Original Post) bathroommonkey76 Dec 2017 OP
Send trump to inspect the labs Miigwech Dec 2017 #1
On one hand its risky but on the other without the ability to conduct such cstanleytech Dec 2017 #2
Most of the Manhattan Project scientists regretted splitting the atom. n/t eggplant Dec 2017 #8
Yes, scientific discoveries can be used to harm people but I do not believe cstanleytech Dec 2017 #15
Agree!!! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2017 #26
Responses such as yours illustrate an already solved dilemma LanternWaste Dec 2017 #33
Pandora's Box disalitervisum Dec 2017 #3
+1 2naSalit Dec 2017 #4
Yeah. Turbineguy Dec 2017 #5
They're going to keep the ban on making biological weapons, correct? jmowreader Dec 2017 #6
Build a wall, problem solved. lostnfound Dec 2017 #20
Finally, some good news They_Live Dec 2017 #7
The Andromeda Strain SCVDem Dec 2017 #9
The good news: Trump won't get a chance to blow the entire planet to hell. LudwigPastorius Dec 2017 #10
What could go wrong? irisblue Dec 2017 #11
The rich will wait out a plague in their million dollar bunkers. CrispyQ Dec 2017 #29
Can we mail them to people we don't like? milestogo Dec 2017 #12
We can't even keep bad fish contained dembotoz Dec 2017 #13
Damn. So great they're lifting all those pesky regulations. NT enough Dec 2017 #14
What could possibly go wrong? truthisfreedom Dec 2017 #16
What the fuck is wrong with our country? nt Laffy Kat Dec 2017 #17
Its as if Lex Luther stole the election. denbot Dec 2017 #18
I'd say these assholes are more like Spiderman's Norman Osbourne from Oscorp. Initech Dec 2017 #31
Use the POS for a guinie pig! burrowowl Dec 2017 #19
Don's intent on killing us one way or the other. Vinca Dec 2017 #21
Doesn't the government have a testing site? Cold War Spook Dec 2017 #22
Because this always works out fine in horror movies kaotikross Dec 2017 #23
The Stand, Walking Dead Bayard Dec 2017 #24
Look closer to reality: Lyme Disease. Squinch Dec 2017 #32
Population engineering. haele Dec 2017 #25
But stem cell research is still evil, right? Freethinker65 Dec 2017 #27
I wonder, is Trump a virus? n/t RKP5637 Dec 2017 #28
The other half of this pairing: Orangeutan Dec 2017 #30

cstanleytech

(26,320 posts)
2. On one hand its risky but on the other without the ability to conduct such
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 09:46 PM
Dec 2017

investigations it hampers the ability for doctors to develop counters to such things should some other country develop such a virus for a weapon to use against us or should such a virus develop naturally even.

cstanleytech

(26,320 posts)
15. Yes, scientific discoveries can be used to harm people but I do not believe
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 11:37 PM
Dec 2017

it to be wise to let the potential fear of that to interfere in research.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
33. Responses such as yours illustrate an already solved dilemma
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 03:18 PM
Dec 2017

Responses such as yours illustrate an already solved dilemma--- does the one-liner, bumper-sticker response take into account the nuance and complexity?

At best, hardly. It ignores (blithely or blindly) both the Research Ethic and the ethical conundrums occurring within the scientific community in regards to ethics

Cambridge Applied Ethics is the current gold standard in textual treaties on the topic. But Bernard Rollins' Science and Ethics, being much shorter may be more up your alley.

You project fear as a primary inhibitor of research, but the above sources lay out concern rather than fear (though I can see how replacing the words would take the wind out of your fortune-cookie's sail).

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
6. They're going to keep the ban on making biological weapons, correct?
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 10:27 PM
Dec 2017

We have a psychopathic president. As long as we make sure the bastard doesn't get the idea to take these "new and improved" more lethal germs and spray them on North Korea, we're good.

irisblue

(33,034 posts)
11. What could go wrong?
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 10:47 PM
Dec 2017

From the article.
SNIP
Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.
SNIP
In 2011, an outcry arose when laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands revealed that they were trying to mutate the lethal H5N1 bird flu in ways that would let it jump easily between ferrets, which are used to model human flu susceptibility.

Tensions rose in 2014 after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accidentally exposed lab workers to anthrax and shipped a deadly flu virus to a laboratory that had asked for a benign strain.
That year, the N.I.H. also found vials of smallpox in a freezer that had been forgotten for 50 years.
End
This sounds like a movie premise.

CrispyQ

(36,527 posts)
29. The rich will wait out a plague in their million dollar bunkers.
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 02:16 PM
Dec 2017

I can't imagine life in a bunker & how awful it would be.

Vinca

(50,310 posts)
21. Don's intent on killing us one way or the other.
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 08:24 AM
Dec 2017

Someone needs to penetrate the cotton candy veil and tell him he's not immune.

kaotikross

(246 posts)
23. Because this always works out fine in horror movies
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 11:10 AM
Dec 2017

I'm sure this won't be the start of the zombie pandemic or the plague or anything.

haele

(12,681 posts)
25. Population engineering.
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 02:10 PM
Dec 2017

One "oopsie" on a virus that attacks those with lowered immune systems (accidental or otherwise), sending it out in the wild and it infects the majority of the population.
Then anyone who can't afford to either isolate themselves from infection or to get quick critical care will risk a Spanish Influenza type pandemic - mainly lower paid social workers, the elderly and disabled, working poor and/or minorities in condensed communities will die off before TPTB can get a grip on the pandemic.

And then, this country will become one big Pleasantville. Lots of job openings that can be filled with thoughtless drones. Well-off whites, their fellow travelers, and their drones and sycophants.
You know that's what the GOP, White Identity Nationalists and Christianists are hoping for...

Haele

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A Federal Ban on Making L...